• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨盆旋转和倾斜的变化是否会影响假侧位片上前中心边缘角的测量?尸体研究。

Do Changes in Pelvic Rotation and Tilt Affect Measurement of the Anterior Center Edge Angle on False Profile Radiographs? A Cadaveric Study.

机构信息

S. M. Putnam, J. C. Clohisy, J. J. Nepple, Washington University Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1066-1072. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000636.

DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000636
PMID:30801276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6494305/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The false profile radiograph assesses acetabular coverage in prearthritic hip conditions. Precise rotation of this radiograph is difficult to obtain, so the clinician must interpret radiographs with nonstandard pelvic rotation or tilt, despite limited evidence of how this may affect the anterior center edge angle measurement.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does pelvic rotation alter the measurement of the anterior center edge angle on false profile views? (2) Does pelvic tilt alter the measurement of the anterior center edge angle on false profile views? (3) Is there an objective way to assess appropriate pelvic rotation for the false profile view?

METHODS

Eight cadaver hips (four female, four male; one hip randomly selected per pelvis) were included in the study. Hips with degenerative changes, evidence of previous fracture or trauma, or previous surgical intervention were excluded. Specimens were between 68 to 92 years of age (median, 76 years). The specimens were fixed to a custom jig, and radiographs were taken at 5° intervals of rotation (45-85°) and 5° intervals of pelvic tilt (+10° to -10°). The primary outcome variable, anterior center edge angle, was measured for each rotation and tilt.

RESULTS

Every degree increase in pelvic rotation toward a true lateral resulted in 0.18° increase in the anterior center edge angle (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.29; p = 0.002). For every degree increase in pelvic tilt, the anterior center edge angle increased 0.65° (95% CI, 0.5-0.8; p < 0.001). We verified that standard pelvic rotation of 65° for a false profile radiograph was present when the space between the femoral heads is 66% to 100% of the diameter of the femoral head being imaged.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the anterior center edge angle increases as pelvic tilt increases, with a 6° increase in anterior center edge angle for each 10° increase in pelvic tilt. Since the false profile radiograph is obtained standing, the patient should be counseled to avoid adopting a forced posture, ensuring the radiograph remains an accurate functional representation of the patient's anatomy. In contrast, pelvic rotation did not influence the anterior center edge angle by an important margin, and while we recommend that radiographs continue to be obtained with standardized pelvic rotation, aberrant pelvic rotation will likely not result in a clinically meaningful difference in anterior center edge angle measurements. In the future, studies to identify the specific regions of acetabular anatomy that constitute the radiographic measurement of the anterior center edge angle would enhance current understanding of the associated radiographic anatomy, and consequently improve the ability of the surgeon to treat the specific area of pathology.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In practice, the clinician should pay close attention to pelvic tilt, as a 10° change in tilt may cause 6° of change in the anterior center edge angle. However, false profile radiographs obtained within ± 20° of the targeted 65° of rotation will result in less than 4° change in the anterior center edge angle.

摘要

背景

假关节位 X 线片评估髋关节关节炎前的髋臼覆盖情况。由于很难准确地获得该 X 线片的旋转,因此临床医生必须在骨盆旋转或倾斜的非标准情况下解读 X 线片,尽管目前还没有充分的证据表明这会如何影响前中心边缘角的测量。

问题/目的:(1)骨盆旋转是否会改变假关节位 X 线片上前中心边缘角的测量值?(2)骨盆倾斜是否会改变假关节位 X 线片上前中心边缘角的测量值?(3)是否有一种客观的方法来评估假关节位 X 线片的适当骨盆旋转?

