De Simoni Ottavia, Scarpa Marco, Soldà Caterina, Bergamo Francesca, Lonardi Sara, Fantin Alberto, Pilati Pierluigi, Gruppo Mario
Unit of Surgical Oncology of Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 3;11(3):812. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030812.
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), intended as induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radio-chemotherapy (RCT), has been taking hold in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the role of TNT followed by curative surgery.
Eligible studies were those reporting on patients with PDAC undergoing curative surgery after TNT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
A total of 1080 patients with PDAC who had undergone TNT were analyzed. The most common IC regimen was Gemcitabine (N 620, 57%). Toxicity during IC varied from 14% to 51%. Disease progression during IC varied from 3% to 25%. 607 (62%) patients underwent curative surgery after IC + CRT. In meta-analysis, the available data on lymph node metastases radicality and 2 years OS had better results in favor of TNT groups (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.20-2.60, = 0.004 and OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.19-3.47, = 0.01 and OR 1.64, CI 1.09-2.47, = 0.02, respectively).
Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, different selection criteria, and non-negligible drop-out rate, TNT demonstrated a potential superiority to NAT without CRT in oncological and pathological outcomes, even if the main differences seem to depend on the IC regimen.
全新辅助治疗(TNT),即先进行诱导化疗(IC),随后进行放化疗(RCT),已在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的治疗中逐渐得到应用。本综述的目的是总结关于TNT后行根治性手术作用的现有证据。
符合条件的研究是那些报告PDAC患者在TNT后接受根治性手术的研究。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。
共分析了1080例接受TNT的PDAC患者。最常见的IC方案是吉西他滨(n = 620,57%)。IC期间的毒性从14%到51%不等。IC期间的疾病进展从3%到25%不等。607例(62%)患者在IC + CRT后接受了根治性手术。在荟萃分析中,关于淋巴结转移根治性和2年OS的现有数据显示,TNT组有更好的结果(OR分别为1.77,95%CI 1.20 - 2.60,P = 0.004;OR 2.03,95%CI 1.19 - 3.47,P = 0.01;OR 1.64,CI 1.09 - 2.47,P = 0.02)。
尽管研究存在异质性、选择标准不同且脱落率不可忽视,但TNT在肿瘤学和病理学结果方面显示出相对于无CRT的新辅助治疗(NAT)的潜在优势,即使主要差异似乎取决于IC方案。