Venturini Sergio, Pontoni Elisa, Carnelos Rossella, Arcidiacono Domenico, Da Ros Silvia, De Santi Laura, Orso Daniele, Cugini Francesco, Fossati Sara, Callegari Astrid, Mancini Walter, Tonizzo Maurizio, Grembiale Alessandro, Crapis Massimo, Colussi GianLuca
Department of Infectious Diseases, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, 33170 Pordenone, Italy.
Department of Emergency Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, 33170 Pordenone, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 8;11(3):881. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030881.
A continuous demand for assistance and an overcrowded emergency department (ED) require early and safe discharge of low-risk severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients. We developed ( = 128) and validated ( = 330) the acute PNeumonia early assessment (aPNea) score in a tertiary hospital and preliminarily tested the score on an external secondary hospital ( = 97). The score's performance was compared to that of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). The composite outcome of either death or oral intubation within 30 days from admission occurred in 101 and 28 patients in the two hospitals, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the aPNea model was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.93) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.89) for the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The aPNea score discriminated low-risk patients better than NEWS2 at a 10% outcome probability, corresponding to five cut-off points and one cut-off point, respectively. aPNea's cut-off reduced the number of unnecessary hospitalizations without missing outcomes by 27% (95% CI, 9-41) in the validation cohort. NEWS2 was not significant. In the external cohort, aPNea's cut-off had 93% sensitivity (95% CI, 83-102) and a 94% negative predictive value (95% CI, 87-102). In conclusion, the aPNea score appears to be appropriate for discharging low-risk SARS-CoV-2-infected patients from the ED.
对援助的持续需求以及急诊科(ED)过度拥挤,这就要求对低风险的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染患者进行早期且安全的出院处理。我们在一家三级医院开发了(n = 128)并验证了(n = 330)急性肺炎早期评估(aPNea)评分,并在一家外部二级医院(n = 97)对该评分进行了初步测试。将该评分的表现与国家早期预警评分2(NEWS2)的表现进行了比较。在两家医院中,分别有101例和28例患者在入院后30天内出现死亡或气管插管的复合结局。aPNea模型在开发队列和验证队列中的受试者操作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积分别为0.86(95%置信区间(CI),0.78 - 0.93)和0.79(95%CI,0.73 - 0.89)。在结局概率为10%时,aPNea评分比NEWS2能更好地鉴别低风险患者,分别对应五个切点和一个切点。在验证队列中,aPNea的切点减少了不必要住院的数量,且未遗漏结局,减少了27%(95%CI,9 - 41)。NEWS2则无显著差异。在外部队列中,aPNea的切点具有93%的敏感性(95%CI,83 - 102)和94%的阴性预测值(95%CI,87 - 102)。总之,aPNea评分似乎适用于从急诊科让低风险的SARS-CoV-2感染患者出院。