• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于个性化粪便潜血检测的结直肠癌筛查的进化算法。

An Evolutionary Algorithm to Personalize Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening.

作者信息

van Duuren Luuk A, Ozik Jonathan, Spliet Remy, Collier Nicholson T, Lansdorp-Vogelaar Iris, Meester Reinier G S

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Decision and Infrastructure Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, United States.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2022 Jan 26;12:718276. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.718276. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2021.718276
PMID:35153804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8826712/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an established method for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Measured FIT-concentrations are associated with both present and future risk of CRC, and may be used for personalized screening. However, evaluation of personalized screening is computationally challenging. In this study, a broadly applicable algorithm is presented to efficiently optimize personalized screening policies that prescribe screening intervals and FIT-cutoffs, based on age and FIT-history.

METHODS

We present a mathematical framework for personalized screening policies and a bi-objective evolutionary algorithm that identifies policies with minimal costs and maximal health benefits. The algorithm is combined with an established microsimulation model (MISCAN-Colon), to accurately estimate the costs and benefits of generated policies, without restrictive Markov assumptions. The performance of the algorithm is demonstrated in three experiments.

RESULTS

In Experiment 1, a relatively small benchmark problem, the optimal policies were known. The algorithm approached the maximum feasible benefits with a relative difference of 0.007%. Experiment 2 optimized both intervals and cutoffs, Experiment 3 optimized cutoffs only. Optimal policies in both experiments are unknown. Compared to policies recently evaluated for the USPSTF, personalized screening increased health benefits up to 14 and 4.3%, for Experiments 2 and 3, respectively, without adding costs. Generated policies have several features concordant with current screening recommendations.

DISCUSSION

The method presented in this paper is flexible and capable of optimizing personalized screening policies evaluated with computationally-intensive but established simulation models. It can be used to inform screening policies for CRC or other diseases. For CRC, more debate is needed on what features a policy needs to exhibit to make it suitable for implementation in practice.

摘要

背景

粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)是一种既定的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查方法。所测得的FIT浓度与CRC的当前和未来风险均相关,可用于个性化筛查。然而,对个性化筛查进行评估在计算上具有挑战性。在本研究中,我们提出了一种广泛适用的算法,以基于年龄和FIT检测史有效地优化规定筛查间隔和FIT临界值的个性化筛查策略。

方法

我们提出了一个用于个性化筛查策略的数学框架以及一种双目标进化算法,该算法可识别成本最小且健康效益最大的策略。该算法与一个既定的微观模拟模型(MISCAN - 结肠模型)相结合,以在无需严格马尔可夫假设的情况下准确估计所生成策略的成本和效益。该算法的性能在三个实验中得到了验证。

结果

在实验1中,这是一个相对较小的基准问题,最优策略是已知的。该算法接近了最大可行效益,相对差异为0.007%。实验2同时优化了间隔和临界值,实验3仅优化了临界值。这两个实验中的最优策略均未知。与最近为美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)评估的策略相比,个性化筛查分别使实验2和实验3的健康效益提高了14%和4.3%,且未增加成本。所生成的策略具有一些与当前筛查建议相符的特征。

讨论

本文提出的方法具有灵活性,能够优化通过计算密集型但既定的模拟模型评估的个性化筛查策略。它可用于为CRC或其他疾病的筛查策略提供信息。对于CRC而言,对于一项策略需要具备哪些特征才能使其适合在实际中实施,仍需要更多的讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/573ec1b2e7a6/fphys-12-718276-g0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/cc782b92e7dd/fphys-12-718276-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/97423663fe12/fphys-12-718276-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/58b3fdc22f80/fphys-12-718276-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/545eb47e0d12/fphys-12-718276-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/70cfb2928dd9/fphys-12-718276-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/92f675ffc89b/fphys-12-718276-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/959f2e4fc35b/fphys-12-718276-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/f6aab0e8f1a6/fphys-12-718276-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/74bc3f6fe54b/fphys-12-718276-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/3ceddfefdf8c/fphys-12-718276-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/9c137a11ad20/fphys-12-718276-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/e91375076e79/fphys-12-718276-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/68bb0741a89e/fphys-12-718276-g0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/1feb60190c46/fphys-12-718276-g0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/573ec1b2e7a6/fphys-12-718276-g0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/cc782b92e7dd/fphys-12-718276-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/97423663fe12/fphys-12-718276-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/58b3fdc22f80/fphys-12-718276-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/545eb47e0d12/fphys-12-718276-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/70cfb2928dd9/fphys-12-718276-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/92f675ffc89b/fphys-12-718276-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/959f2e4fc35b/fphys-12-718276-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/f6aab0e8f1a6/fphys-12-718276-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/74bc3f6fe54b/fphys-12-718276-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/3ceddfefdf8c/fphys-12-718276-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/9c137a11ad20/fphys-12-718276-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/e91375076e79/fphys-12-718276-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/68bb0741a89e/fphys-12-718276-g0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/1feb60190c46/fphys-12-718276-g0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf3c/8826712/573ec1b2e7a6/fphys-12-718276-g0015.jpg

