• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道超声造影(HyFoSy)在疼痛和焦虑方面是否比子宫输卵管造影(HSG)更耐受?一项前瞻性真实世界设置多中心研究。

Is hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) more tolerable in terms of pain and anxiety than hysterosalpingography (HSG)? A prospective real-world setting multicentre study.

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Joaquín Rodrigo St, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, M-607, km. 9, 100, 28034, Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2022 Feb 13;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01606-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-022-01606-3
PMID:35152893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9909448/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 60% of sterile couples a female factor is present, with these being tubal factors in 30-50% of cases. A tubal patency test is also required in women without a male partner undergoing fertility treatment. Thus, an accurate, safe and tolerable technique should be available. The aim of this study is to determine and to compare hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and hysterosalpingography (HSG) tolerability in terms of pain and anxiety.

METHODS

This is a prospective real-world setting multicentre study conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Madrid. 210 infertile women/women without a male partner looking to get pregnant were recruited; 111 for the HyFoSy group and 99 for the HSG group. Tolerability was measured in terms of anxiety by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Median VAS score in HyFoSy group was 2 (P25; P75: 1; 3) versus 5 (4; 8) in HSG group, p < 0.001. The median State-STAI score in the HSG group was 18 points (10; 26) versus 10 (7; 16) in the HyFoSy group (p < 0.001); the median Trait-STAI score in the HSG group was 15 (11; 21) versus 13 (9; 17) in the HyFoSy group (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

HyFoSy shows higher tolerability to both: pain and anxiety. It is related to less pain and less post-test anxiety than HSG.

摘要

背景

在 60%的不育夫妇中,存在女性因素,其中 30-50%的病例是输卵管因素。在没有男性伴侣接受生育治疗的女性中,也需要进行输卵管通畅性测试。因此,应该有准确、安全和耐受良好的技术。本研究的目的是确定和比较子宫输卵管泡沫超声(HyFoSy)和子宫输卵管造影术(HSG)在疼痛和焦虑方面的耐受性。

方法

这是一项在马德里两家三级医院进行的前瞻性真实环境多中心研究。共招募了 210 名不孕或无男性伴侣的女性/希望怀孕的女性;111 名接受 HyFoSy 组,99 名接受 HSG 组。通过状态特质焦虑量表(STAI)评估焦虑,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛来衡量耐受性。

结果

HyFoSy 组的中位数 VAS 评分为 2(P25;P75:1;3),而 HSG 组为 5(4;8),p<0.001。HSG 组的中位数状态 STAI 评分为 18 分(10;26),而 HyFoSy 组为 10(7;16)(p<0.001);HSG 组的中位数特质 STAI 评分为 15(11;21),而 HyFoSy 组为 13(9;17)(p=0.044)。

结论

HyFoSy 在疼痛和焦虑两方面都具有更高的耐受性。它与 HSG 相比,疼痛更小,测试后焦虑更小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbcd/9909448/8dc1146b58bc/12905_2022_1606_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbcd/9909448/c85cd9414c7d/12905_2022_1606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbcd/9909448/8dc1146b58bc/12905_2022_1606_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbcd/9909448/c85cd9414c7d/12905_2022_1606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbcd/9909448/8dc1146b58bc/12905_2022_1606_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) more tolerable in terms of pain and anxiety than hysterosalpingography (HSG)? A prospective real-world setting multicentre study.经阴道超声造影(HyFoSy)在疼痛和焦虑方面是否比子宫输卵管造影(HSG)更耐受?一项前瞻性真实世界设置多中心研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Feb 13;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01606-3.
2
Can hysterosalpingo-foam sonography replace hysterosalpingography as first-choice tubal patency test? A randomized non-inferiority trial.经阴道超声造影检查能否替代子宫输卵管造影术成为首选的输卵管通畅性检查方法?一项随机非劣效性试验。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):969-979. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac034.
3
The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.FOAM研究:子宫输卵管泡沫超声检查(HyFoSy)在评估不孕女性输卵管通畅性方面是否是子宫输卵管造影术(HSG)的一种经济有效的替代方法?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Womens Health. 2018 May 9;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6.
4
Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography versus hysterosalpingography during fertility work-up: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.经阴道超声造影与子宫输卵管造影在生育评估中的应用:一项随机对照试验的经济学评价。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1222-1230. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae071.
5
Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.超声子宫输卵管声学造影术,与(系列)子宫输卵管造影术相比,在生育力评估期间进行输卵管通畅性检查的一种痛苦较小的方法:一项随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Sep;102(3):821-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.042. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
6
The effect of prior hysterosalpingo-foam sonography or hysterosalpingography on tubal patency: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.经阴道超声子宫输卵管声学造影或子宫输卵管造影对输卵管通畅性的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Nov 1;39(11):2485-2490. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae194.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy Study Comparing Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography and Hysterosalpingography for Fallopian Tube Patency Assessment.比较子宫输卵管泡沫超声造影和子宫输卵管造影评估输卵管通畅性的诊断准确性研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 15;10(18):4169. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184169.
8
Clinical Aspects of HyFoSy as Tubal Patency Test in Subfertility Workup.HyFoSy 在不孕症检查中作为输卵管通畅性测试的临床方面。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jul 8;2019:4827376. doi: 10.1155/2019/4827376. eCollection 2019.
9
One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.经阴道一步法三维子宫输卵管声学造影(3D-HyFoSy)用于 Essure®随访的确认性检查:一项多中心研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):134-141. doi: 10.1002/uog.17398.
10
Live birth after additional tubal flushing with oil-based contrast versus no additional flushing: a randomised, multicentre, parallel-group pragmatic trial in infertile women with at least one patent tube at hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HYFOIL study).经子宫输卵管声学造影后行油性造影剂输卵管通液术与不行通液术比较对提高活产率的影响:一项在至少一侧输卵管通畅的行子宫输卵管声学造影检查的不孕妇女中进行的随机、多中心、平行组实用性试验(HYFOIL 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):e054845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054845.