方法

本研究纳入了 8 具尸体髋(4 具女性,4 具男性;每具骨盆随机选择 1 髋)。排除了有退行性改变、有先前骨折或外伤史或先前手术干预的髋关节。标本的年龄在 68 至 92 岁之间(中位数,76 岁)。将标本固定在定制夹具上,以 5°的旋转间隔(45-85°)和 5°的骨盆倾斜间隔(+10°至-10°)拍摄 X 线片。每个旋转和倾斜角度都测量了主要观察变量,即前中心边缘角。

结果

骨盆向真正的侧方每旋转 1 度,前中心边缘角就会增加 0.18°(95%置信区间,0.07-0.29;p = 0.002)。骨盆每倾斜 1 度,前中心边缘角就会增加 0.65°(95%置信区间,0.5-0.8;p < 0.001)。我们验证了,当股骨头之间的空间为成像股骨头直径的 66%至 100%时,假关节位 X 线片的标准骨盆旋转为 65°。

结论

本研究表明,前中心边缘角随骨盆倾斜度的增加而增加,骨盆倾斜每增加 10°,前中心边缘角增加 6°。由于假关节位 X 线片是在站立位拍摄的,因此应告知患者避免采取强制姿势,以确保 X 线片仍然准确地反映患者的解剖结构。相比之下,骨盆旋转对前中心边缘角的影响并不重要,虽然我们建议继续使用标准化的骨盆旋转来获取 X 线片,但异常的骨盆旋转不太可能导致前中心边缘角测量值出现有临床意义的差异。未来,对确定构成前中心边缘角影像学测量的髋臼解剖特定区域的研究将增强对相关影像学解剖的理解,从而提高外科医生治疗特定部位病变的能力。

临床意义

在实践中,临床医生应密切关注骨盆倾斜度,因为倾斜度的 10°变化可能导致前中心边缘角的 6°变化。但是,在目标 65°旋转的±20°范围内获得的假关节位 X 线片,前中心边缘角的变化将小于 4°。

