Choudhury Avishek
Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 16;4:920662. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.920662. eCollection 2022.
Given the opportunities created by artificial intelligence (AI) based decision support systems in healthcare, the vital question is whether clinicians are willing to use this technology as an integral part of clinical workflow.
This study leverages validated questions to formulate an online survey and consequently explore cognitive human factors influencing clinicians' intention to use an AI-based Blood Utilization Calculator (BUC), an AI system embedded in the electronic health record that delivers data-driven personalized recommendations for the number of packed red blood cells to transfuse for a given patient.
A purposeful sampling strategy was used to exclusively include BUC users who are clinicians in a university hospital in Wisconsin. We recruited 119 BUC users who completed the entire survey. We leveraged structural equation modeling to capture the direct and indirect effects of "AI Perception" and "Expectancy" on clinicians' Intention to use the technology when mediated by "Perceived Risk".
The findings indicate a significant negative relationship concerning the direct impact of AI's perception on BUC Risk (ß = -0.23, < 0.001). Similarly, Expectancy had a significant negative effect on Risk (ß = -0.49, < 0.001). We also noted a significant negative impact of Risk on the Intent to use BUC (ß = -0.34, < 0.001). Regarding the indirect effect of Expectancy on the Intent to Use BUC, the findings show a significant positive impact mediated by Risk (ß = 0.17, = 0.004). The study noted a significant positive and indirect effect of AI Perception on the Intent to Use BUC when mediated by risk (ß = 0.08, = 0.027). Overall, this study demonstrated the influences of expectancy, perceived risk, and perception of AI on clinicians' intent to use BUC (an AI system). AI developers need to emphasize the benefits of AI technology, ensure ease of use (effort expectancy), clarify the system's potential (performance expectancy), and minimize the risk perceptions by improving the overall design.
Identifying the factors that determine clinicians' intent to use AI-based decision support systems can help improve technology adoption and use in the healthcare domain. Enhanced and safe adoption of AI can uplift the overall care process and help standardize clinical decisions and procedures. An improved AI adoption in healthcare will help clinicians share their everyday clinical workload and make critical decisions.
鉴于基于人工智能(AI)的决策支持系统在医疗保健领域创造的机遇,关键问题在于临床医生是否愿意将这项技术作为临床工作流程的一个组成部分来使用。
本研究利用经过验证的问题制定了一项在线调查,从而探索影响临床医生使用基于人工智能的血液利用计算器(BUC)意愿的认知人为因素。BUC是一种嵌入电子健康记录的人工智能系统,它能为特定患者输注的红细胞数量提供数据驱动的个性化建议。
采用有目的抽样策略,专门纳入威斯康星州一家大学医院中使用BUC的临床医生用户。我们招募了119名完成了整个调查的BUC用户。我们利用结构方程模型来捕捉“对人工智能的认知”和“预期”在通过“感知风险”进行中介时,对临床医生使用该技术意愿的直接和间接影响。
研究结果表明,对人工智能的认知对BUC风险的直接影响存在显著负相关关系(β = -0.23,< 0.001)。同样,预期对风险有显著负向影响(β = -0.49,< 0.001)。我们还注意到风险对使用BUC的意愿有显著负向影响(β = -0.34,< 0.001)。关于预期对使用BUC意愿的间接影响,研究结果显示通过风险中介存在显著正向影响(β = 0.17,= 0.004)。该研究指出,当通过风险进行中介时,对人工智能的认知对使用BUC的意愿有显著正向间接影响(β = 0.08,= 0.027)。总体而言,本研究证明了预期、感知风险和对人工智能的认知对临床医生使用BUC(一种人工智能系统)意愿的影响。人工智能开发者需要强调人工智能技术的益处,确保易用性(努力预期),阐明系统的潜力(性能预期),并通过改进整体设计来最小化风险认知。
确定决定临床医生使用基于人工智能的决策支持系统意愿的因素有助于提高医疗保健领域对技术的采用和使用。加强和安全地采用人工智能可以提升整体护理过程,并有助于规范临床决策和程序。在医疗保健领域更好地采用人工智能将有助于临床医生分担日常临床工作量并做出关键决策。