Buziau Amée M, Eussen Simone J P M, Kooi M Eline, van der Kallen Carla J H, van Dongen Martien C J M, Schaper Nicolaas C, Henry Ronald M A, Schram Miranda T, Dagnelie Pieter C, van Greevenbroek Marleen M J, Wesselius Anke, Bekers Otto, Meex Steven J R, Schalkwijk Casper G, Stehouwer Coen D A, Brouwers Martijn C G J
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Care. 2022 May 1;45(5):1116-1123. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2123.
Epidemiological evidence regarding the relationship between fructose intake and intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content is inconclusive. We, therefore, assessed the relationship between different sources of fructose and IHL at the population level.
We used cross-sectional data from The Maastricht Study, a population-based cohort study (n = 3,981; mean ± SD age: 60 ± 9 years; 50% women). We assessed the relationship between fructose intake (assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire)-total and derived from fruit, fruit juice, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB)-and IHL (quantified with 3T Dixon MRI) with adjustment for age, sex, type 2 diabetes, education, smoking status, physical activity, and intakes of total energy, alcohol, saturated fat, protein, vitamin E, and dietary fiber.
Energy-adjusted total fructose intake and energy-adjusted fructose from fruit were not associated with IHL in the fully adjusted models (P = 0.647 and P = 0.767). In contrast, energy-adjusted intake of fructose from fruit juice and SSB was associated with higher IHL in the fully adjusted models (P = 0.019 and P = 0.009). Individuals in the highest tertile of energy-adjusted intake of fructose from fruit juice and SSB had a 1.04-fold (95% CI 0.99; 1.11) and 1.09-fold (95% CI 1.03; 1.16) higher IHL, respectively, in comparison with the lowest tertile in the fully adjusted models. Finally, the association for fructose from fruit juice was stronger in individuals with type 2 diabetes (P for interaction = 0.071).
Fructose from fruit juice and SSB is independently associated with higher IHL. These cross-sectional findings contribute to current knowledge in support of measures to reduce the intake of fructose-containing beverages as a means to prevent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease at the population level.
关于果糖摄入量与肝内脂质(IHL)含量之间关系的流行病学证据尚无定论。因此,我们在人群层面评估了不同来源的果糖与IHL之间的关系。
我们使用了来自马斯特里赫特研究的横断面数据,这是一项基于人群的队列研究(n = 3981;平均±标准差年龄:60±9岁;50%为女性)。我们评估了果糖摄入量(通过食物频率问卷评估)——总量以及来自水果、果汁和含糖饮料(SSB)的果糖——与IHL(通过3T Dixon MRI定量)之间的关系,并对年龄、性别、2型糖尿病、教育程度、吸烟状况、身体活动以及总能量、酒精、饱和脂肪、蛋白质、维生素E和膳食纤维的摄入量进行了调整。
在完全调整模型中,能量调整后的总果糖摄入量以及来自水果的能量调整后的果糖与IHL无关(P = 0.647和P = 0.767)。相比之下,在完全调整模型中,来自果汁和SSB的能量调整后的果糖摄入量与较高的IHL相关(P = 0.019和P = 0.009)。在完全调整模型中,来自果汁和SSB的能量调整后的果糖摄入量处于最高三分位数的个体,其IHL分别比最低三分位数的个体高1.04倍(95%CI 0.99;1.11)和1.09倍(95%CI 1.03;1.16)。最后,果汁中的果糖与2型糖尿病个体的关联更强(交互作用P = 0.071)。
果汁和SSB中的果糖与较高的IHL独立相关。这些横断面研究结果有助于当前的知识体系,支持采取措施减少含果糖饮料的摄入量,作为在人群层面预防非酒精性脂肪性肝病的一种手段。