Suppr超能文献

评估人脂肪组织中 RNA 提取方法。

Evaluation of RNA Isolation Methods in Human Adipose Tissue.

机构信息

Clinical Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Lab Med. 2022 Sep 1;53(5):e129-e133. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmab126.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Research has shown that RNA extraction from adipose tissue (AT) is challenging because of high lipid content and low RNA quantity. We compared a traditional RNA extraction with a column-based method in human AT to evaluate RNA quantity and quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human subcutaneous AT (n = 9) was collected through needle biopsy, and RNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform traditional method and the RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit column-based method. The RNA quantity, quality, integrity, and expression of key AT genes were assessed.

RESULTS

We found that the RNA quantity and integrity were reduced by 40% and 15-20%, respectively, using the column-based method compared to the traditional method, but the findings were not statistically significant. The column-based method showed a higher 260/280 ratio (2.0) compared to the traditional method (1.8) (P <.05), suggesting lower amounts of contaminants. The expression of AT genes was comparable between methods.

CONCLUSION

The traditional extraction method provides adequate RNA yield and integrity compared to the column-based method, which is an advantage when AT specimens are small.

摘要

目的

研究表明,由于脂肪组织(AT)中的脂质含量高和 RNA 数量低,因此从脂肪组织中提取 RNA 具有挑战性。我们比较了传统的 RNA 提取方法与基于柱的方法在人类 AT 中的应用,以评估 RNA 的数量和质量。

材料和方法

通过针吸活检收集人体皮下 AT(n = 9),并使用苯酚-氯仿传统方法和 RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit 基于柱的方法提取 RNA。评估 RNA 数量、质量、完整性和关键 AT 基因的表达。

结果

与传统方法相比,基于柱的方法使 RNA 数量和完整性分别降低了 40%和 15-20%,但差异无统计学意义。与传统方法(1.8)相比,基于柱的方法显示出更高的 260/280 比值(2.0)(P<.05),提示污染物含量较低。两种方法检测 AT 基因的表达结果相当。

结论

与基于柱的方法相比,传统的提取方法可提供足够的 RNA 产量和完整性,这在 AT 标本较小的情况下是一个优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验