Suppr超能文献

头孢替坦与头孢西丁用于子宫切除术预防感染的比较

Cefotetan versus cefoxitin as prophylaxis in hysterectomy.

作者信息

Orr J W, Varner R E, Kilgore L C, Holloway R C, McDiarmid M

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90498-9.

Abstract

Seventy hospitalized women were entered into an open, randomized, parallel study of antimicrobial prophylaxis for abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy with the use of either cefotetan, a new long-acting cephalosporin, or cefoxitin. Ninety-four percent of cefotetan recipients and 83% of cefoxitin recipients did not develop clinical signs or symptoms of infection. The satisfactory bacteriologic response rates were significantly different: 91% satisfactory (43 of 47 patients) for cefotetan and 74% satisfactory (17 of 23 patients) for cefoxitin. The two treatment groups demonstrated no significant differences in postoperative temperature changes, duration of hospitalization, or grading of surgical wounds. Neither drug was associated with significant side effects.

摘要

七十名住院女性参与了一项开放性、随机、平行研究,该研究旨在探讨使用新型长效头孢菌素头孢替坦或头孢西丁对腹部及阴道子宫切除术进行抗菌预防的效果。接受头孢替坦治疗的患者中有94%未出现感染的临床体征或症状,接受头孢西丁治疗的患者中这一比例为83%。细菌学反应的满意率存在显著差异:头孢替坦的满意率为91%(47例患者中的43例),头孢西丁的满意率为74%(23例患者中的17例)。两个治疗组在术后体温变化、住院时间或手术伤口分级方面均无显著差异。两种药物均未出现明显的副作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验