Mu Yi-Man, Huang Xiao-Dan, Zhu Sui, Hu Zheng-Fang, So Kwok-Fai, Ren Chao-Ran, Tao Qian
Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Basic Medicine; Division of Medical Psychology and Behavior Science, School of Basic Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Ministry of Education CNS Regeneration Collaborative Joint Laboratory, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Neural Regen Res. 2022 Sep;17(9):1929-1936. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.335141.
Light plays an essential role in psychobiological and psychophysiological processes, such as alertness. The alerting effect is influenced by light characteristics and the timing of interventions. This meta-analysis is the first to systematically review the effect of light intervention on alertness and to discuss the optimal protocol for light intervention. In this meta-analysis, registered at PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42020181485), we conducted a systematic search of the Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases for studies published in English prior to August 2021. The outcomes included both subjective and objective alertness. Subgroup analyses considered a variety of factors, such as wavelength, correlated color temperature (CCT), light illuminance, and timing of interventions (daytime, night-time, or all day). Twenty-seven crossover studies and two parallel-group studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 1210 healthy participants (636 (52%) male, mean age 25.62 years). The results revealed that light intervention had a positive effect on both subjective alertness (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.49 to -0.06, P = 0.01) and objective alertness in healthy subjects (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.01, P = 0.04). The subgroup analysis revealed that cold light was better than warm light in improving subjective alertness (SMD = -0.37, 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.10, P = 0.007, I = 26%) and objective alertness (SMD = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.07, P = 0.02, I = 0). Both daytime (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.07, P = 0.005, I = 74%) and night-time (SMD = -0.32, 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.02, P = 0.04, I = 0) light exposure improved subjective alertness. The results of this meta-analysis and systematic review indicate that light exposure is associated with significant improvement in subjective and objective alertness. In addition, light exposure with a higher CCT was more effective in improving alertness than light exposure with a lower CCT. Our results also suggest that both daytime and night-time light exposure can improve subjective alertness.
光线在心理生物学和心理生理学过程(如警觉性)中起着至关重要的作用。警觉效应受光线特性和干预时机的影响。本荟萃分析首次系统回顾了光线干预对警觉性的影响,并探讨了光线干预的最佳方案。在这项在PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42020181485)注册的荟萃分析中,我们对科学网、PubMed和PsycINFO数据库进行了系统检索,以查找2021年8月之前发表的英文研究。结果包括主观和客观警觉性。亚组分析考虑了多种因素,如波长、相关色温(CCT)、光照度和干预时机(白天、夜间或全天)。本荟萃分析纳入了27项交叉研究和2项平行组研究,共有1210名健康参与者(636名(52%)男性,平均年龄25.62岁)。结果显示,光线干预对健康受试者的主观警觉性(标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.28,95%置信区间(CI):-0.49至-0.06,P=0.01)和客观警觉性均有积极影响(SMD=-0.34,95%CI:-0.68至-0.01,P=0.04)。亚组分析显示,冷光在改善主观警觉性(SMD=-0.37,95%CI:-0.65至-0.10,P=0.007,I²=26%)和客观警觉性(SMD=-0.36,95%CI:-0.66至-0.07,P=0.02,I²=0)方面优于暖光。白天(SMD=-0.22,95%CI:-0.37至-0.07,P=0.005,I²=74%)和夜间(SMD=-0.32,95%CI:-0.61至-0.02,P=0.04,I²=0)的光照暴露均能改善主观警觉性。这项荟萃分析和系统评价的结果表明,光照暴露与主观和客观警觉性的显著改善相关。此外,表示,较高CCT的光照暴露在改善警觉性方面比较低CCT的光照暴露更有效。我们的结果还表明,白天和夜间的光照暴露均可改善主观警觉性。