Bussey H I, Watson W A, Hawkins D W, Wang P
Ther Drug Monit. 1986;8(1):90-4. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198603000-00014.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new fluorescence polarization immunoassay, TDx, for digitoxin by comparing the results of this assay with those of a radioimmunoassay (RIA). Thirty-three serum samples were obtained from 15 patients during, and for 4 weeks after, a 4-week course of digitoxin therapy. Each sample was separated by centrifugation, coded, and frozen until analysis. At the time of analysis, each sample was divided and analyzed simultaneously by TDx and RIA. Nine samples yielded results less than 2 ng/ml (limit of assay sensitivity) by one or both methods and were excluded from further data analysis. Linear regression analysis of the results of the remaining 24 paired samples (x = TDx, y = RIA) revealed a strong correlation coefficient of r2 = 0.95, slope = 0.95, and a y intercept of -0.99 (y = -0.99 + 0.95x). Additionally, the TDx results were lower than the RIA values in only five of 33 paired samples; and these occurred in four patients who had a significantly lower mean estimated creatinine clearance than that of the other 11 patients (39.0 +/- 9.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 63.3 +/- 11.8 ml/min/1.73 m2, p less than 0.01). The TDx system is a comparable alternative to the RIA method, but differences in specificity and sensitivity may exist and should be evaluated more thoroughly.
本研究的目的是通过将一种新的荧光偏振免疫分析法(TDx)检测洋地黄毒苷的结果与放射免疫分析法(RIA)的结果进行比较,来评估该方法。在15例患者接受为期4周的洋地黄毒苷治疗期间及其后4周内,采集了33份血清样本。每份样本经离心分离、编码后冷冻,直至进行分析。分析时,将每份样本分成两份,同时用TDx和RIA进行分析。9份样本通过一种或两种方法得出的结果低于2 ng/ml(分析灵敏度限值),被排除在进一步的数据分析之外。对其余24对配对样本(x = TDx,y = RIA)的结果进行线性回归分析,结果显示相关系数r2 = 0.95,斜率 = 0.95,y轴截距为 -0.99(y = -0.99 + 0.95x)。此外,在33对配对样本中,只有5对样本的TDx结果低于RIA值;这5对样本出现在4例患者中,这些患者的平均估计肌酐清除率明显低于其他11例患者(39.0 +/- 9.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 对比 63.3 +/- 11.8 ml/min/1.73 m2,p < 0.01)。TDx系统是RIA方法的一种可比替代方法,但可能存在特异性和灵敏度方面的差异,应进行更全面的评估。