Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, 301 Middle Yanchang Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Jun;34(6):1429-1438. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02087-y. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
There is little evidence on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectories after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
We aim to identify the LVEF trajectories after STEMI and explore their predictors and association with prognosis.
This is a retrospective, observational study of STEMI patients. The LVEF trajectories were identified by the latent class trajectory model in patients with baseline LVEF < 50%. We used logistic regression analysis to investigate the predictors for LVEF trajectories. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the impact of LVEF trajectories on prognosis. The primary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization.
572 of 1179 patients presented with baseline normal LVEF (≥ 50%) and 607 with baseline reduced LVEF (< 50%). Two distinct LVEF trajectories were identified in patients with baseline reduced LVEF: recovered LVEF group and persistently reduced LVEF group. Higher baseline LVEF, lower peak troponin T, non-anterior MI, and lower heart rates were all found to be independently associated with LVEF recovery. After multivariate adjustments, patients with persistently reduced LVEF experienced an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 7.49, 95% CI 1.94-28.87, P = 0.003) and HF rehospitalization (HR 3.54, 95% CI 1.56-8.06 P = 0.003) compared to patients with baseline normal LVEF. Patients with recovered LVEF, on the other hand, showed no significant risk of cardiovascular mortality and HF rehospitalization.
Our study indicated two distinct LVEF trajectories after STEMI and that the persistently reduced LVEF trajectory was related to poor prognosis. In addition, several baseline characteristics can predict LVEF recovery.
ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后左心室射血分数(LVEF)轨迹的证据很少。
我们旨在确定 STEMI 后的 LVEF 轨迹,并探讨其预测因素及其与预后的关系。
这是一项回顾性、观察性研究,纳入了 STEMI 患者。通过基线 LVEF<50%的患者的潜在类别轨迹模型确定 LVEF 轨迹。我们使用逻辑回归分析探讨 LVEF 轨迹的预测因素。使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估 LVEF 轨迹对预后的影响。主要结局是心血管死亡率和心力衰竭(HF)再住院。
1179 例患者中,572 例基线 LVEF 正常(≥50%),607 例基线 LVEF 降低(<50%)。基线 LVEF 降低的患者存在两种不同的 LVEF 轨迹:LVEF 恢复组和持续降低的 LVEF 组。较高的基线 LVEF、较低的峰值肌钙蛋白 T、非前壁心肌梗死和较低的心率均与 LVEF 恢复独立相关。经过多变量调整后,与基线 LVEF 正常的患者相比,持续降低 LVEF 的患者发生心血管死亡的风险增加(HR 7.49,95%CI 1.94-28.87,P=0.003)和 HF 再住院(HR 3.54,95%CI 1.56-8.06,P=0.003)。相反,LVEF 恢复的患者心血管死亡和 HF 再住院的风险没有显著增加。
本研究表明 STEMI 后存在两种不同的 LVEF 轨迹,持续降低的 LVEF 轨迹与不良预后相关。此外,一些基线特征可以预测 LVEF 的恢复。