相似文献

1
Do Changes in Pelvic Rotation and Tilt Affect Measurement of the Anterior Center Edge Angle on False Profile Radiographs? A Cadaveric Study.骨盆旋转和倾斜的变化是否会影响假侧位片上前中心边缘角的测量?尸体研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1066-1072. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000636.
2
The anterior center edge angle in Lequesne's false profile view: interrater correlation, dependence on pelvic tilt and correlation to anterior acetabular coverage in the sagital plane. A cadaver study.勒凯斯内氏假轮廓视图中的前中心边缘角:评分者间的相关性、对骨盆倾斜的依赖性以及与矢状面髋臼前覆盖的相关性。一项尸体研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jun;129(6):787-91. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0694-7. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
3
Effect of Patient Positioning on Measurement of the Anterior Center-Edge Angle on False-Profile Radiographs and Its 3-Dimensional Mapping to the Acetabular Rim.患者体位对假侧位X线片上前中心边缘角测量的影响及其向髋臼边缘的三维映射
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Feb 4;10(2):23259671211073834. doi: 10.1177/23259671211073834. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Does Acetabular Coverage Vary Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Patients with Hip Dysplasia?髋臼覆盖在髋关节发育不良患者的仰卧位和站立位之间是否不同?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2455-2466. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000898.
5
Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt?哪些髋关节影像学参数无需针对骨盆旋转和倾斜进行校正?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1255-66. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3936-8.
6
Revisiting the Anteroinferior Iliac Spine: Is the Subspine Pathologic? A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation.重新审视髂前下棘:棘下是否存在病理性改变?一项临床和影像学评估。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jul;476(7):1494-1502. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533626.25502.e1.
7
Use of the False-Profile Radiographic View to Measure Pelvic Incidence.应用假透视投照测量骨盆入射角。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2089-2095. doi: 10.1177/0363546518780938.
8
Does Pelvic Rotation Alter Radiologic Measurement of Anterior and Lateral Acetabular Coverage?骨盆旋转是否改变髋臼前侧和外侧覆盖的放射学测量?
Arthroscopy. 2019 Apr;35(4):1111-1116.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.135. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
How Does Radiographic Acetabular Morphology Change Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Asymptomatic Volunteers?无症状志愿者仰卧位和站立位时髋臼的放射学形态变化如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1550-1561. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003073. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
10
Does Compensatory Anterior Pelvic Tilt Decrease After Bilateral Periacetabular Osteotomy?双侧髋臼周围截骨术后补偿性前骨盆倾斜是否减少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1168-1175. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000560.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of a Horizontal Reference Line While Measuring the Anterior Center Edge Angle Is More Reliable Than the Traditional Method.在测量前中心边缘角时使用水平参考线比传统方法更可靠。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Aug 8;13(8):23259671251360343. doi: 10.1177/23259671251360343. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Radiographic evaluation of the painful adolescent and young adult hip.疼痛性青少年及青年成人髋关节的影像学评估
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Apr 3;7:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100039. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Triple-Osteotomy leads to substantially improved quality of life in patients with hip dysplasia.三联截骨术可显著改善髋关节发育不良患者的生活质量。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 7;12(1):e70208. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70208. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Radiographically Apparent Acetabular Sourcil Landmarks Are Created by Comparable Regions of the Pelvis With Extraarticular Bone Variably Confounding Estimates of Joint Coverage.影像学上明显的髋臼眉弓标志是由骨盆的可比区域形成的,关节外骨骼的变化会混淆关节覆盖范围的估计。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):343-358. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003268. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
5
Evaluation of the anterior acetabular coverage with a false profile radiograph considering appropriate range of positioning.考虑到合适的定位范围,用假性骨盆正位片评估髋臼前缘覆盖。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 22;13(1):8288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35514-9.
6
[Progress in diagnosis and hip arthroscopic treatment of borderline developmental dysplasia of hip with Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement].[髋关节边缘型发育性发育不良合并凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症的诊断与髋关节镜治疗进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 May 15;37(5):629-634. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202301058.
7
Evaluation of lateral and anterior center-edge angles according to sex and anterior pelvic plane tilt angle: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis.根据性别和骨盆前倾斜角评估侧位和前中心边缘角:三维定量分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Apr 5;18(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03763-z.
8
Effect of Patient Positioning on Measurement of the Anterior Center-Edge Angle on False-Profile Radiographs and Its 3-Dimensional Mapping to the Acetabular Rim.患者体位对假侧位X线片上前中心边缘角测量的影响及其向髋臼边缘的三维映射
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Feb 4;10(2):23259671211073834. doi: 10.1177/23259671211073834. eCollection 2022 Feb.
9
Rear drop: a new radiographic landmark for estimation of pelvic tilt on pelvis AP radiographs.后方垂直线:骨盆前后位X线片上用于评估骨盆倾斜度的一个新的影像学标志。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021 May 5;8(1):58-66. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnab037. eCollection 2021 Jan.
10
Radiographic and clinical characteristics associated with a positive PART (Prone Apprehension Relocation Test): a new provocative exam to elicit hip instability.与阳性 PART(俯卧位恐惧复位试验)相关的影像学和临床特征:一种引发髋关节不稳定的新激发性检查。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Jun 29;7(2):288-297. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa021. eCollection 2020 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiographic Identification of Arthroscopically Relevant Acetabular Structures.关节镜相关髋臼结构的影像学识别
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):67-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546515612083. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
2
Radiographic identification of the primary lateral ankle structures.踝关节外侧主要结构的影像学识别。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):79-87. doi: 10.1177/0363546514553778. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
3
Reliability of overcoverage parameters with varying morphologic pincer features: comparison of EOS® and radiography.不同形态钳夹特征下过覆盖参数的可靠性:EOS®与放射摄影的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2578-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3001-z. Epub 2013 May 9.
4
Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.后交叉韧带重建中隧道定位的影像学标志。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):35-42. doi: 10.1177/0363546512465072. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
5
Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement?普通 X 线片与 CT 对于凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症的影像学检查有相关性吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3313-20. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2510-5.
6
Clinical presentation of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in skeletally mature patients.髋臼发育不良的症状在骨骼成熟患者中的临床表现。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May;93 Suppl 2:17-21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01735.
7
Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures.膝关节内侧主要结构的影像学识别。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91(3):521-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00909.
8
Radiographic identification of the primary posterolateral knee structures.膝关节后外侧主要结构的影像学识别
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):542-51. doi: 10.1177/0363546508328117.
9
Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement.有症状的前髋关节撞击症患者的临床表现。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):638-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0680-y. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
10
A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.一种针对年轻成人髋关节X线平片评估的系统方法。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):47-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00756.