• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替代终点的建模与应用:这是一种有效的方法吗?

Modeling and the Use of Surrogate Endpoints: Is This a Valid Approach?

作者信息

Ladabaum Uri, van Duuren Luuk A, Half Elizabeth E, Levi Zohar, Silverman Barbara, Lansdorp-Vogelaar Iris

机构信息

School of Medicine, Stanford University, 430 Broadway Street Pavilion C, 3Rd Floor C-326, Redwood, CA, USA.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2025 May;70(5):1711-1722. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08725-x. Epub 2025 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08725-x
PMID:39779593
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Development of novel colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests is a dynamic field. Decision analytic modeling based on inputs derived from rigorous prospective studies informs CRC screening guidelines. Exploratory modeling may have a place in early phases of test development.

METHODS

We explored whether (1) surrogate endpoints for long-term, programmatic effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness could be potentially informative in early stages of test development and (2) whether rapid exploratory modeling with a web-based tool would be feasible.

RESULTS

First, based on comparisons with published estimates for reductions in CRC mortality with various screening tests in four established decision analytic models of CRC screening, the surrogate endpoint of the number needed to colonoscope to detect one CRC or advanced precancerous lesion (APL) in round 1 of screening appears to hold promise as a measure of clinical effectiveness. Similarly, based on comparisons with published estimates for cost/quality-adjusted life-year gained with screening in the four models, the surrogate endpoint of cost to detect one CRC or APL in round 1 of screening appears to hold promise as a measure of cost-effectiveness. Second, exploration of the impact of lowering the screening initiation age in Israel from age 50 to 45 with the web-based EU-TOPIA tool, compared with the results of a recently published comprehensive modeling study, suggests that exploratory modeling of programmatic screening may be feasible with relatively low time demand vs. that required for typical full-length modeling publications.

CONCLUSION

Further validation in other models and with a broader set of test performance characteristics is prudent before surrogate endpoints or rapid modeling are incorporated into the novel test development process.

摘要

背景

新型结直肠癌(CRC)筛查测试的开发是一个动态领域。基于严格前瞻性研究得出的输入数据进行的决策分析模型为CRC筛查指南提供了依据。探索性建模在测试开发的早期阶段可能会发挥作用。

方法

我们探讨了(1)长期、项目有效性和成本效益的替代终点在测试开发早期阶段是否可能具有参考价值,以及(2)使用基于网络的工具进行快速探索性建模是否可行。

结果

首先,通过与四个已建立的CRC筛查决策分析模型中各种筛查测试降低CRC死亡率的已发表估计值进行比较,在第一轮筛查中结肠镜检查发现一例CRC或高级癌前病变(APL)所需的人数这一替代终点,似乎有望作为临床有效性的衡量指标。同样,通过与四个模型中筛查获得的成本/质量调整生命年的已发表估计值进行比较,在第一轮筛查中检测一例CRC或APL的成本这一替代终点,似乎有望作为成本效益的衡量指标。其次,使用基于网络的欧盟-TOPIA工具探索将以色列的筛查起始年龄从50岁降低到45岁的影响,与最近发表的一项全面建模研究的结果相比,表明与典型的完整建模出版物所需时间相比,项目筛查的探索性建模可能在相对较低的时间需求下可行。

结论

在将替代终点或快速建模纳入新型测试开发过程之前,谨慎地在其他模型中并结合更广泛的测试性能特征进行进一步验证是明智的。

相似文献

1
Modeling and the Use of Surrogate Endpoints: Is This a Valid Approach?替代终点的建模与应用:这是一种有效的方法吗?
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 May;70(5):1711-1722. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08725-x. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With Blood-Based Biomarkers (Liquid Biopsy) vs Fecal Tests or Colonoscopy.基于血液生物标志物(液体活检)的结直肠癌筛查与粪便检测或结肠镜检查的比较有效性和成本效益。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jul;167(2):378-391. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
3
Impact of the serrated pathway on the simulated comparative effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening tests.锯齿状途径对结直肠癌筛查试验模拟比较效果的影响。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Sep 2;8(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae077.
4
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
5
Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer.对囊性纤维化患者进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益分析。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):556-567.e18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
7
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in high-risk Spanish patients: use of a validated model to inform public policy.结直肠癌筛查在西班牙高危人群中的成本效益:使用验证模型为公共政策提供信息。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Nov;19(11):2765-76. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0530. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
8
Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.45 岁而非 50 岁开始对一般风险人群进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和国家影响。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jul;157(1):137-148. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
9
Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.合并症对糖尿病患者结直肠癌筛查成本效益研究的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):730-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1972-6. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
10
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With a Blood Test That Meets the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Decision.基于满足医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心覆盖范围决策的血液检测进行结直肠癌筛查的效果和成本效益。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jul;167(2):368-377. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating New Non-invasive Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer: An In-Depth International Perspective-Introduction to a Special Issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences.评估结直肠癌新型非侵入性筛查试验:深入的国际视角——《消化疾病与科学》特刊引言
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08934-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With a Blood Test That Meets the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Decision.基于满足医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心覆盖范围决策的血液检测进行结直肠癌筛查的效果和成本效益。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jul;167(2):368-377. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Next-Generation Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.用于结直肠癌筛查的下一代多靶点粪便 DNA 检测。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Mar 14;390(11):984-993. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2310336.
3
A Cell-free DNA Blood-Based Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
基于无细胞游离 DNA 的血液检测用于结直肠癌筛查。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Mar 14;390(11):973-983. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304714.
4
Multitarget Stool RNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.多靶点粪便 RNA 检测用于结直肠癌筛查。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 14;330(18):1760-1768. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.22231.
5
An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles.一种评估结直肠癌新型无创筛查检测的有效策略:指导原则。
Gut. 2023 Oct;72(10):1904-1918. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329701. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
6
Counting Advanced Precancerous Lesions as True Positives When Determining Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Specificity.在确定结直肠癌筛查试验特异性时,将高级癌前病变计为真阳性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):1040-1043. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac027.
7
The EU-TOPIA evaluation tool: An online modelling-based tool for informing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening decisions in Europe.欧盟-乌托邦评估工具:一种基于在线建模的工具,用于为欧洲的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查决策提供信息。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Apr 30;22:101392. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101392. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417.
9
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
10
Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe.用于预测欧洲结直肠癌筛查益处的三种区域微观模拟模型的开发与验证
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 29;6(1):2381468320984974. doi: 10.1177/2381468320984974. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.