文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

预测医疗保健从业者使用人工智能临床决策支持系统的意图:基于统一技术接受和使用理论的元分析。

Predictors of Health Care Practitioners' Intention to Use AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Meta-Analysis Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.

机构信息

Human-AI-Interaction Group, Center for Leadership and People Management, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Technical University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 5;26:e57224. doi: 10.2196/57224.


DOI:10.2196/57224
PMID:39102675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11333871/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSSs) offer potential for improving health care outcomes, but their adoption among health care practitioners remains limited. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis identified predictors influencing health care practitioners' intention to use AI-CDSSs based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Additional predictors were examined based on existing empirical evidence. METHODS: The literature search using electronic databases, forward searches, conference programs, and personal correspondence yielded 7731 results, of which 17 (0.22%) studies met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis, relative weight analyses, and meta-analytic moderation and mediation analyses were used to examine the relationships between relevant predictor variables and the intention to use AI-CDSSs. RESULTS: The meta-analysis results supported the application of the UTAUT to the context of the intention to use AI-CDSSs. The results showed that performance expectancy (r=0.66), effort expectancy (r=0.55), social influence (r=0.66), and facilitating conditions (r=0.66) were positively associated with the intention to use AI-CDSSs, in line with the predictions of the UTAUT. The meta-analysis further identified positive attitude (r=0.63), trust (r=0.73), anxiety (r=-0.41), perceived risk (r=-0.21), and innovativeness (r=0.54) as additional relevant predictors. Trust emerged as the most influential predictor overall. The results of the moderation analyses show that the relationship between social influence and use intention becomes weaker with increasing age. In addition, the relationship between effort expectancy and use intention was stronger for diagnostic AI-CDSSs than for devices that combined diagnostic and treatment recommendations. Finally, the relationship between facilitating conditions and use intention was mediated through performance and effort expectancy. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis contributes to the understanding of the predictors of intention to use AI-CDSSs based on an extended UTAUT model. More research is needed to substantiate the identified relationships and explain the observed variations in effect sizes by identifying relevant moderating factors. The research findings bear important implications for the design and implementation of training programs for health care practitioners to ease the adoption of AI-CDSSs into their practice.

摘要

背景:人工智能支持的临床决策支持系统(AI-CDSS)有潜力改善医疗保健结果,但它们在医疗保健从业者中的采用仍然有限。

目的:本荟萃分析根据统一接受和使用技术理论(UTAUT)确定影响医疗保健从业者使用 AI-CDSS 意愿的预测因素。根据现有实证证据,还检查了其他预测因素。

方法:使用电子数据库、前向搜索、会议计划和个人通信进行文献检索,产生了 7731 个结果,其中 17 项(0.22%)研究符合纳入标准。使用随机效应荟萃分析、相对权重分析以及荟萃分析调节和中介分析来检验相关预测变量与使用 AI-CDSS 意愿之间的关系。

结果:荟萃分析结果支持将 UTAUT 应用于使用 AI-CDSS 的意图背景。结果表明,绩效期望(r=0.66)、努力期望(r=0.55)、社会影响(r=0.66)和便利条件(r=0.66)与使用 AI-CDSS 的意愿呈正相关,与 UTAUT 的预测一致。荟萃分析还确定了积极的态度(r=0.63)、信任(r=0.73)、焦虑(r=-0.41)、感知风险(r=-0.21)和创新性(r=0.54)作为其他相关预测因素。信任是整体上最具影响力的预测因素。调节分析的结果表明,随着年龄的增长,社会影响与使用意愿之间的关系变得较弱。此外,对于诊断 AI-CDSS,努力期望与使用意愿之间的关系强于将诊断和治疗建议相结合的设备。最后,便利条件与使用意愿之间的关系通过绩效和努力期望得到中介。

