• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证世界卫生组织父母疫苗犹豫量表在中国使用儿童疫苗接种数据。

Validation of the World Health Organization's parental vaccine hesitancy scale in China using child vaccination data.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, PR China.

Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, PR China.

出版信息

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):2021060. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2021060. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1080/21645515.2021.2021060
PMID:35156907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8986264/
Abstract

Evidence for the validity and reliability of the World Health Organization's 10-item vaccine hesitancy scale (VHS) in different settings is not sufficient, especially for criteria validity. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the VHS using child vaccination data in China. A cross-sectional survey was performed with parents of 19-48-month-old children at six vaccination clinics in Wuxi City between September and October 2020. The VHS was revised to category A (expanded program on immunization, EPI) VHS and category B (Non-EPI) VHS. Factor analysis was used to confirm the latent domain and to assess the model structure. The average variance extracted (AVE) was calculated to assess convergent validity, and Cronbach's α and composite reliability (CR) were used to determine internal consistency. The association between VHS scores and children's vaccination status was examined to assess criteria validity using logistic regression. The survey response rate was 75.3% (n = 802). Two factors were identified, explaining 64.60% and 63.34% of the common variance in categories A and B VHS, respectively. The Cronbach's α of > 0.7 and CR of >0.7 in the scale indicated the VHS has acceptable internal consistency. The AVE values indicated that convergent validity was not ideal for the VHS. There were no statistically significant associations between VHS scores and vaccination status, indicating that the criterion validity was not ideal. The VHS needs improvement before becoming a standard survey tool.

