Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2022 Winter;28(1):13-20. doi: 10.46292/sci21-00033. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
Intensive rehabilitation of adolescents occurs in general and pediatric inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), but differences in admission and outcomes by facility type have not been thoroughly investigated, particularly among persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).
To investigate factors related to admission to pediatric or adult IRFs among adolescents and compare the rehabilitation outcomes between facility types.
Using a single-center retrospective cohort study design, demographic information, medical data, and rehabilitation outcomes were obtained by chart review of patients aged 15 to 18 years who received a rehabilitation medicine consultation at an urban level 1 trauma center between 2017 and 2019 ( = 96). Analysis was performed using R statistical software.
SCI was the second most common diagnosis (21% of patients) and accounted for 36% of inpatient rehabilitation admissions. SCI patients were more likely to undergo rehabilitation at the level 1 trauma versus pediatric facility (relative risk [RR] = 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-5.44) compared to traumatic brain injury patients. Admission to trauma versus pediatric IRF was also associated with Black compared to White race (RR = 2.5; CI = 1.12-5.56), violence compared to other etiologies of injury (RR = 2.0; CI = 1.10-3.77), and Medicaid compared to private insurance (RR = 2.15; CI = 1.01-4.59). Admission to pediatric IRF was associated with longer length of stay than admission to adult IRF when adjusted for diagnosis (30.86 ± 21.82 vs. 24.33 ± 18.17 days; = .046), but Functional Independence Measures did not differ.
Adolescents with SCI and those experiencing systemic disadvantages, including racism and poverty, were more likely to be admitted to trauma compared to pediatric IRF.
青少年密集康复在综合和儿科住院康复机构(IRF)中进行,但设施类型对入院和结果的影响尚未得到充分研究,特别是在脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中。
调查青少年入住儿科或成人 IRF 的相关因素,并比较两种设施类型的康复结果。
使用单中心回顾性队列研究设计,通过对 2017 年至 2019 年在城市一级创伤中心接受康复医学咨询的 15 至 18 岁患者的图表审查,获得人口统计学信息、医疗数据和康复结果(n = 96)。使用 R 统计软件进行分析。
SCI 是第二常见的诊断(21%的患者),占住院康复入院人数的 36%。与创伤性脑损伤患者相比,SCI 患者更有可能在一级创伤而非儿科设施接受康复治疗(相对风险 [RR] = 2.43;95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.08-5.44)。与白人相比,黑人种族(RR = 2.5;CI = 1.12-5.56)、与其他病因相比暴力(RR = 2.0;CI = 1.10-3.77)、与私人保险相比医疗补助(RR = 2.15;CI = 1.01-4.59)与在儿科 IRF 入院相关。在调整诊断后,与成人 IRF 入院相比,儿科 IRF 入院的住院时间更长(30.86 ± 21.82 与 24.33 ± 18.17 天;P =.046),但功能独立性测量结果没有差异。
与儿科 IRF 相比,患有 SCI 的青少年和经历种族主义和贫困等系统性劣势的青少年更有可能被送入创伤性 IRF。