• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测欧洲结直肠癌筛查益处的三种区域微观模拟模型的开发与验证

Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe.

作者信息

Gini Andrea, Buskermolen Maaike, Senore Carlo, Anttila Ahti, Novak Mlakar Dominika, Veerus Piret, Csanádi Marcell, Jansen Erik E L, Zielonke Nadine, Heinävaara Sirpa, Széles György, Segnan Nereo, de Koning Harry J, Lansdorp-Vogelaar Iris

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

SC Epidemiology, Screening, Cancer Registry, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, CPO, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 29;6(1):2381468320984974. doi: 10.1177/2381468320984974. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/2381468320984974
PMID:33598546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7863172/
Abstract

Validated microsimulation models have been shown to be useful tools in providing support for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decisions. Aiming to assist European countries in reducing CRC mortality, we developed and validated three regional models for evaluating CRC screening in Europe. Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon (MISCAN-Colon) model versions for Italy, Slovenia, and Finland were quantified using data from different national institutions. These models were validated against the best available evidence for the effectiveness of screening from their region (when available): the Screening for COlon REctum (SCORE) trial and the Florentine fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening study for Italy; the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trial and the guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) Finnish population-based study for Finland. When published evidence was not available (Slovenia), the model was validated using cancer registry data. Our three models reproduced age-specific CRC incidence rates and stage distributions in the prescreening period. Moreover, the Italian and Finnish models replicated CRC mortality reductions (reasonably) well against the best available evidence. CRC mortality reductions were predicted slightly larger than those observed (except for the Florentine FIT study), but consistently within the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Our findings corroborate the MISCAN-Colon reliability in supporting decision making on CRC screening. Furthermore, our study provides the model structure for an additional tool (EU-TOPIA CRC evaluation tool: http://miscan.eu-topia.org) that aims to help policymakers and researchers monitoring or improving CRC screening in Europe.

摘要

经验证的微观模拟模型已被证明是为结直肠癌(CRC)筛查决策提供支持的有用工具。为了帮助欧洲国家降低结直肠癌死亡率,我们开发并验证了三个用于评估欧洲结直肠癌筛查的区域模型。利用来自不同国家机构的数据,对意大利、斯洛文尼亚和芬兰的微观模拟筛查分析-结肠癌(MISCAN-Colon)模型版本进行了量化。这些模型根据其所在地区筛查有效性的最佳现有证据(如有)进行了验证:意大利的结直肠癌筛查(SCORE)试验和佛罗伦萨粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)筛查研究;芬兰的挪威结直肠癌预防(NORCCAP)试验和基于芬兰人群的愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(gFOBT)研究。当没有已发表的证据时(斯洛文尼亚),则使用癌症登记数据对模型进行验证。我们的三个模型再现了筛查前期特定年龄的结直肠癌发病率和分期分布。此外,意大利和芬兰的模型与最佳现有证据相比,(合理地)很好地复制了结直肠癌死亡率的降低情况。预测的结直肠癌死亡率降低幅度略大于观察到的幅度(佛罗伦萨FIT研究除外),但始终在相应的95%置信区间内。我们的研究结果证实了MISCAN-Colon在支持结直肠癌筛查决策方面的可靠性。此外,我们的研究为另一个工具(欧盟-TOPIA CRC评估工具:http://miscan.eu-topia.org)提供了模型结构,该工具旨在帮助政策制定者和研究人员监测或改善欧洲的结直肠癌筛查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc2/7863172/353c24f149cf/10.1177_2381468320984974-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc2/7863172/0e9e62c31284/10.1177_2381468320984974-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc2/7863172/353c24f149cf/10.1177_2381468320984974-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc2/7863172/0e9e62c31284/10.1177_2381468320984974-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc2/7863172/353c24f149cf/10.1177_2381468320984974-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Three Regional Microsimulation Models for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits in Europe.用于预测欧洲结直肠癌筛查益处的三种区域微观模拟模型的开发与验证
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 29;6(1):2381468320984974. doi: 10.1177/2381468320984974. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
2
Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results.结直肠癌筛查中的建模:使用 NORCCAP 试验结果评估 MISCAN-Colon 微观模拟模型的外部和预测有效性。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):917-929. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18806497. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
3
The EU-TOPIA evaluation tool: An online modelling-based tool for informing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening decisions in Europe.欧盟-乌托邦评估工具:一种基于在线建模的工具,用于为欧洲的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查决策提供信息。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Apr 30;22:101392. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101392. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Screening for colon cancer: A test for occult blood.结肠癌筛查:一项潜血检测。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S110-1. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150712.
5
Validation of Microsimulation Models against Alternative Model Predictions and Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials.验证针对替代模型预测和随机对照试验长期结直肠癌发病率和死亡率结局的微观模拟模型。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Aug;40(6):815-829. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20944869.
6
Longitudinal Adherence to Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing vs Guaiac-based FOBT in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.在一项有组织的结直肠癌筛查计划中,免疫化学粪便潜血试验与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验的纵向依从性比较。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 May;12(5):327-334. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0091. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
8
9
Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.高性能生物标志物检测与粪便免疫化学检测用于非侵入性结直肠癌筛查的成本效益比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;16(4):504-512.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling and the Use of Surrogate Endpoints: Is This a Valid Approach?替代终点的建模与应用:这是一种有效的方法吗?
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 May;70(5):1711-1722. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08725-x. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Population-level impact of the BMJ Rapid Recommendation for colorectal cancer screening: a microsimulation analysis.人群层面上 BMJ 快速推荐结直肠癌筛查的影响:一项微观模拟分析。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 May 9;11(1):e001344. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001344.
3
Reduction in colorectal cancer incidence by screening endoscopy.

