• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对活体系统综述的定制版 PRISMA 2020 流程图:方法学调查与建议。

Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal.

机构信息

Cochrane Central Executive, Cochrane, London, St Albans House, 57-59 Haymarket, London, SW1Y 4QX, UK.

Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Cornell University, Qatar Foundation - Education City, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2021 Mar 8;10:192. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51723.3. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.51723.3
PMID:35136567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8804909/
Abstract

: While the PRISMA flow diagram is widely used for reporting standard systematic reviews (SRs), it was not designed for capturing the results of continual searches for studies in living systematic reviews (LSRs). The objectives of this study are (1) to assess how published LSRs report on the flow of studies through the different phases of the review for the different updates; (2) to propose an approach to reporting on that flow. : For objective 1, we identified all LSRs published up to April 2021. We abstracted information regarding their general characteristics and how they reported on search results. For objective 2, we based our proposal for tailored PRISMA approaches on the findings from objective 1, as well as on our experience with conducting Cochrane LSRs. We identified 279 living publications relating to 76 LSRs. Of the 279 publications, 11% were protocols, 23% were base versions (i.e., the first version), 50% were partial updates (i.e., does not include all typical sections of an SR), and 16% were full updates (i.e., includes all typical sections of an SR). We identified six ways to reporting the study flow: base separately, each update separately (38%); numbers not reported (32%); latest update separately, all previous versions combined (20%); base separately, all updates combined (7%); latest update version only (3%); all versions combined (0%). We propose recording in detail the results of the searches to keep track of all identified records. For structuring the flow diagram, we propose using one of four approaches. We identified six ways for reporting the study flow through the different phases of the review for the different update versions. We propose to document in detail the study flow for the different search updates and select one of our four tailored PRISMA diagram approaches to present that study flow.

摘要

: 尽管 PRISMA 流程图被广泛用于报告标准系统评价 (SR),但它并非为捕获不断更新的系统评价 (LSR)中的研究结果而设计。本研究的目的是:(1) 评估已发表的 LSR 如何报告不同更新版本的研究在评价各阶段的流程;(2) 提出一种报告该流程的方法。: 为实现目标 1,我们确定了截至 2021 年 4 月发表的所有 LSR。我们提取了有关其一般特征以及如何报告检索结果的信息。为实现目标 2,我们根据目标 1 的发现以及我们进行 Cochrane LSR 的经验,为定制的 PRISMA 方法提出建议。我们确定了 279 篇与 76 篇 LSR 相关的实时出版物。在 279 篇出版物中,11%是方案,23%是基础版本(即第一版),50%是部分更新(即不包括 SR 的所有典型部分),16%是完整更新(即包括 SR 的所有典型部分)。我们确定了六种报告研究流程的方法:基础版本分别报告,每个更新版本分别报告(38%);未报告数量(32%);最新更新版本分别报告,所有以前版本合并报告(20%);基础版本分别报告,所有更新版本合并报告(7%);仅最新更新版本报告(3%);所有版本合并报告(0%)。我们建议详细记录搜索结果,以跟踪所有已识别的记录。为了构建流程图,我们建议使用以下四种方法之一。我们确定了六种在不同更新版本的评价中报告研究流程的方法。我们建议详细记录不同搜索更新的研究流程,并选择我们的四种定制 PRISMA 图方法之一来展示该研究流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/0a056c0233fa/f1000research-10-120090-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/c4ec7118a8ae/f1000research-10-120090-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/e9c651c8e0ba/f1000research-10-120090-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/6f8e9d9ad080/f1000research-10-120090-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/6190ca2d6610/f1000research-10-120090-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/dd71fddd4bf6/f1000research-10-120090-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/0a056c0233fa/f1000research-10-120090-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/c4ec7118a8ae/f1000research-10-120090-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/e9c651c8e0ba/f1000research-10-120090-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/6f8e9d9ad080/f1000research-10-120090-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/6190ca2d6610/f1000research-10-120090-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/dd71fddd4bf6/f1000research-10-120090-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7934/8805089/0a056c0233fa/f1000research-10-120090-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal.针对活体系统综述的定制版 PRISMA 2020 流程图:方法学调查与建议。
F1000Res. 2021 Mar 8;10:192. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51723.3. eCollection 2021.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.系统评价实施、报告、出版和评价方法的指南:范围综述方案。
F1000Res. 2021 Aug 13;10:802. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.55108.1. eCollection 2021.
4
Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey.实时系统评价的实施与报告方法:一项实时方法学调查的方案
F1000Res. 2019 Feb 26;8:221. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18005.2. eCollection 2019.
5
Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing, and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review.系统综述的实施、报告、发表和评价方法及指南:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 14;12(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02396-x.
6
The life and death of living systematic reviews: a methodological survey.生存系统评价的生死:方法学调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;156:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
7
Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (LSRs): protocol.PRISMA 2020声明对实时系统评价(LSR)的扩展:方案
F1000Res. 2022 Jun 10;11:109. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.75449.2. eCollection 2022.
8
Methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 living systematic review: a cross-sectional study.COVID-19 系统综述的方法学质量和报告质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01980-y.
9
Experience report of two living systematic Cochrane reviews on COVID-19.两项关于 COVID-19 的现行系统评价的经验报告。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Mar;184:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.004. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
10
Conceptualizing the reporting of living systematic reviews.概念化系统评价的报告。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;156:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The dynamic trajectory of autistic life and its changing challenges: a scoping review.自闭症患者生活的动态轨迹及其不断变化的挑战:一项范围综述
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07212-5.
2
Enhancing Intraoral Scanning Accuracy: From the Influencing Factors to a Procedural Guideline.提高口内扫描准确性:从影响因素到操作指南
J Clin Med. 2025 May 20;14(10):3562. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103562.
3
Safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of chikungunya vaccines in pregnant persons, children, and adolescents: a protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis.
基孔肯雅热疫苗在孕妇、儿童和青少年中的安全性、免疫原性及有效性:一项实时系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Reprod Health. 2025 Apr 18;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02004-2.
4
Safety, immunogenicity, efficacy, and effectiveness of Lassa fever vaccines in pregnant persons, children, and adolescents: a protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis.拉沙热疫苗在孕妇、儿童和青少年中的安全性、免疫原性、有效性和效力:一项实时系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Reprod Health. 2025 Apr 15;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02008-y.
5
A qualitative systematic review of umbilical cord care practices in Nigeria.尼日利亚脐带护理实践的定性系统评价
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05387-0.
6
Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): checklist and explanation.《系统综述与Meta分析报告的规范(PRISMA)2020声明:针对实时系统综述的扩展(PRISMA-LSR)》:清单及解释
BMJ. 2024 Nov 19;387:e079183. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079183.
7
Participation in the digital transformation of healthcare: a review of qualitative studies.参与医疗保健的数字化转型:定性研究综述。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2024 Nov 15;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):68-84. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2024-0021.
8
A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on the Potential Use of miR-150 as a Novel Biomarker in the Detection and Progression of Multiple Sclerosis.关于miR-150作为多发性硬化症检测和病情进展的新型生物标志物潜在用途的文献综述与荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 31;14(8):815. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080815.
9
Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.照顾者参与的研究:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13940. doi: 10.1111/hex.13940.
10
Effectiveness of Mobile App Interventions to Improve Periodontal Health: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.移动应用程序干预措施改善牙周健康的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 31;13:e50479. doi: 10.2196/50479.