Suppr超能文献

增强阴性对照选择:从正常乳腺组织中获取高质量RNA的随机抽样和靶向抽样技术的比较分析

Enhancing negative control selection: A comparative analysis of random and targeted sampling techniques for obtaining High-Quality RNA from normal breast tissue.

作者信息

Mehta Komal, Sharma Archana, Mehta Anurag, Tayal Juhi

机构信息

Biorepository, Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, India.

Histopathology, Department of Laboratory Services, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi 110085, India.

出版信息

Biol Methods Protoc. 2024 Nov 5;9(1):bpae083. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae083. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Molecular profiling is a crucial aspect of cancer therapy selection, underscoring the necessity for representative sampling of both tumor and normal tissues. While much attention has been given to representative tumor sampling, there has been a notable lack of exploration into the issue of poor RNA quality in normal breast tissue processing. Normal breast tissue from the same patient is often used as a negative control for most "-omics" experiments. RNA extracted from normal breast tissues frequently contains nucleic acids from surrounding adipocytes, endothelial cells, and immune cells, leading to a low representation of ductal elements and skewed results. Therefore, ensuring a complete representation of breast glandular tissue is imperative. The study aimed to investigate the variations in RNA enrichment between a random sampling technique and a targeted sampling approach when visually selecting normal breast tissue sections as negative controls for "-omics" experiments. Fifteen female breast cancer subjects who underwent Modified Radical Mastectomy were selected for the study. Normal Breast tissue was visually examined, and samples were collected from random fat pockets (random sampling) and fibromuscular grey-white streak areas (targeted sampling). RNA was isolated, followed by spectrophotometric analysis, agarose gel electrophoresis and Agilent Tape station analysis. Histopathological assessments and a gene expression study for housekeeping genes were performed on both subsets. Tissues collected through targeted sampling exhibited significantly higher RNA quality than those obtained via random sampling. Histopathological analysis revealed cellular areas abundant in terminal ductular units within the targeted samples, and a final validation qPCR showed that the targeted samples were the most representative of normal breast glandular tissue. The comparative analysis of the two sampling methods clearly indicates that the targeted approach, with its superior accuracy and reliability, is the more practical choice for obtaining representative normal breast glandular tissue for "-omics" experiments.

摘要

分子谱分析是癌症治疗方案选择的关键环节,这凸显了对肿瘤组织和正常组织进行代表性采样的必要性。尽管人们对具有代表性的肿瘤采样给予了诸多关注,但在正常乳腺组织处理过程中RNA质量不佳这一问题上,却明显缺乏探索。同一患者的正常乳腺组织常被用作大多数“组学”实验的阴性对照。从正常乳腺组织中提取的RNA常常包含来自周围脂肪细胞、内皮细胞和免疫细胞的核酸,导致导管成分的代表性不足以及结果出现偏差。因此,确保乳腺腺组织的完整代表性至关重要。该研究旨在调查在将正常乳腺组织切片可视化为“组学”实验的阴性对照时,随机采样技术和靶向采样方法之间RNA富集的差异。选择了15名接受改良根治性乳房切除术的女性乳腺癌患者进行该研究。对正常乳腺组织进行肉眼检查,并从随机脂肪囊(随机采样)和纤维肌肉灰白色条纹区域(靶向采样)采集样本。分离RNA,随后进行分光光度分析、琼脂糖凝胶电泳和安捷伦磁带站分析。对两个亚组都进行了组织病理学评估和看家基因的基因表达研究。通过靶向采样收集的组织显示出比通过随机采样获得的组织显著更高的RNA质量。组织病理学分析显示靶向样本中终末导管单位丰富的细胞区域,最终的验证定量PCR表明靶向样本是正常乳腺腺组织最具代表性的样本。两种采样方法的比较分析清楚地表明,靶向方法具有更高的准确性和可靠性,是为“组学”实验获取具有代表性的正常乳腺腺组织的更实际选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4590/11631398/90673118fa36/bpae083f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验