EPIUnit (Unidade de Investigação em Epidemiologia), Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
ITR (Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health), Porto, Portugal.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147078. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47078.
Resuscitation is a niche example of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected society in the long term. Those trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) face the dilemma that attempting to save a life may result in their own harm. This is most of all a problem for drowning, where hypoxia is the cause of cardiac arrest and ventilation is the essential first step in reversing the situation.
To develop recommendations for water rescue organizations in providing their rescuers with safe drowning resuscitation procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Two consecutive modified Delphi procedures involving 56 participants from 17 countries with expertise in drowning prevention research, resuscitation, and programming were performed from March 28, 2020, to March 29, 2021. In parallel, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify new emerging evidence relevant to each core element, acknowledge previous studies relevant in the new context, and identify knowledge gaps.
Seven core elements, each with their own specific recommendations, were identified in the initial consensus procedure and were grouped into 4 categories: (1) prevention and mitigation of the risks of becoming infected, (2) resuscitation of drowned persons during the COVID-19 pandemic, (3) organizational responsibilities, and (4) organizations unable to meet the recommended guidelines. The common measures of infection risk mitigation, personal protective equipment, and vaccination are the base of the recommendations. Measures to increase drowning prevention efforts reduce the root cause of the dilemma. Additional infection risk mitigation measures include screening all people entering aquatic facilities, defining criteria for futile resuscitation, and avoiding contact with drowned persons by rescuers with a high-risk profile. Ventilation techniques must balance required skill level, oxygen delivery, infection risk, and costs of equipment and training. Bag-mask ventilation with a high-efficiency particulate air filter by 2 trained rescuers is advised. Major implications for the methods, facilities, and environment of CPR training have been identified, including nonpractical skills to avoid being infected or to infect others. Most of all, the organization is responsible for informing their members about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and taking measures that maximize rescuer safety. Research is urgently needed to better understand, develop, and implement strategies to reduce infection transmission during drowning resuscitation.
This consensus document provides an overview of recommendations for water rescue organizations to improve the safety of their rescuers during the COVID-19 pandemic and balances the competing interests between a potentially lifesaving intervention and risk to the rescuer. The consensus-based recommendations can also serve as an example for other volunteer organizations and altruistic laypeople who may provide resuscitation.
复苏是 COVID-19 大流行长期影响社会的一个特例。那些接受过心肺复苏术 (CPR) 培训的人面临着这样一个困境,即试图挽救生命可能会导致自身受到伤害。对于溺水者来说,这尤其成问题,因为缺氧是心脏骤停的原因,而通气是逆转这种情况的必要的第一步。
为水上救援组织制定在 COVID-19 大流行期间为其救援人员提供安全溺水复苏程序的建议。
2020 年 3 月 28 日至 2021 年 3 月 29 日,来自 17 个国家的溺水预防研究、复苏和编程方面的专家参与了两次连续的改良 Delphi 程序,共有 56 名参与者。同时,在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 上进行了搜索,以确定与每个核心要素相关的新出现的证据,承认在新背景下相关的先前研究,并确定知识空白。
在最初的共识程序中确定了 7 个核心要素,每个要素都有自己特定的建议,并将其分为 4 类:(1)预防和减轻感染风险,(2)COVID-19 大流行期间对溺水者进行复苏,(3)组织责任,和(4)无法满足建议指南的组织。感染风险缓解、个人防护设备和疫苗接种等共同措施是建议的基础。增加溺水预防工作的措施可以减少困境的根本原因。其他感染风险缓解措施包括对进入水上设施的所有人进行筛查、定义无效复苏的标准以及避免高风险特征的救援人员与溺水者接触。通气技术必须平衡所需的技能水平、氧气输送、感染风险以及设备和培训的成本。建议由 2 名经过培训的救援人员使用高效微粒空气过滤器进行面罩-球囊通气。还确定了心肺复苏培训的方法、设施和环境的重大影响,包括避免感染或感染他人的非实际技能。最重要的是,组织有责任告知其成员 COVID-19 大流行的影响,并采取措施最大程度地提高救援人员的安全性。迫切需要研究来更好地理解、开发和实施策略,以减少溺水复苏期间的感染传播。
本共识文件概述了水上救援组织的建议,以提高其救援人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的安全性,并平衡了潜在救生干预措施与救援人员风险之间的竞争利益。基于共识的建议还可以作为其他志愿者组织和利他主义的非专业人员的榜样,他们可能会提供复苏服务。