摘要

世界卫生组织的 10 项疫苗犹豫量表(VHS)在不同环境中的有效性和可靠性的证据不足,特别是在标准有效性方面。本研究旨在使用中国儿童疫苗接种数据评估 VHS 的有效性和可靠性。2020 年 9 月至 10 月,在无锡市的六个接种诊所对 19-48 个月大儿童的父母进行了横断面调查。VHS 修订为类别 A(扩大免疫规划,EPI)VHS 和类别 B(非 EPI)VHS。采用因子分析来确认潜在域,并评估模型结构。计算平均方差提取(AVE)以评估收敛有效性,使用 Cronbach 的α和综合可靠性(CR)来确定内部一致性。使用逻辑回归检查 VHS 评分与儿童疫苗接种状况之间的关联,以评估标准有效性。调查的回复率为 75.3%(n=802)。确定了两个因素,分别解释了类别 A 和 B VHS 中共同方差的 64.60%和 63.34%。量表的 Cronbach's α>0.7 和 CR>0.7 表明 VHS 具有可接受的内部一致性。AVE 值表明 VHS 的收敛有效性不理想。VHS 评分与疫苗接种状况之间没有统计学上的显著关联,表明标准有效性不理想。在成为标准调查工具之前,VHS 需要改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfa/8986264/f5623d9067ef/KHVI_A_2021060_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfa/8986264/3d99077d17fe/KHVI_A_2021060_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfa/8986264/411346c83c34/KHVI_A_2021060_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfa/8986264/f5623d9067ef/KHVI_A_2021060_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfa/8986264/3d99077d17fe/KHVI_A_2021060_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfa/8986264/411346c83c34/KHVI_A_2021060_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfa/8986264/f5623d9067ef/KHVI_A_2021060_F0003_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the World Health Organization's parental vaccine hesitancy scale in China using child vaccination data.验证世界卫生组织父母疫苗犹豫量表在中国使用儿童疫苗接种数据。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):2021060. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2021060. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
2
Vaccine hesitancy in Argentina: Validation of WHO scale for parents.阿根廷的疫苗犹豫:世界卫生组织父母量表的验证。
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 30;39(33):4611-4619. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.080. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Parental hesitancy toward children vaccination: a multi-country psychometric and predictive study.家长对儿童疫苗接种的犹豫:一项多国家心理测量学和预测性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 18;24(1):1348. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18806-1.
4
Psychometric validation of the Korean versions of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale and Vaccination Attitudes Examination Scale.疫苗犹豫量表和疫苗态度量表韩文版的心理测量学验证。
Vaccine. 2023 Jul 19;41(32):4685-4692. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.046. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
5
Vaccine Hesitancy: COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccine Willingness among Parents in Wuxi, China-A Cross-Sectional Study.疫苗犹豫:中国无锡家长对新冠疫苗和流感疫苗的接种意愿——一项横断面研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;9(4):342. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040342.
6
Psychometric validation of a chinese version of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale: a cross-sectional study.中文版 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫量表的心理测量学验证:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 1;22(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07746-z.
7
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a vaccine hesitancy scale on knowledge, attitude, trust and vaccination environment (KATE-S) in Chinese parents.中国家长对疫苗犹豫量表(知识、态度、信任和疫苗接种环境量表,KATE-S)的信效度评估。
Vaccine. 2022 May 9;40(21):2933-2939. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.068. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Assessing vaccine hesitancy using the WHO scale for caregivers of children under 3 years old in China.采用世卫组织针对 3 岁以下儿童照料者的量表评估疫苗犹豫情况。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 12;11:1090609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1090609. eCollection 2023.
9
Parental category B vaccine hesitancy and associated factors in China: an online cross-sectional survey.中国父母二类疫苗犹豫及其相关因素:一项在线横断面调查。
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Jan;21(1):145-153. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2008247. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
10
The vaccine hesitancy scale: Psychometric properties and validation.疫苗犹豫量表:心理测量学特性和验证。
Vaccine. 2018 Jan 29;36(5):660-667. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.043. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental hesitancy toward children vaccination: a multi-country psychometric and predictive study.家长对儿童疫苗接种的犹豫:一项多国家心理测量学和预测性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 18;24(1):1348. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18806-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting the 2014-15 Disneyland measles outbreak and its influence on pediatric vaccinations.重新审视 2014-2015 年迪士尼乐园麻疹爆发及其对儿童疫苗接种的影响。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Nov 2;17(11):4210-4215. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1972707. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
2
Vaccine hesitancy in Argentina: Validation of WHO scale for parents.阿根廷的疫苗犹豫:世界卫生组织父母量表的验证。
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 30;39(33):4611-4619. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.080. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Vaccine Hesitancy: COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccine Willingness among Parents in Wuxi, China-A Cross-Sectional Study.
疫苗犹豫:中国无锡家长对新冠疫苗和流感疫苗的接种意愿——一项横断面研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;9(4):342. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040342.
4
A validated modification of the vaccine hesitancy scale for childhood, influenza and HPV vaccines.用于儿童、流感和 HPV 疫苗的疫苗犹豫量表的验证性修正。
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 26;39(13):1831-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Resources for assessing parents' vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review of the literature.评估父母疫苗犹豫资源的文献系统综述。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2020 Oct 6;61(3):E340-E373. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.3.1448. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
A systematic review of studies that measure parental vaccine attitudes and beliefs in childhood vaccination.系统评价研究测量父母对儿童疫苗接种的态度和信念。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 17;20(1):1253. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09327-8.
7
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views.支持和反对疫苗接种观点的在线竞争。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7811):230-233. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2281-1. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
Assessing vaccine hesitancy in the UK population using a generalized vaccine hesitancy survey instrument.使用广义疫苗犹豫调查工具评估英国人群中的疫苗犹豫情况。
Vaccine. 2019 Apr 24;37(18):2494-2501. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
9
Measuring vaccine hesitancy, confidence, trust and flu vaccine uptake: Results of a national survey of White and African American adults.测量疫苗犹豫、信心、信任和流感疫苗接种率:一项针对白人和非裔美国成年人的全国性调查结果。
Vaccine. 2019 Feb 21;37(9):1168-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
10
Reliability and validity of a survey to identify vaccine hesitancy among parents in Changxing county, Zhejiang province.浙江省长兴县父母疫苗犹豫调查的信度和效度。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(5):1092-1099. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1572409. Epub 2019 Mar 19.