Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada (M.M., W.J.C., S.E.S.M.).
Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada (M.N.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;15(3):e011323. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011323. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
Coronary microvascular function can be distinctly quantified using the coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR). Patients with low CFR can present with low or high IMR, although the prevalence and clinical characteristics of these patient groups remain unclear.
One hundred ninety-nine patients underwent coronary microvascular assessments using coronary thermodilution techniques. A pressure-temperature sensor-tipped guidewire measured proximal and distal coronary pressure, whereas the inverse of the mean transit time to room temperature saline was used to measure coronary blood flow. The CFR and IMR were quantified during adenosine and acetylcholine hyperemia.
Low adenosine and acetylcholine CFR was observed in 70 and 49 patients, respectively, whereas low CFR/low IMR to adenosine and acetylcholine was observed in 39(56%) and 19(39%) patients, respectively. Despite similar adenosine CFR, patients with low CFR/low IMR had increased resting (2.8±1.2 versus 1.3±0.4s) and hyperemic coronary blood flow (4.8±1.5 versus 2.1±0.5s) compared with patients with low CFR/high IMR (both <0.01). The same pattern was observed in response to acetylcholine. Patients with low CFR/low IMR to adenosine were younger (56±12 versus 63±10 years), women (84% versus 66%), had fewer coronary risk factors (1.1±1.0 versus 1.6±1.1), lower hemoglobin A1c (5.8±0.7 versus 6.1±0.9 mmol/L), and thinner septal thickness (8.5±2.5 versus 9.9±1.6 mm) compared with patients with low CFR/high IMR to adenosine (all <0.05).
Low CFR/low IMR to adenosine and acetylcholine are associated with elevated resting coronary blood flow and preserved hyperemic coronary blood flow. These patients present with distinct phenotypic characteristics. Simultaneous CFR and IMR measures appear necessary to differentiate these endotypes.
使用冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)和微血管阻力指数(IMR)可以明显量化冠状动脉微血管功能。尽管这些患者群体的患病率和临床特征尚不清楚,但低 CFR 患者的 IMR 可以低或高。
199 例患者接受了冠状动脉微血管评估,采用冠状动脉热稀释技术。近端和远端冠状动脉压力由带压力-温度传感器的导丝测量,而室温生理盐水的平均通过时间的倒数用于测量冠状动脉血流。腺苷和乙酰胆碱激发时定量 CFR 和 IMR。
分别有 70 例和 49 例患者出现低腺苷和乙酰胆碱 CFR,而分别有 39(56%)和 19(39%)例患者出现低 CFR/低 IMR 至腺苷和乙酰胆碱,尽管腺苷 CFR 相似,但与低 CFR/高 IMR 患者相比,低 CFR/低 IMR 患者的静息状态(2.8±1.2 与 1.3±0.4s)和充血性冠状动脉血流(4.8±1.5 与 2.1±0.5s)更高(均<0.01)。乙酰胆碱也呈现相同的模式。低 CFR/低 IMR 至腺苷的患者更年轻(56±12 与 63±10 岁),女性(84%与 66%),冠状动脉危险因素较少(1.1±1.0 与 1.6±1.1),糖化血红蛋白 A1c 较低(5.8±0.7 与 6.1±0.9mmol/L),间隔厚度较薄(8.5±2.5 与 9.9±1.6mm)(均<0.05)。
低 CFR/低 IMR 至腺苷和乙酰胆碱与静息冠状动脉血流升高和充血性冠状动脉血流保留有关。这些患者表现出明显的表型特征。同时测量 CFR 和 IMR 似乎是区分这些内表型所必需的。