Suppr超能文献

通过自动图像分析测量局部主动脉瘤壁扩张。

Local aortic aneurysm wall expansion measured with automated image analysis.

作者信息

Stoecker Jordan B, Eddinger Kevin C, Pouch Alison M, Vrudhula Amey, Jackson Benjamin M

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Division of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

JVS Vasc Sci. 2021 Dec 8;3:48-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2021.11.004. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment of regional aortic wall deformation (RAWD) might better predict for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture than the maximal aortic diameter or growth rate. Using sequential computed tomography angiograms (CTAs), we developed a streamlined, semiautomated method of computing RAWD using deformable image registration (dirRAWD).

METHODS

Paired sequential CTAs performed 1 to 2 years apart of 15 patients with AAAs of various shapes and sizes were selected. Using each patient's initial CTA, the luminal and aortic wall surfaces were segmented both manually and semiautomatically. Next, the same patient's follow-up CTA was aligned with the first using automated rigid image registration. Deformable image registration was then used to calculate the local aneurysm wall expansion between the sequential scans (dirRAWD). To measure technique accuracy, the deformable registration results were compared with the local displacement of anatomic landmarks (fiducial markers), such as the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery and/or aortic wall calcifications. Additionally, for each patient, the maximal RAWD was manually measured for each aneurysm and was compared with the dirRAWD at the same location.

RESULTS

The technique was successful in all patients. The mean landmark displacement error was 0.59 ± 0.93 mm with no difference between true landmark displacement and deformable registration landmark displacement by Wilcoxon rank sum test ( = .39). The absolute difference between the manually measured maximal RAWD and dirRAWD was 0.27 ± 0.23 mm, with a relative difference of 7.9% and no difference using the Wilcoxon rank sum test ( = .69). No differences were found in the maximal dirRAWD when derived using a purely manual AAA segmentation compared with using semiautomated AAA segmentation ( = .55).

CONCLUSIONS

We found accurate and automated RAWD measurements were feasible with clinically insignificant errors. Using semiautomated AAA segmentations for deformable image registration methods did not alter maximal dirRAWD accuracy compared with using manual AAA segmentations. Future work will compare dirRAWD with finite element analysis-derived regional wall stress and determine whether dirRAWD might serve as an independent predictor of rupture risk.

摘要

背景

与最大主动脉直径或生长速率相比,评估局部主动脉壁变形(RAWD)可能能更好地预测腹主动脉瘤(AAA)破裂。利用序列计算机断层血管造影(CTA),我们开发了一种使用可变形图像配准计算RAWD的简化、半自动方法(dirRAWD)。

方法

选取15例不同形状和大小的AAA患者间隔1至2年进行的配对序列CTA。利用每位患者的初始CTA,手动和半自动分割管腔及主动脉壁表面。接下来,使用自动刚性图像配准将同一位患者的随访CTA与首次CTA对齐。然后使用可变形图像配准计算序列扫描之间的局部动脉瘤壁扩张(dirRAWD)。为测量技术准确性,将可变形配准结果与解剖标志(基准标记)的局部位移进行比较,如肠系膜下动脉起点和/或主动脉壁钙化。此外,对每位患者,手动测量每个动脉瘤的最大RAWD,并与同一位置的dirRAWD进行比较。

结果

该技术在所有患者中均成功。平均标志位移误差为0.59±0.93mm,经Wilcoxon秩和检验,真实标志位移与可变形配准标志位移之间无差异(P = 0.39)。手动测量的最大RAWD与dirRAWD之间的绝对差异为0.27±0.23mm,相对差异为7.9%,经Wilcoxon秩和检验无差异(P = 0.69)。与使用半自动AAA分割相比,使用纯手动AAA分割得出的最大dirRAWD无差异(P = 0.55)。

结论

我们发现准确且自动的RAWD测量是可行的,误差在临床上无显著意义。与使用手动AAA分割相比,使用半自动AAA分割进行可变形图像配准方法不会改变最大dirRAWD的准确性。未来的工作将比较dirRAWD与有限元分析得出的局部壁应力,并确定dirRAWD是否可作为破裂风险的独立预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e98e/8802047/0bd1b5d2b6fd/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验