• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室-动脉耦合作为败血症性休克去甲肾上腺素性每搏量反应预测指标的前瞻性队列研究。

Left ventricular-arterial coupling as a predictor of stroke volume response to norepinephrine in septic shock - a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315000, China.

Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315000, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01276-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-021-01276-y
PMID:33596822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7886849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), defined as the ratio of arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), is a key determinant of cardiovascular performance. This study aims to evaluate whether left VAC can predict stroke volume (SV) response to norepinephrine (NE) in septic shock patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted in an intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital in China. We recruited septic shock patients who had persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation and required NE to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 65 mmHg. Those patients in whom the target MAP was not reached after NE infusion were ineligible. Echocardiographic variables were measured before (baseline) and after NE infusion. SV responder was defined by a ≥ 15% increase in SV after NE infusion.

RESULTS

Of 34 septic shock patients included, 19 (56%) were SV responders. Before NE infusion, SV responders had a lower Ees (1.13 ± 0.24 mmHg/mL versus 1.50 ± 0.46 mmHg/mL, P = 0.005) and a higher Ea/Ees ratio (1.47 ± 0.40 versus 1.02 ± 0.30, P = 0.001) than non-responders, and Ea in SV responders was comparable to that in non-responders (1.62 ± 0.36 mmHg/mL versus 1.43 ± 0.28 mmHg/mL, P = 0.092). NE significantly increased Ea and Ees in both groups. The Ea/Ees ratio was normalized by NE administration in SV responders but unchanged in non-responders. The baseline Ea/Ees ratio was positively correlated with NE-induced SV increases (r = 0.688, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that the baseline Ea/Ees ratio was a predictor of SV increases induced by NE (odd ratio 0.008, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000 to 0.293), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.646 to 0.927).

CONCLUSIONS

The left VAC has the ability to predict SV response to NE infusion in septic shock patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024031, Registered 23 June 2019 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=40359&htm=4 .

摘要

背景

左心室-动脉耦合(VAC)定义为动脉弹性(Ea)与左心室收缩末期弹性(Ees)的比值,是心血管性能的关键决定因素。本研究旨在评估左心室 VAC 是否可以预测败血症性休克患者去甲肾上腺素(NE)引起的每搏量(SV)反应。

方法

这是一项在中国一家三级教学医院的重症监护病房进行的前瞻性队列研究。我们招募了败血症性休克患者,这些患者在液体复苏后持续低血压,需要 NE 来维持平均动脉压(MAP)>65mmHg。那些在 NE 输注后目标 MAP 未达到的患者不符合条件。在 NE 输注前后测量超声心动图变量。SV 反应者定义为 NE 输注后 SV 增加≥15%。

结果

在 34 名败血症性休克患者中,有 19 名(56%)是 SV 反应者。在 NE 输注前,SV 反应者的 Ees 较低(1.13±0.24mmHg/mL 与 1.50±0.46mmHg/mL,P=0.005),Ea/Ees 比值较高(1.47±0.40 与 1.02±0.30,P=0.001),而 Ea 在 SV 反应者中与非反应者相当(1.62±0.36mmHg/mL 与 1.43±0.28mmHg/mL,P=0.092)。NE 显著增加了两组的 Ea 和 Ees。SV 反应者的 Ea/Ees 比值在 NE 给药后得到了正常化,而非反应者则没有变化。基线 Ea/Ees 比值与 NE 诱导的 SV 增加呈正相关(r=0.688,P<0.001)。逻辑回归分析表明,基线 Ea/Ees 比值是 NE 诱导的 SV 增加的预测因子(比值比 0.008,95%置信区间(CI):0.000 至 0.293),受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.816(95%CI:0.646 至 0.927)。

