• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析机器人在社交媒体上两极化立场中的作用。

Characterizing the role of bots' in polarized stance on social media.

作者信息

Aldayel Abeer, Magdy Walid

机构信息

School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00858-z. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1007/s13278-022-00858-z
PMID:35136453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8814794/
Abstract

There is a rising concern with social bots that imitate humans and manipulate opinions on social media. Current studies on assessing the overall effect of bots on social media users mainly focus on evaluating the diffusion of discussions on social networks by bots. Yet, these studies do not confirm the relationship between bots and users' stances. This study fills in the gap by analyzing if these bots are part of the signals that formulated social media users' stances towards controversial topics. We analyze users' online interactions that are predictive to their stances and identify the bots within these interactions. We applied our analysis on a dataset of more than 4000 Twitter users who expressed a stance on seven different topics. We analyzed those users' direct interactions and indirect exposures with more than 19 million accounts. We identify the bot accounts for supporting/against stances, and compare them to other types of accounts, such as the accounts of influential and famous users. Our analysis showed that bot interactions with users who had specific stances were minimal when compared to the influential accounts. Nevertheless, we found that the presence of bots was still connected to users' stances, especially in an indirect manner, as users are exposed to the content of the bots they follow, rather than by directly interacting with them by retweeting, mentioning, or replying.

摘要

人们越来越关注模仿人类并在社交媒体上操纵舆论的社交机器人。当前关于评估机器人对社交媒体用户的总体影响的研究主要集中在评估机器人在社交网络上讨论的传播情况。然而,这些研究并未证实机器人与用户立场之间的关系。本研究通过分析这些机器人是否是构成社交媒体用户对争议性话题立场的信号的一部分来填补这一空白。我们分析了对用户立场具有预测性的在线互动,并识别出这些互动中的机器人。我们将分析应用于一个包含4000多名在七个不同话题上表达了立场的推特用户的数据集。我们分析了这些用户与超过1900万个账户的直接互动和间接接触。我们识别出支持/反对立场的机器人账户,并将它们与其他类型的账户进行比较,比如有影响力的知名用户的账户。我们的分析表明,与有影响力的账户相比,机器人与持有特定立场的用户之间的互动很少。然而,我们发现机器人的存在仍然与用户的立场有关,尤其是以一种间接的方式,因为用户会接触到他们关注的机器人的内容,而不是通过转发、提及或回复直接与它们互动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/310e607dce4c/13278_2022_858_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/5ccf27986d8d/13278_2022_858_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/5f1f1ecc2caa/13278_2022_858_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/b6fa149a06fe/13278_2022_858_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/5a99fee2f363/13278_2022_858_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/0f12a8b955c8/13278_2022_858_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/a3e3943076c5/13278_2022_858_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/62ceb703aa8e/13278_2022_858_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/310e607dce4c/13278_2022_858_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/5ccf27986d8d/13278_2022_858_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/5f1f1ecc2caa/13278_2022_858_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/b6fa149a06fe/13278_2022_858_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/5a99fee2f363/13278_2022_858_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/0f12a8b955c8/13278_2022_858_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/a3e3943076c5/13278_2022_858_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/62ceb703aa8e/13278_2022_858_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d87/8814794/310e607dce4c/13278_2022_858_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterizing the role of bots' in polarized stance on social media.剖析机器人在社交媒体上两极化立场中的作用。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00858-z. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
2
Social Bots' Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic Discussion on Twitter.社交媒体机器人在推特上关于 COVID-19 大流行讨论中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;20(4):3284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043284.
3
Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.武器化的健康传播:推特机器人和俄罗斯水军放大疫苗辩论。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1378-1384. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Social Bots' Involvement in the COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions on Twitter.社交媒体机器人在推特上对新冠疫苗讨论的参与。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(3):1651. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031651.
5
Social Bots' Sentiment Engagement in Health Emergencies: A Topic-Based Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic Discussions on Twitter.社交媒体机器人在健康突发事件中的情感参与:基于主题的 COVID-19 大流行在 Twitter 上讨论分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;17(22):8701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228701.
6
Not our kind of crowd! How partisan bias distorts perceptions of political bots on Twitter (now X).不是我们这类人!党派偏见如何扭曲在推特(现为X)上对政治机器人的认知。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12794. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12794. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
7
Public Opinion Manipulation on Social Media: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Bots during the COVID-19 Pandemic.社交媒体上的舆论操纵:新冠疫情期间推特机器人的社交网络分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;19(24):16376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416376.
8
E-Cigarette Surveillance With Social Media Data: Social Bots, Emerging Topics, and Trends.利用社交媒体数据进行电子烟监测:社交机器人、新兴话题及趋势
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Dec 20;3(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8641.
9
Assessing the Role of Social Bots During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infodemic, Disagreement, and Criticism.评估新冠疫情期间社交机器人的作用:信息疫情、分歧和批评。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 25;24(8):e36085. doi: 10.2196/36085.
10
Bots' Activity on COVID-19 Pro and Anti-Vaccination Networks: Analysis of Spanish-Written Messages on Twitter.机器人在新冠疫情支持与反对疫苗接种网络上的活动:对推特上西班牙语推文的分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 2;10(8):1240. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081240.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying Bot Impact: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Complexity and Uncertainty in Online Political Communication Dynamics.量化机器人的影响:在线政治传播动态中复杂性与不确定性的信息论分析
Entropy (Basel). 2025 May 28;27(6):573. doi: 10.3390/e27060573.
2
A global comparison of social media bot and human characteristics.社交媒体机器人与人类特征的全球比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):10973. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96372-1.
3
Susceptibility to COVID-19 Nutrition Misinformation and Eating Behavior Change during Lockdowns: An International Web-Based Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Limited Role of Bots in Spreading Vaccine-Critical Information Among Active Twitter Users in the United States: 2017-2019.美国活跃推特用户中,机器人在传播疫苗负面信息方面作用有限:2017-2019 年。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S319-S325. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305902.
2
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.社交机器人传播低可信度内容。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 20;9(1):4787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
3
Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems.机器人增加了在线社交系统中负面和煽动性内容的曝光率。
COVID-19 相关营养错误信息的易感性与封锁期间的饮食行为变化:一项国际网络调查。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 14;15(2):451. doi: 10.3390/nu15020451.
4
Lifetime of tweets: a statistical analysis.推文的生命周期:一项统计分析。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00926-4. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 4;115(49):12435-12440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803470115. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research.社交媒体中的社会影响力:一种评估研究社会影响力的新方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0203117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203117. eCollection 2018.
5
Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.武器化的健康传播:推特机器人和俄罗斯水军放大疫苗辩论。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1378-1384. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Stance and influence of Twitter users regarding the Brexit referendum.推特用户对英国脱欧公投的立场及影响。
Comput Soc Netw. 2017;4(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40649-017-0042-6. Epub 2017 Jul 24.