Suppr超能文献

去甲肾上腺素可能改善低资源环境中脓毒性休克患者的生存:一项关于 ICU 外可行性和疗效的概念验证研究。

Norepinephrine may improve survival of septic shock patients in a low-resource setting: a proof-of-concept study on feasibility and efficacy outside the Intensive Care Unit.

机构信息

S.C. Medicina d'Urgenza U, Molinette Hospital, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.

Scuola di Specializzazione in Medicina d'Emergenza-Urgenza, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Pathog Glob Health. 2022 Sep;116(6):389-394. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2022.2038051. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

Abstract

Septic shock treatment in sub-Saharan African hospitals is challenging due to limited availability of ICUs, central venous catheters, vasopressors, and trained staff. We designed this proof-of-concept study to determine efficacy, safety, and feasibility of norepinephrine (NE) use in a non-intensive setting in a low-resource country, consisting in a peripheral infusion via a mechanical drop counter. Septic shock patients accessing a rural hospital in Uganda were included: the 2020 group (N = 12) was prospectively enrolled (Jan-Mar 2020) when NE was available; the 2019 group (N = 11) was retrospectively enrolled (Oct-Dec 2019). Enrollment was continuous to reduce selection bias. Basic clinical endpoints (noninvasive blood pressure, tissue perfusion, diuresis) defined shock control and the prognostic endpoint was survival at hospital discharge. Shock control at 6 and 12 hours was higher in the 2020 group (p = 0.012 for both). Survival at hospital discharge was 75% and 27.3%, respectively (p = 0.039). NE infusion was associated with a Hazard Ratio of 0.23 (p = 0.041) in a multivariate Cox model. No NE-induced adverse effects were detected. These preliminary results suggest that implementing NE infusion in a low-resource setting without ICU could be a safe and effective strategy in managing septic shock and that this approach could lead to a lower mortality rate.

摘要

在撒哈拉以南非洲的医院中,由于 ICU、中心静脉导管、血管加压药和训练有素的医护人员的数量有限,脓毒性休克的治疗具有挑战性。我们设计了这项概念验证研究,以确定去甲肾上腺素(NE)在资源匮乏国家的非强化环境中使用的疗效、安全性和可行性,该方法包括通过机械滴注计数器进行外周输注。乌干达农村医院收治的脓毒性休克患者被纳入本研究:2020 组(N=12)为前瞻性纳入(2020 年 1 月至 3 月),当时有 NE 可用;2019 组(N=11)为回顾性纳入(2019 年 10 月至 12 月)。连续纳入以减少选择偏倚。基本临床终点(无创血压、组织灌注、利尿)定义为休克控制,预后终点为出院时的存活率。2020 组在 6 小时和 12 小时的休克控制率更高(均为 p=0.012)。出院时的存活率分别为 75%和 27.3%(p=0.039)。多变量 Cox 模型显示,NE 输注的风险比为 0.23(p=0.041)。未发现 NE 引起的不良反应。这些初步结果表明,在没有 ICU 的资源匮乏环境中实施 NE 输注可能是管理脓毒性休克的一种安全有效的策略,这种方法可能会降低死亡率。

相似文献

2
[Safety of administration of norepinephrine through peripheral vein line in patients with septic shock].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):276-280. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200716-00528.
4
5
Terlipressin versus norepinephrine as infusion in patients with septic shock: a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial.
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1816-1825. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5267-9. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
9
Central venous pressure value can assist in adjusting norepinephrine dosage after the initial resuscitation of septic shock.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 May 20;132(10):1159-1165. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000238.
10
Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock.
Crit Care. 2014 Oct 3;18(5):532. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0532-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions, availability and use of vasopressors for septic shock in emergency care settings in Tanzania.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2025 Sep;15(3):100879. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2025.05.003. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades?
Microorganisms. 2023 Sep 4;11(9):2231. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092231.
3
Sepsis Management in Southeast Asia: A Review and Clinical Experience.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 23;11(13):3635. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133635.

本文引用的文献

3
Early Use of Norepinephrine in Septic Shock Resuscitation (CENSER). A Randomized Trial.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 May 1;199(9):1097-1105. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201806-1034OC.
4
Sepsis and septic shock.
Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):75-87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30696-2. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
5
Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Nov 1;111(11):483-489. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try007.
7
Safety of the Peripheral Administration of Vasopressor Agents.
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):26-33. doi: 10.1177/0885066616686035. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
Safety of peripheral intravenous administration of vasoactive medication.
J Hosp Med. 2015 Sep;10(9):581-5. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2394. Epub 2015 May 26.
9
ViEWS--Towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration.
Resuscitation. 2010 Aug;81(8):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.014.
10
Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions.
QJM. 2001 Oct;94(10):521-6. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验