Ferré Alexis, Marquion Fabien, Delord Marc, Gros Antoine, Lacave Guillaume, Laurent Virginie, Merceron Sybille, Paul Marine, Simon Christelle, Troché Gilles, Charbonnel Clément, Marque-Juillet Stéphanie, Bruneel Fabrice, Legriel Stéphane
Intensive Care Unit, Versailles Hospital, 177 Rue de Versailles, 78150, Le Chesnay, France.
Department of Anesthesiology, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Feb 8;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-00981-2.
To evaluate the association between ventilator type and hospital mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2 infection), a single-center prospective observational study in France.
We prospectively included consecutive adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university-affiliated tertiary hospital for ARDS related to proven COVID-19, between March 2020 and July 2021. All patients were intubated. We compared two patient groups defined by whether an ICU ventilator or a less sophisticated ventilator such as a sophisticated turbine-based transport ventilator was used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted. Cox multivariate regression was performed to identify associations between patient characteristics and hospital mortality. We included 189 patients (140 [74.1%] men) with a median age of 65 years [IQR, 55-73], of whom 61 (32.3%) died before hospital discharge. By multivariate analysis, factors associated with in-hospital mortality were age ≥ 70 years (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.24-3.59; P = 0.006), immunodeficiency (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.16-5.09; P = 0.02) and serum creatinine ≥ 100 µmol/L (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.77-5.10; P < 0.001) but not ventilator type. As compared to conventional ICU (equipped with ICU and anesthesiology ventilators), management in transient ICU (equipped with non-ICU turbine-based ventilators) was associated neither with a longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (18 [IQR, 11-32] vs. 21 [13-37] days, respectively; P = 0.39) nor with a longer ICU stay (24 [IQR, 14-40] vs. 27 [15-44] days, respectively; P = 0.44).
In ventilated patients with ARDS due to COVID-19, management in transient ICU equipped with non-ICU sophisticated turbine-based ventilators was not associated with worse outcomes compared to standard ICU, equipped with ICU ventilators. Although our study design is not powered to demonstrate any difference in outcome, our results after adjustment do not suggest any signal of harm when using these transport type ventilators as an alternative to ICU ventilators during COVID-19 surge.
为评估与新型冠状病毒肺炎(SARS-CoV2感染)相关的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者使用的呼吸机类型与医院死亡率之间的关联,在法国进行了一项单中心前瞻性观察性研究。
我们前瞻性纳入了2020年3月至2021年7月期间因确诊新型冠状病毒肺炎相关ARDS入住大学附属医院三级重症监护病房(ICU)的连续成年患者。所有患者均行气管插管。我们比较了两组患者,这两组患者根据是否使用ICU呼吸机或不太复杂的呼吸机(如基于涡轮的先进转运呼吸机)来定义。绘制了Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。进行Cox多因素回归分析以确定患者特征与医院死亡率之间的关联。我们纳入了189例患者(140例[74.1%]为男性),中位年龄为65岁[四分位间距,55 - 73岁],其中61例(32.3%)在出院前死亡。多因素分析显示,与院内死亡相关的因素为年龄≥70岁(HR,2.11;95%CI,1.24 - 3.59;P = 0.006)、免疫缺陷(HR,2.43;95%CI,1.16 - 5.09;P = 0.02)和血清肌酐≥100 μmol/L(HR,3.01;95%CI,1.77 - 5.10;P < 0.001),但与呼吸机类型无关。与传统ICU(配备ICU和麻醉呼吸机)相比,临时ICU(配备非ICU涡轮呼吸机)的管理既未导致有创机械通气时间延长(分别为18天[四分位间距,11 - 32天]和21天[13 - 37天];P = 0.39),也未导致ICU住院时间延长(分别为24天[四分位间距,14 - 40天]和27天[15 - 44天];P = 0.44)。
在因新型冠状病毒肺炎导致ARDS的机械通气患者中,与配备ICU呼吸机的标准ICU相比,配备非ICU先进涡轮呼吸机的临时ICU管理并未导致更差的结局。尽管我们的研究设计无法证明结局有任何差异,但我们调整后的结果并未提示在新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期间使用这些转运型呼吸机替代ICU呼吸机时有任何有害信号。