• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金属托槽与釉质玻璃陶瓷和氧化锆之间的剪切粘结强度及抗脱粘指数评分:一项探究表面处理方案的体外研究

Shear bond strength and ARI scores of metal brackets to glazed glass ceramics and zirconia: an in vitro study investigating surface treatment protocols.

作者信息

Pédemay Claire, François Philippe, Fouquet Vincent, Abdel-Gawad Sarah, Attal Jean-Pierre, Dantagnan Claire-Adeline

机构信息

Private practice, 38 rue Aristide Briand, Meaux, 77100, France.

Faculty of Dentistry, Innovative Dental Materials and Interfaces Research Unit (URB2i), UR 4462, Paris Cité University, 1 rue Maurice Arnoux, Montrouge, 92120, France.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 28;24(1):1567. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05369-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05369-1
PMID:39732643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11682644/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores of metal brackets to glazed lithium disilicate reinforced glass-ceramics and zirconia according to various surface treatment protocols.

METHODS

A total of 240 lithium disilicate ceramic (LD) and 240 zirconia (Zr) blocks were randomly divided according to sandblasting, hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching, universal primer use, and the adhesive system applied. A maxillary canine metal bracket was bonded to each sample with resin cement (Transbond XT, TXT). SBS tests and ARI score analysis were performed. Four-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used for SBS differences, and Fisher's exact test was used for the ARI scores (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

All groups combining a universal primer with a universal adhesive with and without sandblasting provided satisfactory SBS values for both LD and Zr. Fractures of the samples were observed only for LD in the groups combining HF with universal primers and universal adhesives with and without sandblasting.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining a universal primer with a universal adhesive could be recommended for orthodontic bonding to both LD and Zr. Regarding their risks (i.e., damaging the restoration surface or burning the oral tissues), sandblasting or HF might not be necessary despite the presence of glaze covering the ceramic surface.

摘要

目的

根据不同的表面处理方案,评估金属托槽与釉质锂硅酸增强玻璃陶瓷及氧化锆之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和粘结剂残留指数(ARI)评分。

方法

将总共240块锂硅酸陶瓷(LD)和240块氧化锆(Zr)块根据喷砂、氢氟酸(HF)蚀刻、使用通用底漆以及所应用的粘结系统进行随机分组。用树脂水门汀(Transbond XT,TXT)将上颌尖牙金属托槽粘结到每个样本上。进行SBS测试和ARI评分分析。对于SBS差异,采用四因素方差分析并随后进行Tukey事后检验,对于ARI评分采用Fisher精确检验(p < 0.05)。

结果

所有将通用底漆与通用粘结剂结合使用(无论有无喷砂)的组,对于LD和Zr均提供了令人满意的SBS值。仅在将HF与通用底漆以及通用粘结剂结合使用(无论有无喷砂)的组中,观察到LD样本出现断裂。