结论

左心室 VAC 能够预测败血症性休克患者对 NE 输注的 SV 反应。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR1900024031,注册于 2019 年 6 月 23 日-回顾性注册,http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=40359&htm=4。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/4346b4c3ea76/12871_2021_1276_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/9158e2603d2b/12871_2021_1276_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/916829577c10/12871_2021_1276_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/c97af35198eb/12871_2021_1276_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/4346b4c3ea76/12871_2021_1276_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/9158e2603d2b/12871_2021_1276_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/916829577c10/12871_2021_1276_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/c97af35198eb/12871_2021_1276_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16df/7887797/4346b4c3ea76/12871_2021_1276_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Left ventricular-arterial coupling as a predictor of stroke volume response to norepinephrine in septic shock - a prospective cohort study.左心室-动脉耦合作为败血症性休克去甲肾上腺素性每搏量反应预测指标的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01276-y.
2
Optimizing left ventricular-arterial coupling during the initial resuscitation in septic shock - a pilot prospective randomized study.优化脓毒性休克初始复苏期间的左心室-动脉耦联:一项前瞻性随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01553-w.
3
Cardiovascular determinants of resuscitation from sepsis and septic shock.从脓毒症和感染性休克中复苏的心血管决定因素。
Crit Care. 2019 Apr 15;23(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2414-9.
4
[The predictive value of dynamic arterial elastance in arterial pressure response after norepinephrine dosage reduction in patients with septic shock].[动态动脉弹性对感染性休克患者去甲肾上腺素减量后动脉压反应的预测价值]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 1;56(5):344-348. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2017.05.008.
5
Prognostic value of left ventricular-arterial coupling in elderly patients with septic shock.左心室-动脉耦联对老年感染性休克患者的预后价值。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:289-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
Heart rate reduction with esmolol is associated with improved arterial elastance in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study.艾司洛尔降低心率与感染性休克患者动脉弹性改善相关:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1528-1534. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
7
Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling Analysis Predicts the Hemodynamic Response to Norepinephrine in Hypotensive Postoperative Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.心室-动脉耦合分析预测低血压术后患者对去甲肾上腺素的血流动力学反应:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):e17-e25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002772.
8
[Effective arterial elastance in evaluating the fluid challenge in septic shock patients].[有效动脉弹性在评估脓毒症休克患者液体复苏中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):269-275. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201222-00769.
9
Dynamic arterial elastance predicts mean arterial pressure decrease associated with decreasing norepinephrine dosage in septic shock.动态动脉弹性可预测脓毒性休克中随着去甲肾上腺素剂量减少而出现的平均动脉压下降。
Crit Care. 2015 Jan 19;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0732-5.
10
Effects of norepinephrine plus dobutamine or norepinephrine alone on left ventricular performance of septic shock patients.去甲肾上腺素联合多巴酚丁胺或单独使用去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克患者左心室功能的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1708-13. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
The Anrep effect in septic shock: a mechanism of cardiac adaptation.脓毒性休克中的安雷普效应:心脏适应的一种机制。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;134(4):1204-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.023. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
Ventriculo-arterial coupling: from physiological concept to clinical application in peri-operative care and ICUs.心室-动脉耦合:从生理概念到围手术期护理和重症监护病房的临床应用
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2022 Aug 3;1(2):e004. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000004. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Critical Care Ultrasound in Shock: A Comprehensive Review of Ultrasound Protocol for Hemodynamic Assessment in the Intensive Care Unit.

本文引用的文献

1
Fluid expansion improve ventriculo-arterial coupling in preload-dependent patients: a prospective observational study.液体扩张改善前负荷依赖性患者的心室-动脉耦联:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01087-7.
2
Understanding ventriculo-arterial coupling.理解心室-动脉耦合。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):795. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.04.10.
3
Early norepinephrine use in septic shock.脓毒性休克早期使用去甲肾上腺素。
休克中的重症监护超声:重症监护病房血流动力学评估超声方案的全面综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 10;13(18):5344. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185344.
4
Commentary: Ventriculo-arterial (un)coupling in septic shock: impact of current and upcoming hemodynamic drugs.述评:脓毒性休克中的心室-动脉(不)耦联:现有及即将出现的血流动力学药物的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 14;10:1320213. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1320213. eCollection 2023.
5
Ventriculo-arterial (un)coupling in septic shock: Impact of current and upcoming hemodynamic drugs.脓毒性休克中的心室-动脉(不)耦合:现有及即将出现的血流动力学药物的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 30;10:1172703. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1172703. eCollection 2023.
6
Role of Electromechanical Dyssynchrony Assessment During Acute Circulatory Failure and Its Relation to Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling.急性循环衰竭期间机电失同步评估的作用及其与心室-动脉耦联的关系
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 21;9:907891. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.907891. eCollection 2022.
7
Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling Is Associated With Oxygen Consumption and Tissue Perfusion in Acute Circulatory Failure.心室-动脉耦合与急性循环衰竭时的氧消耗及组织灌注相关。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 23;9:842554. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842554. eCollection 2022.
8
Overcoming the Limits of Ejection Fraction and Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Heart Failure.克服心力衰竭中射血分数和心室-动脉耦合的限制
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 21;8:750965. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.750965. eCollection 2021.
9
Optimizing left ventricular-arterial coupling during the initial resuscitation in septic shock - a pilot prospective randomized study.优化脓毒性休克初始复苏期间的左心室-动脉耦联:一项前瞻性随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01553-w.
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S72-S77. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.50.
4
Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲和北美的脓毒性休克发病率和死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2019 May 31;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6.
5
Norepinephrine, more than a vasopressor.去甲肾上腺素,不止是一种血管加压药。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Mar;7(Suppl 1):S25. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.01.76.
6
Measuring cardiac output at the bedside.床边心输出量测量。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Jun;25(3):266-272. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000599.
7
The role of ventricular-arterial coupling in cardiac disease and heart failure: assessment, clinical implications and therapeutic interventions. A consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta & Peripheral Vascular Diseases, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and Heart Failure Association.心室-动脉偶联在心脏疾病和心力衰竭中的作用:评估、临床意义和治疗干预。欧洲心脏病学会工作组主动脉及外周血管疾病、欧洲心血管影像协会和心力衰竭协会的共识文件。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;21(4):402-424. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1436. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Current use of vasopressors in septic shock.血管活性药物在感染性休克中的当前应用。
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0498-7.
9
Validation and Critical Evaluation of the Effective Arterial Elastance in Critically Ill Patients.危重症患者有效动脉弹性的验证和关键评估。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;47(4):e317-e324. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003645.
10
Norepinephrine in septic shock.脓毒症休克中的去甲肾上腺素
Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):687-689. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5499-8. Epub 2019 Jan 10.