Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀与普瑞巴林治疗阿片类药物无反应性神经病理性癌痛的国际多中心、三期、双盲、剂量递增、平行臂、随机对照试验:JORTC-PAL16 试验方案。

Phase III, international, multicentre, double-blind, dose increment, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial of duloxetine versus pregabalin for opioid-unresponsive neuropathic cancer pain: a JORTC-PAL16 trial protocol.

机构信息

Department of Psycho-Oncology, Supportive and Palliative Care Development Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e050182. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050182.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Management of neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) refractory to regular opioids remains an important challenge. The efficacy of pregabalin for NCP except chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has already been confirmed in two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared with placebo. Duloxetine offers the potential of analgesia in opioid refractory NCP. However, there are no RCT of duloxetine for the management of opioid-refractory NCP as a first line treatment. Both classes of drugs have the potential to reduce NCP, but there has been no head-to-head comparison for the efficacy and safety, especially given differing side effect profiles.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An international, multicentre, double-blind, dose increment, parallel-arm, RCT is planned. Inclusion criteria include: adults with cancer experiencing NCP refractory to opioids; Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-item 3 (worst pain) of ≥4; Neuropathic Pain on the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale of ≥12 despite of an adequate trial of regular opioid medication (≥60 mg/day oral morphine equivalent dose). Patients with CIPN are excluded.The study will recruit from palliative care teams (both inpatients and outpatients) in Japan and Australia. Participants will be randomised (1:1 allocation ratio) to duloxetine or pregabalin arm. Dose escalation is until day 14 and from day 14 to 21 is a dose de-escalation period to avoid withdrawal effects. The primary endpoint is defined as the mean difference in BPI item 3 for worst pain intensity over the previous 24 hours at day 14 between groups. A sample size of 160 patients will be enrolled between February 2020 and March 2023.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained at Osaka City University Hospital Certified Review Board and South Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international journals and the key findings presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: jRCTs051190097, ACTRN12620000656932.

摘要

简介

治疗对常规阿片类药物难治的神经性癌痛(NCP)仍然是一个重要的挑战。已有两项随机对照试验(RCT)证实,普瑞巴林治疗除化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)以外的 NCP 的疗效优于安慰剂。度洛西汀在阿片类药物难治性 NCP 中具有镇痛潜力。然而,目前尚无 RCT 研究度洛西汀作为一线治疗药物治疗阿片类药物难治性 NCP。这两类药物都有可能减轻 NCP,但尚未对头对头比较其疗效和安全性进行比较,特别是鉴于不同的副作用谱。

方法和分析

计划进行一项国际性、多中心、双盲、剂量递增、平行臂 RCT。纳入标准包括:经历阿片类药物难治性 NCP 的成年癌症患者;BPI-项 3(最严重疼痛)≥4;尽管已进行了常规阿片类药物(≥60mg/天口服吗啡等效剂量)充分试验,但仍存在利手评估神经病理性症状和体征疼痛量表≥12 的神经性疼痛。排除 CIPN 患者。该研究将从日本和澳大利亚的姑息治疗团队(包括住院患者和门诊患者)招募参与者。参与者将按 1:1 的分配比例随机分配至度洛西汀或普瑞巴林组。剂量递增至第 14 天,第 14 天至第 21 天为剂量递减期,以避免撤药效应。主要终点定义为第 14 天两组间过去 24 小时内 BPI 项 3 中最严重疼痛强度的平均差值。预计将在 2020 年 2 月至 2023 年 3 月期间招募 160 名患者。

伦理和传播

大阪市立大学医院认证审查委员会和西南悉尼地方卫生区人类研究伦理委员会已批准该研究。该研究结果将提交国际期刊发表,并在国际会议上介绍主要研究结果。

试验注册编号

jRCTs051190097,ACTRN12620000656932。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ca/8823224/a31ef88752e0/bmjopen-2021-050182f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验