引用本文的文献

1
Tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during hysterosalpingography versus tubal flushing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in infertile women undergoing fertility work-up: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (FOil study).经子宫输卵管造影术行油性造影剂输卵管通液术与子宫输卵管超声造影术行泡沫状造影剂输卵管通液术在不孕女性生育力检查中的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案(FOil 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 24;14(11):e091778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091778.
2
No pain relief by virtual reality during hysterosalpingography (HSG): results from a randomized controlled trial.虚拟现实在子宫输卵管造影(HSG)中不能缓解疼痛:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Sep 1;39(9):1987-1995. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae133.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility, tolerability, and safety of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (hyfosy). multicenter, prospective Spanish study.经阴道超声造影(hyfosy)的可行性、耐受性和安全性。多中心、前瞻性西班牙研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 May;50(5):102004. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102004. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography: Pain perception and factors influencing pain severity.经阴道四维子宫输卵管造影超声检查:疼痛感知及影响疼痛严重程度的因素
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Jan;47(1):302-310. doi: 10.1111/jog.14538. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
3
Spontaneous conception outcome in infertile women after four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography.
Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography versus hysterosalpingography during fertility work-up: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.
经阴道超声造影与子宫输卵管造影在生育评估中的应用:一项随机对照试验的经济学评价。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1222-1230. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae071.
4
Response to Letter to the Editor From Marin et al: "The SELFI Study: Iodine Excess and Thyroid Dysfunction in Women Undergoing Oil-Soluble Contrast Hysterosalpingography".对马林等人致编辑信的回复:“SELFI研究:接受油溶性造影剂子宫输卵管造影术的女性碘过量与甲状腺功能障碍”
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Aug 18;108(9):e902-e903. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad169.
四维子宫输卵管超声造影后不孕妇女的自然受孕结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03315-x.
4
Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing Clinician.真实世界临床数据对临床医生的解读和影响。
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):1763-1774. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
5
Assessment of the Influence on Spontaneous Pregnancy of Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography.子宫输卵管造影超声检查对自然妊娠的影响评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Sep 20;2018:4901281. doi: 10.1155/2018/4901281. eCollection 2018.
6
The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.FOAM研究:子宫输卵管泡沫超声检查(HyFoSy)在评估不孕女性输卵管通畅性方面是否是子宫输卵管造影术(HSG)的一种经济有效的替代方法?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Womens Health. 2018 May 9;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6.
7
Inter-Rater Reliability of Air/Saline HyCoSy, HyFoSy and HyFoSy Combined With Power Doppler for Screening Tubal Patency.空气/盐水超声造影、超声造影联合超声造影联合能量多普勒在输卵管通畅性筛查中的观察者间可靠性。
Ultraschall Med. 2019 Feb;40(1):47-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120111. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
8
Prospective Study of Concordance Between Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography and Hysteroscopy for Evaluation of the Uterine Cavity in Patients Undergoing Infertility Studies.子宫输卵管造影超声检查与宫腔镜检查在不孕症患者子宫腔评估中的一致性前瞻性研究
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Jun;37(6):1431-1437. doi: 10.1002/jum.14483. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy): Tolerability, safety and the occurrence of pregnancy post-procedure.子宫输卵管泡沫超声造影(HyFoSy):耐受性、安全性及术后妊娠情况。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Feb;58(1):114-118. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12716. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
10
Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.超声子宫输卵管造影联合宫腔声学造影与腹腔镜下美蓝通液术诊断输卵管通畅性的对比研究
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):758-769. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex013.