相似文献

1
An Evolutionary Algorithm to Personalize Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening.一种用于个性化粪便潜血检测的结直肠癌筛查的进化算法。
Front Physiol. 2022 Jan 26;12:718276. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.718276. eCollection 2021.
2
Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT).基于 FIT 基础结直肠癌筛查方案中既往 f-Hb 浓度的定制间隔的个性化结直肠癌筛查:基于效果的混合方法研究方案
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 22;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1.
3
Colorectal Cancer Screening within Colonoscopy Capacity Constraints: Can FIT-Based Programs Save More Lives by Trading off More Sensitive Test Cutoffs against Longer Screening Intervals?结肠镜检查能力受限情况下的结直肠癌筛查:基于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的项目能否通过权衡更敏感的检测临界值与更长的筛查间隔来挽救更多生命?
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 May 7;7(1):23814683221097064. doi: 10.1177/23814683221097064. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
4
5
The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.45 岁及以上商业和医疗保险人群非侵入性基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查产品的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1219-1226. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2260681. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
6
Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.高性能生物标志物检测与粪便免疫化学检测用于非侵入性结直肠癌筛查的成本效益比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;16(4):504-512.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
7
Optimizing Screening for Colorectal Cancer: An Algorithm Combining Fecal Immunochemical Test, Blood-Based Cancer-Associated Proteins and Demographics to Reduce Colonoscopy Burden.优化结直肠癌筛查:一种结合粪便免疫化学检测、血液癌症相关蛋白和人口统计学信息以降低结肠镜检查负担的算法。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2023 Jun;22(2):199-210. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
8
USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing.美国预防服务工作组结直肠癌筛查指南:对多年间隔期检测的深入探讨
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb 1;22(2):e77-81.
9
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies Using Active Learning and Monte Carlo Simulation.基于主动学习和蒙特卡罗模拟的结直肠癌筛查策略的成本效益分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):554-571. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241258224. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
10
Population health outcomes of blood-based screening for colorectal cancer in comparison to current screening modalities: insights from a discrete-event simulation model incorporating longitudinal adherence.基于血液的结直肠癌筛查与当前筛查方式的人群健康结果比较:纳入纵向依从性的离散事件模拟模型的见解。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):991-1002. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2382036. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417.
2
Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的一项更新建模研究。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1998-2011. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5746.
3
Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe.
用于预测欧洲结直肠癌筛查益处的三种区域微观模拟模型的开发与验证
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 29;6(1):2381468320984974. doi: 10.1177/2381468320984974. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
4
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Validation of Colorectal Cancer Models on Long-term Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial.验证结直肠癌模型对随机对照试验长期结局的预测价值。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Nov;40(8):1034-1040. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20961095. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.美国肺癌筛查的成本效益分析:一项比较建模研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):796-804. doi: 10.7326/M19-0322. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
7
FROM DESKTOP TO LARGE-SCALE MODEL EXPLORATION WITH SWIFT/T.借助SWIFT/T从桌面探索到大规模模型探索
Proc Winter Simul Conf. 2016 Dec;2016:206-220. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2016.7822090. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
8
Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results.结直肠癌筛查中的建模:使用 NORCCAP 试验结果评估 MISCAN-Colon 微观模拟模型的外部和预测有效性。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):917-929. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18806497. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
9
Optimizing colorectal cancer screening by race and sex: Microsimulation analysis II to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.优化基于种族和性别的结直肠癌筛查:为美国癌症协会结直肠癌筛查指南提供信息的微模拟分析 II
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):2974-2985. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31542. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Introduction to the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Breast Cancer Models.癌症干预和监测建模网络 (CISNET) 乳腺癌模型简介。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Apr;38(1_suppl):3S-8S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17737507.