• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于炎症标志物联合应用的危重症患者脓毒症两种预测模型的比较

Comparison of Two Predictive Models of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Based on the Combined Use of Inflammatory Markers.

作者信息

Li Xiaoming, Liu Chao, Wang Xiaoli, Mao Zhi, Yi Hongyu, Zhou Feihu

机构信息

Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2022 Feb 2;15:1013-1022. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S348797. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S348797
PMID:35140504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8818968/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response due to infection, resulting in organ dysfunction. Timely targeted interventions can improve prognosis. Inflammation plays a crucial role in the process of sepsis. To identify potential sepsis early, we developed and validated a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model for predicting sepsis in critically ill patients.

METHODS

The medical records of adult patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from August 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). A nomogram model was developed through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The continuous variables included in nomogram model were transformed into dichotomous variables. Then, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed based on these dichotomous variables, and the odds ratio (OR) for each variable was used to construct a simple risk scoring model. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 2074 patients were enrolled. Finally, white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were included in our models. The AUC of the nomogram model and the simple risk scoring model were 0.854 and 0.842, respectively. The prediction performance of the two models on sepsis is comparable (p = 0.1298).

CONCLUSION

This study combining five commonly available inflammatory markers (WBC, CRP, IL-6, PCT and NLR) developed a nomogram model and a simple risk scoring model to predict sepsis in critically ill patients. Although the prediction performance of the two models is comparable, the simple risk scoring model may be simpler and more practical for clinicians to identify potential sepsis in critically ill patients at an early stage and strategize treatments.

摘要

背景

脓毒症是由感染引起的全身炎症反应,可导致器官功能障碍。及时的针对性干预可改善预后。炎症在脓毒症过程中起关键作用。为了早期识别潜在的脓毒症,我们开发并验证了一种列线图模型和一种简单的风险评分模型,用于预测重症患者的脓毒症。

方法

分析了2017年8月至2020年12月入住我们重症监护病房(ICU)的成年患者的病历。患者被随机分为训练队列(70%)和验证队列(30%)。通过多因素逻辑回归分析建立列线图模型。将列线图模型中包含的连续变量转换为二分变量。然后,基于这些二分变量进行多因素逻辑回归分析,并使用每个变量的比值比(OR)构建简单的风险评分模型。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

共纳入2074例患者。最终,我们的模型纳入了白细胞(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、降钙素原(PCT)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)。列线图模型和简单风险评分模型的AUC分别为0.854和0.842。两种模型对脓毒症的预测性能相当(p = 0.1298)。

结论

本研究结合五种常用的炎症标志物(WBC、CRP、IL-6、PCT和NLR)开发了一种列线图模型和一种简单的风险评分模型,以预测重症患者的脓毒症。虽然两种模型的预测性能相当,但简单风险评分模型可能更简单、更实用,便于临床医生在早期识别重症患者潜在的脓毒症并制定治疗策略。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Two Predictive Models of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Based on the Combined Use of Inflammatory Markers.基于炎症标志物联合应用的危重症患者脓毒症两种预测模型的比较
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Feb 2;15:1013-1022. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S348797. eCollection 2022.
2
[Formulation of combined predictive indicators using logistic regression model in predicting sepsis and prognosis].[运用逻辑回归模型构建联合预测指标以预测脓毒症及预后]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):139-144. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.009.
3
Establishment of a mortality risk nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis: cohort study from a Chinese single center.建立用于预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率的死亡风险列线图:来自中国单中心的队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 3;11:1360197. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1360197. eCollection 2024.
4
Value of CRP, PCT, and NLR in Prediction of Severity and Prognosis of Patients With Bloodstream Infections and Sepsis.CRP、PCT和NLR在预测血流感染和脓毒症患者严重程度及预后中的价值
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 7;9:857218. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.857218. eCollection 2022.
5
[Value of Hepcidin as a diagnostic biomarker of sepsis in critically ill adults].[铁调素作为危重症成年患者脓毒症诊断生物标志物的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jul;30(7):652-657. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.07.007.
6
[The prognostic value of serum procalcitonin on severity of illness in non-sepsis critically ill patients].[血清降钙素原对非脓毒症危重症患者病情严重程度的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;28(8):688-93. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.08.004.
7
[Combined predictive value of the risk factors influencing the short-term prognosis of sepsis].[影响脓毒症短期预后的危险因素的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Mar;32(3):307-312. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200306-00218.
8
[A new warning scoring system establishment for prediction of sepsis in patients with trauma in intensive care unit].[一种用于预测重症监护病房创伤患者脓毒症的新预警评分系统的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Apr;31(4):422-427. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.010.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of Various Biomarkers of Sepsis (Serum Pro-Calcitonin, High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein, and C-reactive Protein) and Band Cell Percentage in Critically lll Patients: A Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study.脓毒症多种生物标志物(血清降钙素原、高敏C反应蛋白和C反应蛋白)及杆状核细胞百分比在危重症患者中的诊断准确性:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;14(4):615-619. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_3_21. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
[Analysis of prognosis risk factors of critically ill patients after cardiac surgery: a consecutive 5-year retrospective study].心脏手术后危重症患者预后危险因素分析:一项连续5年的回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Jul;31(7):873-877. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.07.015.

