Yang Daniel S, Patel Shyam A, DiSilvestro Kevin J, Li Neill Y, Daniels Alan H
Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, United States.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, United States.
N Am Spine Soc J. 2020 Aug 7;3:100017. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100017. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Complication rates following occipitocervical and atlanto-axial fusion are high. While methods to fuse the upper cervical spine levels have evolved, complication rates and surgical survivorship of occipitocervical fusion versus atlanto-axial fusion are incompletely understood.
The PearlDiver Research Program (www.pearldiverinc.com) was used to identify patients undergoing primary occipitocervical or atlanto-axial fusion between 2007 and 2017. Incidence of each fusion procedure was studied across time. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day readmission, 30-day medical complications, and post-operative opioid utilization at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months between cohorts, controlling for age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and indication for surgery. Risk of revision was compared through Cox-proportional hazards modeling, Kaplan-Meier survival, and log-rank test.
Cohorts of 483 occipitocervical fusions and 737 atlanto-axial fusions were examined. From 2008 to 2016, incidence of occipitocervical fusion rose 55.9%, whereas atlanto-axial fusion rose 21.6%. A greater percentage of atlanto-axial fusions were due to trauma (69.9% vs. 50.5%), whereas a greater percentage of occipitocervical fusions were due to degenerative disease (41.6% vs. 29.4%) ( = 0.0161). Total 30-day complications were seen in 40.9% of occipitocervical fusion patients compared to 26.3% of atlanto-axial fusion patients (aOR=2.06, < 0.0001). Risk of surgical site infection was increased (aOR=2.59, = 0.0075). Kaplan Meier survival analysis and Cox-proportional hazards demonstrated greater risk of revision following surgery for occipitocervical fusion (log rank: < 0.0001, aHR=2.66, 95%CI 1.73-4.10, < 0.0001).
Rates of occipitocervical and atlanto-axial fusion are rising, while complication and revision surgery rates remain high, with occipiticervical fusion leading to higher rates even after controlling for patient characteristics and surgical indication. Spine surgeons should be cautious when considering fusion of the occipitocervical levels if atlanto-axial fusion could be performed safely and provide adequate stabilization to treat the same pathology.
枕颈融合术和寰枢椎融合术后的并发症发生率很高。虽然上颈椎节段融合的方法不断发展,但枕颈融合术与寰枢椎融合术的并发症发生率和手术生存率尚未完全明确。
共检查了483例枕颈融合术和737例寰枢椎融合术患者。从2008年到2016年,枕颈融合术的发生率上升了55.9%,而寰枢椎融合术上升了21.6%。寰枢椎融合术因创伤导致的比例更高(69.9%对50.5%),而枕颈融合术因退行性疾病导致的比例更高(41.6%对29.4%)(P = 0.0161)。40.9%的枕颈融合术患者出现30天总并发症,而寰枢椎融合术患者为26.3%(调整后比值比 = 2.06,P < 0.0001)。手术部位感染风险增加(调整后比值比 = 2.59,P = 0.0075)。Kaplan Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险分析显示,枕颈融合术后翻修风险更高(对数秩检验:P < 0.0001,调整后风险比 = 2.66,95%置信区间1.73 - 4.10,P < 0.0001)。
枕颈融合术和寰枢椎融合术的发生率在上升,而并发症和翻修手术率仍然很高,即使在控制患者特征和手术指征后,枕颈融合术的发生率仍更高。如果可以安全地进行寰枢椎融合术并为治疗相同病变提供足够的稳定性,脊柱外科医生在考虑枕颈节段融合时应谨慎。