海马体的放射组学特征用于诊断早发型和晚发型阿尔茨海默病
Radiomic Features of the Hippocampus for Diagnosing Early-Onset and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.
作者信息
Du Yang, Zhang Shaowei, Fang Yuan, Qiu Qi, Zhao Lu, Wei Wenjing, Tang Yingying, Li Xia
机构信息
Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
出版信息
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jan 26;13:789099. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.789099. eCollection 2021.
: Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) and early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) are different subtypes of AD. This study aimed to build and validate radiomics models of the hippocampus for EOAD and young controls (YCs), LOAD and old controls (OCs), as well as EOAD and LOAD. : Thirty-six EOAD patients, 36 LOAD patients, 36 YCs, and 36 OCs from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were enrolled and allocated to training and test sets of the EOAD-YC groups, LOAD-OC groups, and EOAD-LOAD groups. Independent external validation sets including 15 EOAD patients, 15 LOAD patients, 15 YCs, and 15 OCs from Shanghai Mental Health Center were constructed, respectively. Bilateral hippocampal segmentation and feature extraction were performed for each subject, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to select radiomic features. Support vector machine (SVM) models were constructed based on the identified features to distinguish EOAD from YC subjects, LOAD from OC subjects, and EOAD from LOAD subjects. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. : Three, three, and four features were selected for EOAD and YC subjects, LOAD and OC subjects, and EOAD and LOAD subjects, respectively. The AUC and accuracy of the SVM model were 0.90 and 0.77 in the test set and 0.91 and 0.87 in the validation set for EOAD and YC subjects, respectively; for LOAD and OC subjects, the AUC and accuracy were 0.94 and 0.86 in the test set and 0.92 and 0.78 in the validation set, respectively. For the SVM model of EOAD and LOAD subjects, the AUC was 0.87 and the accuracy was 0.79 in the test set; additionally, the AUC was 0.86 and the accuracy was 0.77 in the validation set. : The findings of this study provide insights into the potential of hippocampal radiomic features as biomarkers to diagnose EOAD and LOAD. This study is the first to show that SVM classification analysis based on hippocampal radiomic features is a valuable method for clinical applications in EOAD.
迟发性阿尔茨海默病(LOAD)和早发性阿尔茨海默病(EOAD)是阿尔茨海默病的不同亚型。本研究旨在构建并验证用于EOAD与年轻对照(YC)、LOAD与老年对照(OC)以及EOAD与LOAD的海马区放射组学模型。
从阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议(ADNI)数据库中纳入36例EOAD患者、36例LOAD患者、36例YC和36例OC,并将其分配到EOAD - YC组、LOAD - OC组和EOAD - LOAD组的训练集和测试集。分别构建了来自上海精神卫生中心的包括15例EOAD患者、15例LOAD患者、15例YC和15例OC的独立外部验证集。对每个受试者进行双侧海马分割和特征提取,并使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)方法选择放射组学特征。基于识别出的特征构建支持向量机(SVM)模型,以区分EOAD与YC受试者、LOAD与OC受试者以及EOAD与LOAD受试者。采用受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积评估模型性能。
对于EOAD与YC受试者、LOAD与OC受试者以及EOAD与LOAD受试者,分别选择了3个、3个和4个特征。对于EOAD与YC受试者,SVM模型在测试集中的AUC和准确率分别为0.90和0.77,在验证集中分别为0.91和0.87;对于LOAD与OC受试者,测试集中AUC和准确率分别为0.94和0.86,验证集中分别为0.92和0.78。对于EOAD与LOAD受试者的SVM模型,测试集中AUC为0.87,准确率为0.79;此外,验证集中AUC为0.86,准确率为0.77。
本研究结果为海马区放射组学特征作为诊断EOAD和LOAD的生物标志物的潜力提供了见解。本研究首次表明,基于海马区放射组学特征的SVM分类分析是一种在EOAD临床应用中有价值的方法。
相似文献
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022-1-26
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018-9-25
引用本文的文献
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-6-10
Digit Health. 2025-4-22
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025-2-4
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2023-11-1
本文引用的文献
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021-7-15
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021-1-19
J Nucl Med. 2020-2-14
Acad Radiol. 2020-2-10
Front Aging Neurosci. 2019-11-21
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021-6