Mozingo Joseph D, Schuring Lindsay L, Mortensen Alexander J, Anderson Andrew E, Aoki Stephen K
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Feb 4;10(2):23259671211073834. doi: 10.1177/23259671211073834. eCollection 2022 Feb.
The anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) is used to quantify anterior coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum. However, its measurement has not been evaluated in a manner consistent with routine use, and the precise 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic location where it measures coverage is not known.
To determine the effect of patient positioning on ACEA measurement reliability, magnitude, and 3D location.
Descriptive laboratory study.
Included were 18 adults; 7 participants had cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, and 11 participants had no radiographic evidence of hip abnormalities and no history of hip pain or injuries. Ultimately, 3D femur and pelvis models were generated from computed tomography images. Radiographs were generated with the models in different degrees of pelvic rotation, tilt, and obliquity relative to the standard false-profile view. The ACEA was measured by 2 raters by selecting the location of the bone edge on each radiograph. Selections were projected onto the pelvis model and expressed as a clockface location on the acetabular rim. The clockface was mirrored on left hips to allow a direct comparison of locations between hips. Interrater and intrarater reliability were quantified via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effect of position on ACEA measurements and clockface locations was determined via linear regression.
Intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC ≥0.97 for all). For every degree increase in rotation, tilt, and obliquity, the ACEA changed by +0.53°, +0.93°, and -0.04°, respectively. The mean clockface location (hour:minute:second) in the false-profile view was 2:09:32 ± 0:12:00 and changed by +0:02:08, -0:00:35, and -0:00:05 for every degree increase in rotation, tilt, and obliquity, respectively.
ACEA measurements were reliable even with differences in patient positioning. Rotation and tilt were associated with notable changes in ACEA measurements. ACEA bone edge measurements mapped to the anterosuperior acetabular rim, typically in proximity to the anterior inferior iliac spine. Mapped location was most sensitive to rotation.
Pelvic rotation and tilt affected ACEA measurements, which could alter the clinical classification and treatment of borderline abnormalities. Rotation in particular must be well controlled during patient imaging to preserve measurement reliability and accuracy and to describe coverage from the intended 3D rim location.
前中心边缘角(ACEA)用于量化髋臼对股骨头的前侧覆盖情况。然而,其测量方法尚未按照常规使用方式进行评估,并且其测量覆盖范围的精确三维(3D)解剖位置尚不清楚。
确定患者体位对ACEA测量可靠性、大小及3D位置的影响。
描述性实验室研究。
纳入18名成年人;7名参与者有凸轮形态和股骨髋臼撞击综合征,11名参与者无髋关节异常的影像学证据且无髋关节疼痛或损伤史。最终,从计算机断层扫描图像生成3D股骨和骨盆模型。使用这些模型生成相对于标准假侧位视图具有不同程度骨盆旋转、倾斜和斜度的X线片。由两名评估者通过在每张X线片上选择骨边缘的位置来测量ACEA。所选位置投影到骨盆模型上,并表示为髋臼边缘上的钟面位置。钟面在左髋部进行镜像处理,以便直接比较两侧髋关节的位置。通过组内相关系数(ICC)对评估者间和评估者内的可靠性进行量化。通过线性回归确定体位对ACEA测量值和钟面位置的影响。
评估者内和评估者间的可靠性均极佳(所有ICC≥0.97)。旋转、倾斜和斜度每增加1度,ACEA分别变化+0.53°、+0.93°和 -0.04°。假侧位视图中的平均钟面位置(时:分:秒)为2:09:32 ± 0:12:00,旋转、倾斜和斜度每增加1度,分别变化+0:02:08、-0:00:35和 -0:00:05。
即使患者体位存在差异,ACEA测量仍具有可靠性。旋转和倾斜与ACEA测量的显著变化相关。ACEA骨边缘测量映射到髋臼前上缘,通常靠近髂前下棘。映射位置对旋转最为敏感。
骨盆旋转和倾斜会影响ACEA测量,这可能会改变临界异常的临床分类和治疗。在患者成像过程中,尤其必须很好地控制旋转,以保持测量的可靠性和准确性,并从预期的3D边缘位置描述覆盖情况。