• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 GIS 的多准则模糊方法选择适合建设基于 MSW 的发电厂和垃圾填埋场的地点:伊朗胡齐斯坦省的案例研究。

A GIS-based multi-criteria fuzzy approach to select a suitable location for a MSW-based power plant and landfill: a case study, Khuzestan province, Iran.

机构信息

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Feb 12;194(3):174. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-09809-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-022-09809-9
PMID:35150328
Abstract

The aim of this study was to find the best location for municipal solid waste (MSW)-based power plant and landfill. Another goal was to investigate the energy recovery potential of MSW by anaerobic digestion and recycling process. A combination of multi-criteria fuzzy decision making system was applied in GIS environment to select the most suitable site for MSW-based power plant and landfill. The effective sub-criteria were classified into three main categories of environmental, social, and economic criteria, and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process was used to weight and integrate them. The method was used in a case study to find the best location of MSW-based plant and landfill in Khuzestan province, Iran. Based on the amount of MSW production in this province and as a result, the potential for energy savings by recycling the recyclable part and recovering energy from the digestible part, the amount of fossil fuel that can be saved and the emission of greenhouse gases that can be avoided were estimated. Based on the results, in total, recycling the recyclable portion (dry waste) and producing energy from the digestible portion (wet waste) of MSW in Khuzestan province, leads to avoid burning 7.4 billion MJ of fossil fuels and emitting 644,169 t of COeq GHG. The results also showed that the integration of fuzzy logic and multi-criteria fuzzy decision making system provides more flexibility in choosing the best location for the MSW-based plant. This method is flexible enough and in other situations can include other necessary criteria and can provide a comprehensive guideline for decision makers in choosing the optimal location for a power plant or a landfill.

摘要

本研究旨在为城市固体废物(MSW)发电厂和垃圾填埋场找到最佳选址。另一个目标是通过厌氧消化和回收过程调查 MSW 的能源回收潜力。多标准模糊决策系统与 GIS 环境相结合,用于选择最适合 MSW 发电厂和垃圾填埋场的地点。有效子标准分为环境、社会和经济标准三大类,并采用模糊层次分析法对其进行加权和整合。该方法在伊朗胡齐斯坦省的一个案例研究中用于寻找 MSW 工厂和垃圾填埋场的最佳位置。根据该省的 MSW 产量,以及通过回收可回收部分和从可消化部分回收能源来节约能源的潜力、可以节约的化石燃料量以及可以避免的温室气体排放,对其进行了估算。根据结果,在胡齐斯坦省,回收可回收部分(干废物)并从可消化部分(湿废物)中生产能源,可避免燃烧 74 亿兆焦耳的化石燃料并排放 644169 吨 COeq GHG。结果还表明,模糊逻辑和多标准模糊决策系统的集成在选择 MSW 工厂的最佳位置方面提供了更大的灵活性。该方法足够灵活,在其他情况下可以包括其他必要的标准,并为决策者选择发电厂或垃圾填埋场的最佳位置提供全面的指导方针。

相似文献

1
A GIS-based multi-criteria fuzzy approach to select a suitable location for a MSW-based power plant and landfill: a case study, Khuzestan province, Iran.基于 GIS 的多准则模糊方法选择适合建设基于 MSW 的发电厂和垃圾填埋场的地点:伊朗胡齐斯坦省的案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Feb 12;194(3):174. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-09809-9.
2
Selection of MSW landfill site by fuzzy-AHP approach combined with GIS: case study in Ahvaz, Iran.运用模糊层次分析法(AHP)结合 GIS 选择 MSW 垃圾填埋场:伊朗阿瓦士案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jun 15;192(7):433. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08395-y.
3
Sanitary landfill site selection using GIS-based on a fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation technique: a case study of the City of Kraljevo, Serbia.基于模糊多准则评价技术的地理信息系统在垃圾填埋场选址中的应用:以塞尔维亚克拉列沃市为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37961-37980. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24884-8. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran.开发城市固体废物运输的碳足迹模型和环境影响分析:以伊朗德黑兰为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Dec;73(12):890-901. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2271424. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
5
Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study.模糊综合、Simos 与优势、劣势、机遇和威胁分析在城市固体废物填埋场选址中的应用:阿达纳市案例研究。
Waste Manag Res. 2020 May;38(1_suppl):45-64. doi: 10.1177/0734242X19893111. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
6
Integration of LCSA and GIS-based MCDM for sustainable landfill site selection: a case study.基于生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA)和地理信息系统(GIS)的多准则决策方法(MCDM)用于可持续垃圾填埋场选址:案例研究
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Mar 25;195(4):510. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11112-0.
7
A GIS-based novel approach for suitable sanitary landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and machine learning algorithms.基于 GIS 的新型方法,利用集成模糊层次分析法和机器学习算法进行合适的卫生填埋场选址。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(21):31511-31540. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17961-x. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
A spatial decision support system for municipal solid waste landfill sites (case study: The Mazandaran Province, Iran).一种用于城市固体垃圾填埋场的空间决策支持系统(案例研究:伊朗马赞德兰省)
Waste Manag Res. 2022 Jul;40(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/0734242X211060610. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
9
Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.评估英国城市固体废物能源回收的环境可持续性。
Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:346-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
10
Landfill siting for municipal solid waste using remote sensing and geographic information system integrated analytic hierarchy process and simple additive weighting methods from the point of view of a fast-growing metropolitan area in GAP area of Turkey.运用遥感和地理信息系统集成层次分析法和简单加和赋权法对土耳其加济安泰普快速发展大都市区的城市固体废物进行垃圾填埋场选址。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):4044-4061. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15951-7. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision support systems for waste-to-energy technologies: A systematic literature review of methods and future directions for sustainable implementation in Ghana.垃圾能源技术的决策支持系统:加纳可持续实施方法及未来方向的系统文献综述
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 8;11(3):e42353. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42353. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.