结论:本荟萃分析有助于根据扩展的 UTAUT 模型理解使用 AI-CDSS 的意愿预测因素。需要更多的研究来证实所确定的关系,并通过确定相关调节因素来解释观察到的效应大小变化。研究结果对设计和实施医疗保健从业者培训计划具有重要意义,以减轻 AI-CDSS 在实践中的采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8911/11333871/84294f892a91/jmir_v26i1e57224_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8911/11333871/29155828b75b/jmir_v26i1e57224_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8911/11333871/84294f892a91/jmir_v26i1e57224_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8911/11333871/29155828b75b/jmir_v26i1e57224_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8911/11333871/84294f892a91/jmir_v26i1e57224_fig2.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Predictors of Health Care Practitioners' Intention to Use AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Meta-Analysis Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-8-5

[2]
The Willingness of Doctors to Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems at Different Hospitals in China: Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Survey Data.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-1-7

[3]
Human Factors and Technological Characteristics Influencing the Interaction of Medical Professionals With Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Literature Review.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2022-3-24

[4]
Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.

BMJ Open. 2025-4-15

[5]
Attitudes Toward the Adoption of 2 Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Mental Health Tools Among Prospective Psychotherapists: Cross-sectional Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2023-7-12

[6]
Understanding the predictors of health professionals' intention to use electronic health record system: extend and apply UTAUT3 model.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-8-3

[7]
The Drivers of Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Care Pathways Among Medical Professionals: Web-Based Survey Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2022-6-21

[8]
Utilization of, Perceptions on, and Intention to Use AI Chatbots Among Medical Students in China: National Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR Med Educ. 2024-10-28

[9]
Nursing students' intent to use AI-based healthcare technology: Path analysis using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.

Nurse Educ Today. 2022-12

[10]
Investigating Clinicians' Intentions and Influencing Factors for Using an Intelligence-Enabled Diagnostic Clinical Decision Support System in Health Care Systems: Cross-Sectional Survey.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-4-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
AI in Fracture Detection: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Physician Acceptance Using the UTAUT Model.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-8-21

[2]
Structural equation modeling for influencing factors on behavioral intention to adopt medical AI among Chinese nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

BMC Nurs. 2025-8-18

[3]
Usability and adoption in a randomized trial of GutGPT a GenAI tool for gastrointestinal bleeding.

NPJ Digit Med. 2025-8-18

[4]
Attitudes, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI in Health Care Among Medical Staff: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-8-8

[5]
Investigating psychotherapists' attitudes towards artificial intelligence in psychotherapy.

BMC Psychol. 2025-7-1

[6]
Healthcare providers' perceptions of artificial intelligence in diabetes care: A cross-sectional study in China.

Int J Nurs Sci. 2025-4-28

[7]
Application of AI Chatbot in Responding to Asynchronous Text-Based Messages From Patients With Cancer: Comparative Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-5-21

[8]
Factors Influencing Educators' Perspectives on Accepting Extended Reality in Health Care Education: Qualitative Study.

JMIR Med Educ. 2025-5-1

[9]
Mental health practitioners' perceptions and adoption intentions of AI-enabled technologies: an international mixed-methods study.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-4-16

[10]
An AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis (KINBIOTICS): Use Case Analysis.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2025-3-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Insights on the Current State and Future Outlook of AI in Health Care: Expert Interview Study.

JMIR AI. 2023-10-31

[2]
Justice at the Forefront: Cultivating felt accountability towards Artificial Intelligence among healthcare professionals.

Soc Sci Med. 2024-4

[3]
Initial User-Centred Design of an AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Primary Care.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024-1-25

[4]
Trust and acceptability of data-driven clinical recommendations in everyday practice: A scoping review.

Int J Med Inform. 2024-3

[5]
Usability and performance expectancy govern spine surgeons' use of a clinical decision support system for shared decision-making on the choice of treatment of common lumbar degenerative disorders.

Front Digit Health. 2023-8-15

[6]
Clinicians and AI use: where is the professional guidance?

J Med Ethics. 2024-6-21

[7]
Attitudes Toward the Adoption of 2 Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Mental Health Tools Among Prospective Psychotherapists: Cross-sectional Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2023-7-12

[8]
An integrative review on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare professionals in hospitals.

NPJ Digit Med. 2023-6-10

[9]
Artificial intelligence and clinical decision support: clinicians' perspectives on trust, trustworthiness, and liability.

Med Law Rev. 2023-11-27

[10]
Increasing acceptance of medical AI: The role of medical staff participation in AI development.

Int J Med Inform. 2023-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索