Suppr超能文献

Cefotetan versus cefoxitin as prophylaxis in hysterectomy.

作者信息

Orr J W, Varner R E, Kilgore L C, Holloway R C, McDiarmid M

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90498-9.

Abstract

Seventy hospitalized women were entered into an open, randomized, parallel study of antimicrobial prophylaxis for abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy with the use of either cefotetan, a new long-acting cephalosporin, or cefoxitin. Ninety-four percent of cefotetan recipients and 83% of cefoxitin recipients did not develop clinical signs or symptoms of infection. The satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were significantly different: 91% satisfactory (43 of 47 patients) for cefotetan and 74% satisfactory (17 of 23 patients) for cefoxitin. The two treatment groups demonstrated no significant differences in postoperative temperature changes, duration of hospitalization, or grading of surgical wounds. Neither drug was associated with significant side effects.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cefotetan versus cefoxitin as prophylaxis in hysterectomy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90498-9.
4
Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin prophylaxis for abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;158(3 Pt 2):706-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)44531-x.
6
Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):951-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90496-5.
8
Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):77-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80218-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验