Department of Physiotherapy, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology Hisar-Delhi Bypass Road, Hisar, India.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Jul 3;39(7):1391-1405. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2037032. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
The study aims to assess the effect of spinal mobilization and postural correction exercises in patients suffering from cervicogenic headache.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 72 patients. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups: spinal mobilization ( = 24), postural correction exercises ( = 24), and control group ( = 24). The primary outcome measure was headache impact test-6, and secondary outcomes were headache intensity, neck pain intensity, and neck pain-related disability measured at baseline, postintervention, and follow-up period.
Comparison of baseline data (at 0 weeks) among groups showed a statistically nonsignificant difference. There was statistically significant improvement at postintervention (immediately after fourth week) in postural correction exercises group [headache disability: 14.95 ± 7.91 ( < .001); headache intensity: 2.58 ± 1.24 ( < .001); neck disability: 27.66 ± 18.71 ( < .001); neck pain: 1.91 ± 1.44 ( < .001)] and spinal mobilization group [headache disability: 13.83 ± 6.21 ( < .001); headache intensity: 2.29 ± 1.23 ( < .001); neck disability: 23.39 ± 19.51 ( < .001); neck pain: 1.72 ± 0.84 ( < .001)] as compared to the control group. The result of within-group analysis suggests that there was a statistically significant improvement in postintervention (immediately after fourth week) and follow-up (immediately after eighth week) scores as compared to baseline (at 0 weeks) scores for all outcomes in postural correction exercises [headache disability ( < .001), headache intensity ( < .001), neck disability ( < .001), neck pain ( < 0 .001)] as well as in spinal mobilization group [headache disability ( < .001), headache intensity ( < .001), neck disability ( < .001), neck pain ( < .001 for pre versus post; = .001 for pre versus follow-up)]. There was a statistically nonsignificant difference between postintervention and follow-up scores of all the outcomes in the postural correction exercise and spinal mobilization group, which indicates that improvement in these groups was maintained during the follow-up period.
Spinal mobilization and postural correction exercises are effective in the management of cervicogenic headache.
研究旨在评估脊柱松动术和姿势矫正练习对颈源性头痛患者的影响。
采用随机对照试验,共纳入 72 例患者。患者随机分为三组:脊柱松动组(n=24)、姿势矫正练习组(n=24)和对照组(n=24)。主要结局测量指标为头痛影响测试-6(HIT-6),次要结局测量指标为头痛强度、颈痛强度和颈痛相关残疾,分别在基线、干预后和随访期间进行测量。
组间基线数据(0 周)比较无统计学显著性差异。姿势矫正练习组和脊柱松动组在干预后(第 4 周后立即)均有统计学显著改善[头痛残疾:14.95±7.91( < .001);头痛强度:2.58±1.24( < .001);颈部残疾:27.66±18.71( < .001);颈痛:1.91±1.44( < .001)]和脊柱松动组[头痛残疾:13.83±6.21( < .001);头痛强度:2.29±1.23( < .001);颈部残疾:23.39±19.51( < .001);颈痛:1.72±0.84( < .001)],与对照组相比。组内分析结果表明,与基线(0 周)相比,所有结局的干预后(第 4 周后立即)和随访(第 8 周后立即)评分均有统计学显著改善,在姿势矫正练习组中[头痛残疾( < .001)、头痛强度( < .001)、颈部残疾( < .001)、颈痛( < 0.001)],以及在脊柱松动组中[头痛残疾( < .001)、头痛强度( < .001)、颈部残疾( < .001)、颈痛( < .001,预 vs 后; = .001,预 vs 随访)]。在姿势矫正练习组和脊柱松动组中,干预后和随访时所有结局的评分无统计学显著性差异,这表明这些组在随访期间的改善得以维持。
脊柱松动术和姿势矫正练习对颈源性头痛的治疗有效。