Suppr超能文献

HFNO 治疗急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者俯卧位与侧卧位的比较:一项多中心随机对照开放标签试验研究方案。

Prone versus lateral position in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with HFNO therapy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled open-label trial.

机构信息

The Second Clinical College, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Nov 27;24(1):762. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07761-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is a leading treatment technique for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), but its treatment failure rate remains high. The awake prone position (APP) has been proven to increase oxygenation and reduce the endotracheal intubation rate in patients with COVID-19-induced AHRF. However, the APP is poorly tolerated in patients, and its performance in improving prognoses is controversial. The lateral position has a similar mechanism and effect to the prone position, but it is more tolerable than the prone position. Therefore, it is worth exploring whether the lateral position is better for awake patients with AHRF.

METHODS

This is a protocol for a three-arm parallel-group multicentre randomised controlled open-label exploratory trial. A total of 583 patients from two hospitals in Chongqing, China, will be randomised to take the semi-recumbent position, lateral position, or prone position at a ratio of 1:1:1. Patients are all diagnosed with AHRF secondary to non-COVID-19 pneumonia or lung infection and receiving HFNO therapy. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days in 28 days. The secondary outcomes are the 28-day intubation rate, 28-day all-cause mortality, total position change time, the incidence of adverse events, number of hours using HFNO therapy, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and others. We will conduct subgroup analyses on the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspiration oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio (> 200 mmHg or ≤ 200 mmHg), time from admission to intervention implementation (< 24 h or ≥ 24 h), position changing time, and different diagnoses.

DISCUSSION

This trial will explore the prognostic effects of the APP with that of the lateral position in awake patients with non-COVID-19AHRF and compare the differences between them. To provide evidence for clinical decision-making and further research on position management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The registration number is ChiCTR2200055822 . Registered on January 20, 2022.

摘要

背景

高流量鼻氧(HFNO)治疗是急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)的主要治疗技术,但治疗失败率仍然很高。清醒俯卧位(APP)已被证明可增加氧合并降低 COVID-19 引起的 AHRF 患者的气管插管率。然而,APP 在患者中耐受性差,其改善预后的效果存在争议。侧卧位与俯卧位具有相似的机制和效果,但比俯卧位更耐受。因此,值得探讨侧卧位是否对清醒的 AHRF 患者更有利。

方法

这是一项三臂平行组多中心随机对照开放标签探索性试验的方案。来自中国重庆两家医院的 583 名患者将按照 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至半卧位、侧卧位或俯卧位。患者均诊断为非 COVID-19 肺炎或肺部感染引起的 AHRF,并接受 HFNO 治疗。主要结局是 28 天内无呼吸机天数。次要结局是 28 天内插管率、28 天内全因死亡率、总体位更换时间、不良事件发生率、HFNO 治疗时间、住院时间和重症监护病房(ICU)入住时间等。我们将对动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数(PaO2/FiO2)比值(>200mmHg 或≤200mmHg)、入院至干预实施时间(<24h 或≥24h)、体位更换时间和不同诊断进行亚组分析。

讨论

本试验将探讨 APP 在非 COVID-19 AHRF 清醒患者中的预后效果,并与侧卧位进行比较,为临床决策提供证据,并进一步研究体位管理。

试验注册

本试验在中国临床试验注册中心注册。注册号 ChiCTR2200055822。于 2022 年 1 月 20 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba8/10683165/298eed9b5ec3/13063_2023_7761_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验