Ndrepepa Gjin, Cassese Salvatore, Joner Michael, Sager Hendrik B, Kufner Sebastian, Xhepa Erion, Laugwitz Karl-Ludwig, Schunkert Heribert, Kastrati Adnan
Department of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, TUM Universitätsklinikum, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Dec 16. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02588-y.
Whether there are differences in the left ventricular ejection fraction change (ΔLVEF) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its association with long-term prognosis according to coronary artery disease (CAD) presentations is unknown. We assessed ΔLVEF after PCI and its association with 5-year mortality in various CAD presentations.
This study included 8181 patients with paired (before and 6-8 months after PCI) angiographic LVEF measurements: 4582 patients with chronic coronary disease (CCD), 1972 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and 1627 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). ΔLVEF (LVEF at 6-8 months minus baseline LVEF) was classified as follows: decline (ΔLVEF < 0), moderate improvement (ΔLVEF > 0 to < 10%) and large improvement (ΔLVEF ≥ 10%). The primary endpoint was 5 year mortality.
In patients with CCD, NSTE-ACS and STEMI, ΔLVEF (median [25th-75th percentiles]) was 0.0% [- 3.0%; 4.0%], 1.0% [- 2.0%; 5.0%] and 3.0% [- 2.0%; 10.0%], respectively (P < 0.001). In patients with a decline, moderate improvement and large improvement of LVEF, 5-year mortality was 10.0%, 10.4% and 12.3% in patients with CCD, 10.8%, 10.7% and 18.1% in patients with NSTE-ACS and 10.6%, 8.2% and 5.2% in patients with STEMI. After adjustment, ΔLVEF was associated with 5-year mortality in patients with CCD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [0.83-0.97]) and STEMI (adjusted HR = 0.85 [0.75-0.95]) but not in patients with NSTE-ACS (adjusted HR = 0.97 [0.85-1.10]), with all 3 risk estimates calculated for 5% increment in the ΔLVEF.
The type of CAD presentation appears to impact both LVEF change after PCI and its association with 5-year mortality.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后左心室射血分数变化(ΔLVEF)是否存在差异,以及根据冠状动脉疾病(CAD)表现其与长期预后的关系尚不清楚。我们评估了PCI后的ΔLVEF及其与各种CAD表现患者5年死亡率的关系。
本研究纳入了8181例有配对(PCI前和PCI后6 - 8个月)血管造影LVEF测量值的患者:4582例慢性冠状动脉疾病(CCD)患者、1972例非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE - ACS)患者和1627例ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者。ΔLVEF(6 - 8个月时的LVEF减去基线LVEF)分类如下:下降(ΔLVEF<0)、中度改善(ΔLVEF>0至<10%)和显著改善(ΔLVEF≥10%)。主要终点为5年死亡率。
在CCD、NSTE - ACS和STEMI患者中,ΔLVEF(中位数[第25 - 75百分位数])分别为0.0%[-3.0%;4.0%]、1.0%[-2.0%;5.0%]和3.0%[-2.0%;10.0%](P<0.001)。在LVEF下降、中度改善和显著改善的患者中,CCD患者的5年死亡率分别为10.0%、10.4%和12.3%,NSTE - ACS患者分别为10.8%、10.7%和18.1%,STEMI患者分别为10.6%、8.2%和5.2%。调整后,ΔLVEF与CCD患者(调整后风险比[HR]=0.90,95%置信区间[0.83 - 0.97])和STEMI患者(调整后HR = 0.85[0.75 - 0.95])的5年死亡率相关,但与NSTE - ACS患者无关(调整后HR = 0.97[0.85 - 1.10]),所有3个风险估计值均针对ΔLVEF增加5%进行计算。
CAD的表现类型似乎既影响PCI后LVEF的变化,也影响其与5年死亡率的关系。