引用本文的文献

1
An externally validated prognostic model for critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤重症患者的外部验证预后模型。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Sep;11(9):2350-2359. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52148. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
2
An Analysis of Predictive Factors for Severe Neonatal Infection and the Construction of a Prediction Model.新生儿重症感染预测因素分析及预测模型构建
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jun 5;16:3561-3574. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S408126. eCollection 2023.
3
The Potential Role of Neutrophil-Reactive Intensity (NEUT-RI) in the Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Construction and Evaluation of a Sepsis Risk Prediction Model for Urinary Tract Infection.尿路感染脓毒症风险预测模型的构建与评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 21;8:671184. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.671184. eCollection 2021.
2
The Advancement in Detecting Sepsis and Its Outcome: Usefulness of Procalcitonin in Diagnosing Sepsis and Predicting Fatal Outcomes in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit.脓毒症检测及其预后的进展:降钙素原在诊断脓毒症及预测重症监护病房患者致命结局中的应用价值
Cureus. 2021 Apr 12;13(4):e14439. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14439.
3
Development and Validation of a Sepsis Mortality Risk Score for Sepsis-3 Patients in Intensive Care Unit.
中性粒细胞反应强度(NEUT-RI)在危重症患者脓毒症诊断中的潜在作用:一项回顾性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(10):1781. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101781.
4
Discriminatory capacity of serum interleukin-6 between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children: a prospective validation study.血清白细胞介素-6对儿童单纯性和复杂性急性阑尾炎的鉴别能力:一项前瞻性验证研究。
World J Pediatr. 2022 Dec;18(12):810-817. doi: 10.1007/s12519-022-00598-2. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
重症监护病房中脓毒症3患者的脓毒症死亡风险评分的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 21;7:609769. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.609769. eCollection 2020.
4
[Sepsis incidence in Germany and worldwide : Current knowledge and limitations of research using health claims data].[德国及全球的脓毒症发病率:利用健康声明数据进行研究的现状与局限]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 May;117(4):264-268. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00777-5. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
5
A novel procalcitonin-based score for detecting sepsis among critically ill patients.一种新型降钙素原为基础的评分系统用于检测危重症患者脓毒症。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245748. eCollection 2021.
6
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Alternative Marker of Neonatal Sepsis in Developing Countries.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为发展中国家新生儿败血症的替代标志物
Oman Med J. 2021 Jan 6;36(1):e214. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.05. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Impact Factors and an Efficient Nomogram for Predicting the Occurrence of Sepsis after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术后脓毒症发生的影响因素及有效列线图预测
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 22;2020:6081768. doi: 10.1155/2020/6081768. eCollection 2020.
8
The Diagnostic Performance of Interleukin-6 and C-Reactive Protein for Early Identification of Neonatal Sepsis.白细胞介素-6和C反应蛋白对新生儿败血症早期识别的诊断效能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;10(11):978. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10110978.
9
Predictive values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对 COVID-19 患者疾病严重程度和死亡率的预测价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Nov 16;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03374-8.
10
Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data Using Ratio and Power-Based Features.基于比率和幂律特征的临床数据脓毒症早期预测。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):e1343-e1349. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004691.