文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

风险、预期和信任对临床医生使用人工智能系统(血液利用计算器)的意愿的影响。

Effect of risk, expectancy, and trust on clinicians' intent to use an artificial intelligence system -- Blood Utilization Calculator.

机构信息

School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, NJ, 07030, Hoboken, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2022 May;101:103708. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103708. Epub 2022 Feb 8.


DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103708
PMID:35149301
Abstract

A gap exists between the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare and the extent to which clinicians are willing to adopt these systems. Our study addressed this gap by leveraging 'expectancy-value theory' and 'modified extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology' to understand why clinicians may be willing or unwilling to adopt AI systems. The study looked at the 'expectancy,' 'trust,' and 'perceptions' of clinicians related to their intention of using an AI-based decision support system known as the Blood Utilization Calculator (BUC). The study used purposive sampling to recruit BUC users and administered a validated online survey from a large hospital system in the Midwest in 2021. The findings captured the significant effect of 'perceived risk' (negatively) and 'expectancy' (positively) on clinicians' 'trust' in BUC. 'Trust' was also found to mediate the relationship of 'perceived risk' and 'expectancy' with the 'intent to use BUC.' The study's findings established pathways for future research and have implications on factors influencing BUC use.

摘要

人工智能 (AI) 技术在医疗保健中的应用能力与临床医生愿意采用这些系统的程度之间存在差距。我们的研究利用“期望价值理论”和“修正的扩展技术接受和使用统一理论”来理解为什么临床医生可能愿意或不愿意采用 AI 系统。该研究着眼于与他们使用基于人工智能的决策支持系统(称为血液利用计算器 (BUC))的意图相关的临床医生的“期望”、“信任”和“感知”。该研究采用目的性抽样招募了 BUC 用户,并于 2021 年在中西部的一家大型医院系统中进行了一项经过验证的在线调查。研究结果捕捉到了“感知风险”(负向)和“期望”(正向)对临床医生对 BUC 的“信任”的显著影响。还发现“信任”中介了“感知风险”和“期望”与“使用 BUC 的意图”之间的关系。该研究的结果为未来的研究建立了途径,并对影响 BUC 使用的因素具有启示意义。

相似文献

[1]
Effect of risk, expectancy, and trust on clinicians' intent to use an artificial intelligence system -- Blood Utilization Calculator.

Appl Ergon. 2022-5

[2]
Factors influencing clinicians' willingness to use an AI-based clinical decision support system.

Front Digit Health. 2022-8-16

[3]
Clinicians' Perceptions of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Blood Utilization Calculator: Qualitative Exploratory Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2022-10-31

[4]
Theory of trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence technology (TrAAIT): An instrument to assess clinician trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence.

J Biomed Inform. 2023-12

[5]
Predictors of Health Care Practitioners' Intention to Use AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Meta-Analysis Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-8-5

[6]
Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-6-19

[7]
Clinicians' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Focus on Workload, Risk, Trust, Clinical Decision Making, and Clinical Integration.

Healthcare (Basel). 2023-8-16

[8]
Promoting Healthcare Workers' Adoption Intention of Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment: The Chain Mediation of Social Influence and Human-Computer Trust.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-10-15

[9]
Exploring perceptions of healthcare technologies enabled by artificial intelligence: an online, scenario-based survey.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021-7-20

[10]
Determinants of Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis Support System Among Prospective Physicians.

Front Public Health. 2021

引用本文的文献

[1]
Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.

BMJ Open. 2025-4-15

[2]
Unlocking engagement: exploring the drivers of elderly participation in digital backfeeding through community education.

Front Psychol. 2025-2-6

[3]
Health Care Professionals' Experience of Using AI: Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-10-30

[4]
Quality of interaction between clinicians and artificial intelligence systems. A systematic review.

Future Healthc J. 2024-8-17

[5]
Risk Perception, Acceptance, and Trust of Using AI in Gastroenterology Practice in the Asia-Pacific Region: Web-Based Survey Study.

JMIR AI. 2024-3-7

[6]
Exploring the antecedents of AI adoption for effective HRM practices in the Indian pharmaceutical sector.

Front Pharmacol. 2023-11-14

[7]
Theory of trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence technology (TrAAIT): An instrument to assess clinician trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence.

J Biomed Inform. 2023-12

[8]
Integrating intention-based systems in human-robot interaction: a scoping review of sensors, algorithms, and trust.

Front Robot AI. 2023-10-9

[9]
Radiology Residents' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-10-19

[10]
Early experiences of integrating an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic decision support system into radiology settings: a qualitative study.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023-12-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索