Paiva Luis, Gutiérrez Enrique, Ferreira Maria João, Gonçalves Lino
Medical School, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Cardiology Department, Coimbra's University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.
CJC Open. 2025 Apr 10;7(6):709-718. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.005. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The assessment of coronary physiology is seldom considered in cases of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study aimed to characterize coronary physiology and determine the incidence of microvascular dysfunction in the myocardial infarction (MI) culprit coronary artery during the acute phase of NSTEMI and subsequent follow-up evaluation.
This study included 30 patients hospitalized for NSTEMI. A physiological assessment of the MI culprit coronary artery was performed using fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). At a median of 7 months after MI, patients underwent repeated physiological assessment of the same coronary artery.
Microvascular dysfunction identified using CFR (< 2.0) was frequently present (60%) during the acute phase of NSTEMI, whereas severe microcirculatory dysfunction (IMR > 40) was uncommon (17%). Over time, a significant reduction occurred in the prevalence of abnormal CFR values (< 2.0; 60% vs 26%, = 0.013) and extensive microvascular resistance (IMR > 40; 17% vs 4%, = 0.03) at the follow-up evaluation. Patients were categorized according to their CFR and IMR results. In patients with abnormal CFR (< 2.0) and normal IMR (< 25), reduced CFR is attributable to elevated resting coronary blood flow rather than diminished hyperemic flow.
In the acute phase of NSTEMI, reduced CFR was commonly observed in the MI culprit coronary artery, whereas severe microcirculatory dysfunction was infrequent.
在非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)病例中,很少考虑对冠状动脉生理功能进行评估。本研究旨在描述冠状动脉生理功能特征,并确定NSTEMI急性期及后续随访评估期间心肌梗死(MI)罪犯冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的发生率。
本研究纳入了30例因NSTEMI住院的患者。使用血流储备分数、冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)和微循环阻力指数(IMR)对MI罪犯冠状动脉进行生理功能评估。在心肌梗死后中位数7个月时,患者对同一冠状动脉进行重复生理功能评估。
在NSTEMI急性期,使用CFR(<2.0)识别出的微血管功能障碍很常见(60%),而严重的微循环功能障碍(IMR>40)并不常见(17%)。随着时间的推移,随访评估时CFR异常值(<2.0;60%对26%,P=0.013)和广泛微血管阻力(IMR>40;17%对4%,P=0.03)的患病率显著降低。根据患者的CFR和IMR结果进行分类。在CFR异常(<2.0)且IMR正常(<25)的患者中,CFR降低归因于静息冠状动脉血流增加而非充血血流减少。
在NSTEMI急性期,MI罪犯冠状动脉中常见CFR降低,而严重的微循环功能障碍并不常见。