本文引用的文献

1
Microsimulation Modeling in Oncology.肿瘤学中的微观模拟建模
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-11. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00029.
2
Opportunities and Challenges in Moving From Current Guidelines to Personalized Colorectal Cancer Screening.从现行指南转向个性化结直肠癌筛查的机遇与挑战
Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar;156(4):904-917. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
3
Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results.
内镜筛查可降低结直肠癌发病率。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;21(2):125-133. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00847-3. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌(CRC)筛查对降低全因死亡率和CRC特异性死亡率的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;15(7):1948. doi: 10.3390/cancers15071948.
5
An Evolutionary Algorithm to Personalize Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening.一种用于个性化粪便潜血检测的结直肠癌筛查的进化算法。
Front Physiol. 2022 Jan 26;12:718276. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.718276. eCollection 2021.
6
The EU-TOPIA evaluation tool: An online modelling-based tool for informing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening decisions in Europe.欧盟-乌托邦评估工具:一种基于在线建模的工具,用于为欧洲的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查决策提供信息。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Apr 30;22:101392. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101392. eCollection 2021 Jun.
结直肠癌筛查中的建模:使用 NORCCAP 试验结果评估 MISCAN-Colon 微观模拟模型的外部和预测有效性。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):917-929. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18806497. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
4
Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018.欧洲癌症发病率和死亡率模式:2018 年 40 个国家和 25 种主要癌症的估计值。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
5
The impact of the rising colorectal cancer incidence in young adults on the optimal age to start screening: Microsimulation analysis I to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.年轻人结直肠癌发病率上升对最佳筛查起始年龄的影响:为美国癌症协会结直肠癌筛查指南提供信息的 I 号微观模拟分析
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):2964-2973. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31543. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial.结肠镜筛查对女性和男性结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的长期效果:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jun 5;168(11):775-782. doi: 10.7326/M17-1441. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
7
Long term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 17 years of follow-up: the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial.17年随访后单次柔性乙状结肠镜筛查的长期效果:英国柔性乙状结肠镜筛查随机对照试验
Lancet. 2017 Apr 1;389(10076):1299-1311. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30396-3. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
8
Strong subsite-specific variation in detecting advanced adenomas by fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin.粪便血红蛋白免疫化学检测检测进展性腺瘤的亚部位特异性变化很大。
Int J Cancer. 2017 May 1;140(9):2015-2022. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30629. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查策略的益处、负担及危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.
10
Cancer and aging: Epidemiology and methodological challenges.癌症与衰老:流行病学及方法学挑战
Acta Oncol. 2016;55 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-12. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114670. Epub 2016 Jan 12.