School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre of Applied Health Economics and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Centre for Online Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Nutr Diet. 2022 Feb;79(1):110-128. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12728. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
This systematic review aimed to describe behaviour change theories and techniques used to inform nutrition interventions for adults undergoing bariatric surgery.
A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, PsycInfo, CENTRAL, EMBASE and CINAHL from inception until 09 March 2021. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials involving nutrition interventions performed by a healthcare provider, to adults that were waitlisted or had undergone bariatric surgery and received a nutrition intervention explicitly informed by one or more behaviour change theories or behaviour change techniques. Screening was conducted independently by two authors. Behaviour change techniques were examined using the behaviour change technique taxonomy version one which includes 93 hierarchical techniques clustered into 16 groups. Quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias 2.0.
Twenty-one publications were included, involving 15 studies and 14 interventions, with 1495 participants. Bias was low or had some concerns. Two interventions reported using behaviour change theories (transtheoretical model and self-determination theory). Thirteen behaviour change technique taxonomy groupings and 29 techniques were reported across 14 interventions. Common techniques included '1.2 Problem solving' (n = 9 studies), '3.1 Social support (unspecified)' (n = 9 studies), '1.1 Goal setting (behaviour)' (n = 6 studies) and '2.3 Self-monitoring of behaviour' (n =- 6 studies).
While behaviour change techniques have been included, behaviour change theory is not consistently reported and/or adopted to inform nutrition interventions for adults undergoing bariatric surgery. Integrating behaviour change theory and techniques in nutrition interventions is important for researchers and bariatric surgery teams, including dietitians, to effectively target behaviours for this population.
本系统评价旨在描述用于为接受减重手术的成年人提供营养干预的行为改变理论和技术。
系统检索了 PubMed、PsycInfo、CENTRAL、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库,检索时间从建库至 2021 年 3 月 9 日。纳入的研究为涉及由医疗保健提供者进行的营养干预的随机对照试验,对象为接受减重手术的成年人,这些成年人正在等待或已经接受了营养干预,并明确接受了一个或多个行为改变理论或行为改变技术的指导。两名作者独立进行了筛选。使用行为改变技术分类学 1.0 检查行为改变技术,该分类学包括 93 个层次化技术,分为 16 组。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 2.0 评估纳入研究的质量。
纳入了 21 篇文献,涉及 15 项研究和 14 项干预措施,共 1495 名参与者。偏倚低或存在一些担忧。两项干预措施报告使用了行为改变理论(跨理论模型和自我决定理论)。14 项干预措施共报告了 13 个行为改变技术分类学分组和 29 种技术。常见技术包括“1.2 问题解决”(n=9 项研究)、“3.1 社会支持(未指定)”(n=9 项研究)、“1.1 目标设定(行为)”(n=6 项研究)和“2.3 行为自我监测”(n=6 项研究)。
虽然已经纳入了行为改变技术,但并未一致报告和/或采用行为改变理论来指导接受减重手术的成年人的营养干预。将行为改变理论和技术纳入营养干预对于研究人员和减重手术团队(包括营养师)非常重要,以便有效地针对该人群的行为进行干预。