Suppr超能文献

头孢替坦与头孢西丁在剖宫产术中预防性应用的比较。

Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section.

作者信息

Varner M W, Weiner C P, Petzold C R, Galask R P

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):951-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90496-5.

Abstract

A study comparing the efficacy of cefotetan versus cefoxitin for prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section was carried out at the University of Iowa. After institutional review, 36 subjects who met the study criteria and agreed to participate were entered into the study; of these, 29 were evaluable for efficacy. Twenty subjects received a single 2 gm dose of cefotetan, and nine subjects received three 2 gm doses each of cefoxitin. Both antibiotics were administered intravenously at the time the umbilical cord was clamped. The subsequent doses of cefoxitin were given intravenously at four and eight hours after the initial dose. Clinical and bacteriologic responses were evaluated; there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, and both antibiotics provided effective prophylaxis against infection. It appears that cefotetan is a satisfactory antibiotic choice for cesarean section prophylaxis. Further, in this small study it appears that a single dose of cefotetan is as effective as three doses of cefoxitin. This implies that cefotetan would not only decrease administration time and supplies but would decrease the cost to the patient while maintaining very acceptable infection rates.

摘要

爱荷华大学开展了一项比较头孢替坦与头孢西丁在剖宫产患者中预防效果的研究。经过机构审查,36名符合研究标准并同意参与的受试者进入研究;其中,29名可评估疗效。20名受试者接受了单次2克剂量的头孢替坦,9名受试者接受了每剂2克的头孢西丁,共三剂。两种抗生素均在脐带结扎时静脉注射。头孢西丁的后续剂量在初始剂量后的4小时和8小时静脉注射。对临床和细菌学反应进行了评估;两组之间无统计学显著差异,两种抗生素均提供了有效的感染预防。看来头孢替坦是剖宫产预防的一种令人满意的抗生素选择。此外,在这项小型研究中,单次剂量的头孢替坦似乎与三剂头孢西丁一样有效。这意味着头孢替坦不仅会减少给药时间和用品,还会降低患者的费用,同时保持非常可接受的感染率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验