结论

对于LD和Zr的正畸粘结,推荐将通用底漆与通用粘结剂结合使用。鉴于喷砂或HF存在风险(即损坏修复体表面或灼伤口腔组织),尽管陶瓷表面有釉质覆盖,喷砂或HF可能并非必要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/1db18e864477/12903_2024_5369_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/07da0ab06054/12903_2024_5369_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/4240d2ccb591/12903_2024_5369_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/f99c6a990771/12903_2024_5369_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/172582bb847a/12903_2024_5369_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/1db18e864477/12903_2024_5369_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/07da0ab06054/12903_2024_5369_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/4240d2ccb591/12903_2024_5369_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/f99c6a990771/12903_2024_5369_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/172582bb847a/12903_2024_5369_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d440/11682644/1db18e864477/12903_2024_5369_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Shear bond strength and ARI scores of metal brackets to glazed glass ceramics and zirconia: an in vitro study investigating surface treatment protocols.金属托槽与釉质玻璃陶瓷和氧化锆之间的剪切粘结强度及抗脱粘指数评分:一项探究表面处理方案的体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 28;24(1):1567. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05369-1.
2
Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets to zirconium crowns treated by sandblasting compared to enamel using a universal adhesive: An in vitro study.喷砂处理的氧化锆全瓷冠与牙釉质相比,采用通用粘结剂对金属正畸托槽的粘结强度:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2022 Jun;20(2):100640. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100640. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
[In vitro study evaluating the shear bond strength of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive].[使用通用粘合剂评估金属托槽与二硅酸锂陶瓷基底之间剪切粘结强度的体外研究]
Orthod Fr. 2022 Jun 1;93(2):101-109. doi: 10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56.
4
Influence of ceramic surface treatment on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets.陶瓷表面处理对陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(6):789-94. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.111261.
5
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to a new all-ceramic crown composed of lithium silicate infused with zirconia: An in vitro comparative study.正畸托槽与含氧化锆的硅酸锂新型全瓷冠粘结的剪切粘结强度:一项体外对比研究。
Int Orthod. 2019 Dec;17(4):726-732. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
6
Comparison of alternative adhesive cementation concepts for zirconia ceramic: glaze layer vs zirconia primer.氧化锆陶瓷不同胶接粘接概念的比较:釉层与氧化锆底涂。
J Adhes Dent. 2012 Feb;14(1):75-82. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a21493.
7
An in vitro study of orthodontic brackets bonded to transition dental zirconia: Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, and surface irregularities.正畸托槽与过渡性牙科氧化锆粘结的体外研究:剪切粘结强度、粘结剂残留指数及表面不规则性
Int Orthod. 2025 Mar;23(1):100940. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100940. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
8
Microtensile bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramics to resin adhesives.二硅酸锂陶瓷与树脂粘结剂的微拉伸粘结强度
J Adhes Dent. 2014 Dec;16(6):547-52. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33249.
9
Effect of different surface treatments and ceramic primers on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia ceramic.不同表面处理及陶瓷底漆对自粘结树脂水门汀与氧化锆陶瓷剪切粘结强度的影响
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Mar;22(3):335-341. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_394_18.
10
Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets to Porcelain Using a Universal Adhesive.使用通用粘合剂时金属托槽与瓷的剪切粘结强度。
Med Arch. 2018 Dec;72(6):425-429. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.425-429.

引用本文的文献

1
Bonding Orthodontic Attachments to 3D-Printed Photosensitive Definitive Resin: An In Vitro Study.将正畸附件粘结至3D打印光敏最终树脂的体外研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;13(8):341. doi: 10.3390/dj13080341.

本文引用的文献

1
Glazing as a bonding system for zirconia dental ceramics.作为氧化锆牙科陶瓷粘结系统的釉料
Mater Today Proc. 2023 Sep 5;89:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.308. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
2
Does the universal adhesive's film thickness affect dentin-bonding effectiveness?通用粘结剂的膜厚度是否会影响牙本质粘结效果?
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Feb 15;28(2):150. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05523-7.
3
Adhesive Performance of Resin Cement to Glass-Ceramic and Polymer-Based Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials after Applying Self-Etching Ceramic Primer or Different Surface Treatments.
应用自酸蚀陶瓷底漆或不同表面处理后树脂水门汀与玻璃陶瓷和聚合物基陶瓷CAD/CAM材料的粘结性能
Materials (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;17(1):2. doi: 10.3390/ma17010002.
4
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to high-translucent dental zirconia with different surface treatments: An in vitro study.不同表面处理的正畸托槽与高透光性牙科氧化锆的抗剪粘接强度:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2024 Mar;22(1):100822. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100822. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
5
Effect of ceramic primers with different chemical contents on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics with resin cement after thermal ageing.不同化学物质含量的陶瓷底涂剂对热老化后 CAD/CAM 陶瓷与树脂水门汀剪切粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02909-z.
6
[In vitro study evaluating the shear bond strength of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive].[使用通用粘合剂评估金属托槽与二硅酸锂陶瓷基底之间剪切粘结强度的体外研究]
Orthod Fr. 2022 Jun 1;93(2):101-109. doi: 10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56.
7
The effect of surface treatment and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to the Y-TZP zirconia ceramics: A systematic review.表面处理和热循环对正畸托槽与 Y-TZP 氧化锆陶瓷粘结强度的影响:系统评价。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Oct 25;26(5):e212118. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e212118.oar. eCollection 2021.
8
Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets.不同预处理和附着材料对整体氧化锆修复体与金属托槽之间抗剪粘接强度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 20;12(1):8514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5.
9
Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives.使用通用粘合剂将托槽粘结到全瓷材料上。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;15(3):1245. doi: 10.3390/ma15031245.
10
Investigations of silane-MDP interaction in universal adhesives: A ToF-SIMS analysis.通用粘合剂中硅烷 - MDP相互作用的研究:飞行时间二次离子质谱分析
Dent Mater. 2022 Jan;38(1):183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 21.