Wen Wei, Chi Yi, Liu Mingwang, Xie Beili, Gao Mengjie, Jiang Lulian, Zhang Yiqing, Chen Keji, Zhao Fuhai
Cardiovascular Department, Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 100091 Beijing, China.
Geriatrics Department, The People's Hospital Medical Group of Xiangzhou, 519000 Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 25;26(8):25764. doi: 10.31083/RCM25764. eCollection 2025 Aug.
While the invasive index of microcirculation resistance (IMR) remains the gold standard for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), its clinical adoption is limited by procedural complexity and cost. Angiography-based IMR (Angio-IMR), a computational angiography-based method, offers a promising alternative. This study evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of Angio-IMR for CMD detection in angina pectoris (AP).
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies assessing Angio-IMR's diagnostic performance for CMD in AP populations. Primary outcomes included pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).
11 studies involving 927 patients were included. Angio-IMR demonstrated robust diagnostic performance: sensitivity 86% (95% CI: 0.83-0.90), specificity 90% (95% CI: 0.87-0.92), PPV 82% (95% CI: 0.78-0.86), NPV 91% (95% CI: 0.88-0.94), and AUC 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), with low heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between obstructive (stenosis ≥50%) and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Hyperemic Angio-IMR measurements (adenosine-induced) showed superior sensitivity (89% vs. 86%) and specificity (94% vs. 91%) compared to resting-state assessments by AccuFFR system. Additionally, the sensitivity (88% vs. 82%), specificity (92% vs. 86%), PPV (82% vs. 78%) and NPV (91% vs. 88%) calculated based on AccuFFR were higher than that of quantitative flow ratio (QFR).
Angio-IMR is a reliable, non-invasive tool for CMD identification in angina patients, particularly under hyperemic conditions. Its diagnostic consistency across stenosis severity subgroups supports broad clinical applicability.
虽然微循环阻力侵入指数(IMR)仍然是诊断冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)的金标准,但其临床应用受到操作复杂性和成本的限制。基于血管造影的IMR(Angio-IMR)是一种基于计算机血管造影的方法,提供了一种有前景的替代方案。本研究评估了Angio-IMR在心绞痛(AP)中检测CMD的诊断效能。
在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的文献检索,以确定评估Angio-IMR在AP人群中对CMD诊断性能的研究。主要结局包括合并敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)以及受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)。
纳入了11项研究,共927例患者。Angio-IMR显示出强大的诊断性能:敏感性86%(95%CI:0.83 - 0.90),特异性90%(95%CI:0.87 - 0.92),PPV 82%(95%CI:0.78 - 0.86),NPV 91%(95%CI:0.88 - 0.94),AUC 0.91(95%CI:0.89 - 0.94),异质性较低。亚组分析显示,阻塞性(狭窄≥50%)和非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病之间的诊断准确性无显著差异。与AccuFFR系统的静息状态评估相比,充血状态下的Angio-IMR测量(腺苷诱导)显示出更高的敏感性(89%对86%)和特异性(94%对91%)。此外,基于AccuFFR计算的敏感性(88%对82%)特异性(92%对86%)、PPV(82%对7)和NPV(91%对88%)均高于定量血流比率(QFR)。
Angio-IMR是一种可靠的、非侵入性的工具,可用于识别心绞痛患者的CMD,尤其是在充血状态下。其在不同狭窄严重程度亚组中的诊断一致性支持其广泛的临床适用性。