• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Counting Advanced Precancerous Lesions as True Positives When Determining Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Specificity.在确定结直肠癌筛查试验特异性时,将高级癌前病变计为真阳性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):1040-1043. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac027.
2
A Cell-free DNA Blood-Based Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.基于无细胞游离 DNA 的血液检测用于结直肠癌筛查。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Mar 14;390(11):973-983. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304714.
3
Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.分析两种用于筛查普通风险成年人结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测的有效性。
Public Health. 2020 May;182:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
Cost-effectiveness of a multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening of Medicare beneficiaries.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测用于医疗保险受益人群结直肠癌筛查的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0220234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220234. eCollection 2019.
5
Colorectal cancer screening: comparison of transferrin and immuno fecal occult blood test.结直肠癌筛查:转铁蛋白与免疫粪便隐血试验的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun 7;18(21):2682-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i21.2682.
6
Novel DNA methylation biomarkers in stool and blood for early detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.粪便和血液中新的 DNA 甲基化生物标志物用于结直肠癌和癌前病变的早期检测。
Clin Epigenetics. 2023 Feb 17;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01443-7.
7
Effectiveness of the immunofecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening in a large population.免疫粪便隐血试验在大规模人群中筛查结直肠癌的效果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Jan;56(1):203-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1264-8. Epub 2010 May 11.
8
Serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 serves as a novel diagnostic biomarker of early-stage colorectal cancer.血清巨噬细胞抑制因子-1 可作为早期结直肠癌的新型诊断生物标志物。
Biomarkers. 2021 Nov;26(7):598-605. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2021.1950209. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
9
A novel screening method of DNA methylation biomarkers helps to improve the detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.一种新型的 DNA 甲基化生物标志物筛选方法有助于提高结直肠癌及癌前病变的检测率。
Cancer Med. 2023 Nov;12(21):20626-20638. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6511. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
10
High accuracy of a blood ctDNA-based multimodal test to detect colorectal cancer.基于血液中循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)的多模态检测对结直肠癌检测具有高准确性。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Dec;34(12):1187-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3113. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel colorectal cancer screening methods - opportunities and challenges.新型结直肠癌筛查方法——机遇与挑战
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01037-7.
2
A Blood-Based Assay for Detection of Patients with Advanced Adenomas.一种用于检测晚期腺瘤患者的血液检测方法。
Cancer Res Commun. 2025 Apr 1;5(4):621-631. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0398.
3
Modeling and the Use of Surrogate Endpoints: Is This a Valid Approach?替代终点的建模与应用:这是一种有效的方法吗?
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 May;70(5):1711-1722. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08725-x. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
4
Projected Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Novel Molecular Blood-Based or Stool-Based Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer.新型基于血液或粪便的分子结直肠癌筛查检测的预期影响和成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Dec;177(12):1610-1620. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-00910. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With Blood-Based Biomarkers (Liquid Biopsy) vs Fecal Tests or Colonoscopy.基于血液生物标志物(液体活检)的结直肠癌筛查与粪便检测或结肠镜检查的比较有效性和成本效益。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jul;167(2):378-391. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
6
An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles.一种评估结直肠癌新型无创筛查检测的有效策略:指导原则。
Gut. 2023 Oct;72(10):1904-1918. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329701. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.粪便检测、乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 2;9(10):e032773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032773.
2
Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.45 岁而非 50 岁开始对一般风险人群进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和国家影响。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jul;157(1):137-148. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测筛查结直肠肿瘤的有效性和成本效益比较。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):427-439.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
4
Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测用于结直肠癌筛查。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1287-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311194. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
5
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.

在确定结直肠癌筛查试验特异性时,将高级癌前病变计为真阳性。

Counting Advanced Precancerous Lesions as True Positives When Determining Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Specificity.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public Health and Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):1040-1043. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac027.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djac027
PMID:35134969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9275773/
Abstract

The landmark Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) decision memo on blood-based biomarkers to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) sets thresholds of 74% or higher for sensitivity and 90% or higher for specificity for CRC. This approach does not consider detection of advanced precancerous lesions as true positives. We contrasted the impact of counting advanced precancerous lesions as true vs false positives and projected CRC outcomes under contrasting tests in a validated model. A test with the threshold performance set by CMS decreased CRC incidence by 30% and CRC mortality by 48% in individuals aged 45 years. If this test also detected advanced precancerous lesions with 30% sensitivity, CRC incidence decreased by 45% and mortality by 58%, but the CRC specificity of the test of only 88% would not satisfy the CMS threshold. CMS should reconsider its definition of threshold specificity for CRC screening biomarkers. Future coverage determinations on biomarkers to screen for cancer should consider detection of relevant precursor lesions and projected outcomes.

摘要

美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)关于血液生物标志物筛查结直肠癌(CRC)的具有里程碑意义的决策备忘录为 CRC 设置了灵敏度阈值为 74%或更高,特异性阈值为 90%或更高。这种方法并未将检测到的高级癌前病变视为真正的阳性。我们对比了将高级癌前病变视为真阳性与假阳性的影响,并在经过验证的模型中根据对比试验预测了 CRC 的结果。CMS 设定的阈值性能的检测方法可使 45 岁人群的 CRC 发病率降低 30%,CRC 死亡率降低 48%。如果该检测还能以 30%的灵敏度检测到高级癌前病变,CRC 的发病率会降低 45%,死亡率降低 58%,但检测的 CRC 特异性为 88%,将不符合 CMS 的阈值。CMS 应重新考虑其 CRC 筛查生物标志物阈值特异性的定义。未来对用于癌症筛查的生物标志物的覆盖范围决定应考虑到相关的前体病变的检测和预测的结果。