Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul;48(7):1631-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.01.030. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
INTRODUCTION: Intensive local treatment comprising total mesorectal excision (TME) with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has received attention among clinicians treating rectal cancer. It remains unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after intensive local treatment is beneficial for these patients. We evaluated the oncologic benefit of ACT for patients with LARC who received intensive local treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included 737 patients treated in Japan and Korea between 2010 and 2017. The effectiveness of ACT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with subgroup analyses to identify subpopulations potentially benefiting from ACT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 49 months; the 5-year RFS and local recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 72.1% and 4.9%, respectively; 514 patients (69.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, without an oncologic benefit (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.68) demonstrated in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. In subgroup analyses, the distributions of the 95% CI in patients aged ≥70 years and those with ypStage 0 tended to place a disproportionate emphasis that favoured the non-ACT treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: Despite achieving good local control with intensive local treatment strategy, the effectiveness of ACT for the LARC patients with CRT followed by TME with selective LPND was not proved. Elderly patients and those with ypStage0 may not receive benefit from ACT after CRT and TME ± LPND.
简介:在新辅助放化疗(CRT)后,对于局部进展期直肠癌(LARC)患者,采用全直肠系膜切除术(TME)联合选择性侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPND)的强化局部治疗策略受到临床医生的关注。对于接受强化局部治疗的 LARC 患者,辅助化疗(ACT)是否有益尚不清楚。我们评估了强化局部治疗后接受 ACT 的 LARC 患者的肿瘤学获益。 材料和方法:这是一项在日本和韩国进行的国际多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2010 年至 2017 年期间接受治疗的 737 例患者。使用单变量和多变量 Cox 比例风险模型评估 ACT 对无复发生存(RFS)的有效性,并进行亚组分析以确定可能从 ACT 中获益的亚人群。 结果:中位随访时间为 49 个月;全队列的 5 年 RFS 和局部复发率分别为 72.1%和 4.9%;514 例患者(69.7%)接受了辅助化疗,但多变量 Cox 回归分析显示 ACT 并未带来肿瘤学获益(风险比,1.14;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.79-1.68)。在亚组分析中,年龄≥70 岁和 ypStage0 患者的 95%CI 分布倾向于过分强调非 ACT 治疗策略的优势。 结论:尽管采用强化局部治疗策略可获得良好的局部控制,但对于 CRT 后接受 TME 联合选择性 LPND 的 LARC 患者,ACT 的有效性并未得到证实。老年患者和 ypStage0 患者可能无法从 CRT 和 TME±LPND 后接受 ACT 中获益。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019-4-22
World J Gastroenterol. 2020-6-7
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015-7
World J Surg Oncol. 2024-6-12