Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Prescriptive Appropriateness, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, Milan 20156, Italy.
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Prescriptive Appropriateness, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, Milan 20156, Italy.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 May-Jun;100:104649. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104649. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
Comorbidity indexes were designed in order to measure how the disease burden of a patient is related to different clinical outcomes such as mortality, especially in older and intensively treated people. Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI) is the most widely used rating system, based on diagnoses, but when this information is not available therapy-based comorbidity indices (TBCI) are an alternative: among them, Drug Derived Complexity Index (DDCI), Medicines Comorbidity Index (MCI), and Chronic Disease Score (CDS) are available.
This study assessed the predictive power for 1-year mortality of these comorbidity indices and polypharmacy.
Survival analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis were conducted on three Italian cohorts: 2,389 nursing home residents (Korian), 4,765 and 633 older adults admitted acutely to geriatric or internal medicine wards (REPOSI and ELICADHE).
Cox's regression indicated that the highest levels of the CCI are associated with an increment of 1-year mortality risk as compared to null score for all the three samples. DDCI and excessive polypharmacy gave similar results but MCI and CDS were not always statistically significant. The predictive power with the ROC curve of each comorbidity index was poor and similar in all settings.
On the whole, comorbidity indices did not perform well in our three settings, although the highest level of each index was associated with higher mortality.
共病指数是为了衡量患者的疾病负担与不同临床结局(如死亡率)之间的关系而设计的,尤其是在老年人和接受强化治疗的人群中。Charlson 共病指数(CCI)是最广泛使用的评分系统,基于诊断,但当这些信息不可用时,基于治疗的共病指数(TBCI)是一种替代方法:其中,药物衍生复杂度指数(DDCI)、药物共病指数(MCI)和慢性病评分(CDS)可用。
本研究评估了这些共病指数和多种药物治疗对 1 年死亡率的预测能力。
对三个意大利队列进行生存分析和接收器操作特征(ROC)分析:2389 名疗养院居民(Korian)、4765 名和 633 名急性入住老年医学或内科病房的老年人(REPOSI 和 ELICADHE)。
Cox 回归表明,与所有三个样本的零评分相比,CCI 的最高水平与 1 年死亡率风险的增加相关。DDCI 和过度多种药物治疗产生了类似的结果,但 MCI 和 CDS 并不总是具有统计学意义。每个共病指数的 ROC 曲线的预测能力较差,在所有环境中相似。
总体而言,共病指数在我们的三个环境中表现不佳,尽管每个指数的最高水平与更高的死亡率相关。