Seppänen Marjo, Lankila Tiina, Auvinen Juha, Miettunen Jouko, Korpelainen Raija, Timonen Markku
Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland; Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Finland; and Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Oulu Deaconess Institute Foundation, Finland.
Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland; and Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Oulu Deaconess Institute Foundation, Finland.
BJPsych Open. 2022 Feb 11;8(2):e46. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.13.
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and BDI-II (revised version) are some of the most widely used and comparable self-report scales for assessing the presence and severity of depressive symptoms in many countries. However, although the relative mean score of each symptom in different countries may vary, the cultural differences of BDI-II symptoms for each item have not been previously studied.
To examine the overall picture of the magnitude of the symptoms in the Finnish population, and compare the relative mean score of each symptom between all published population-based samples from different countries fulfilling the search criteria.
We conducted a search for population-based studies reporting BDI-II item, using Scopus, PsycINFO and PubMed, and five population-based samples were identified. Relative average scores for each item of the scale were calculated for the Finnish population and five populations from other countries. Meta-regression methods were used to test the differences in the relative score of each symptom between each country separately, and results were then visually compared with spider charts.
We found significant differences in several BDI-II item scores between countries: lower indecisiveness, higher changes in sleep pattern and higher irritability in Finland; higher loss of pleasure in Norway; higher loss of interest in the Dominic Republic; higher self-criticalness and feelings of punishment in Mexico; and higher sadness in Japan.
Based on the study fundings and including all currently published population-based samples with BDI-II scores, cultural differences in depressive symptoms should be considered when interpreting BDI-II item scores.
贝克抑郁量表(BDI)及其修订版BDI-II是许多国家评估抑郁症状的存在及严重程度时使用最广泛且具有可比性的自评量表。然而,尽管不同国家各症状的相对平均分可能有所不同,但此前尚未对BDI-II各项目症状的文化差异进行研究。
考察芬兰人群中症状严重程度的整体情况,并比较符合检索标准的不同国家所有已发表的基于人群样本中各症状的相对平均分。
我们使用Scopus、PsycINFO和PubMed对报告BDI-II项目的基于人群的研究进行检索,共识别出五个基于人群的样本。计算了芬兰人群以及其他五个国家人群中该量表各项目的相对平均分。采用元回归方法分别检验各国之间各症状相对得分的差异,然后用蛛网图对结果进行直观比较。
我们发现各国在BDI-II的几个项目得分上存在显著差异:芬兰的犹豫不决得分较低、睡眠模式变化得分较高、易怒得分较高;挪威的愉悦感丧失得分较高;多米尼加共和国的兴趣丧失得分较高;墨西哥的自我批评和受惩罚感得分较高;日本的悲伤得分较高。
基于研究结果并纳入所有目前已发表的有BDI-II得分的基于人群样本,在解释BDI-II项目得分时应考虑抑郁症状的文化差异。