Suppr超能文献

[使用通用粘合剂评估金属托槽与二硅酸锂陶瓷基底之间剪切粘结强度的体外研究]

[In vitro study evaluating the shear bond strength of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive].

作者信息

Essayagh Tourot Jessica, Dantagnan Claire-Adeline, Francois Philippe, Dursun Elisabeth, Attal Jean-Pierre

出版信息

Orthod Fr. 2022 Jun 1;93(2):101-109. doi: 10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The number of adult patients who seek an orthodontic treatment is increasing. These patients often have lithium disilicate ceramic restorations. The orthodontist has to find a procedure to bond effectively brackets to these restorations. In 2011, a new family of adhesives was introduced, universal adhesives, which are capable of bonding to ceramic and are said “multi-mode” because they can be used in etching-rinse or self-etching protocol on tooth surface. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty machinable lithium disilicate blocks (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were prepared according manufacturer’s instructions. Each specimen was randomly assigned to one of four groups (n=9 or 10) defined by the pretreatment protocol. Protocol 1: Hydrofluoric Acid 9 % (HF) + Silane + Orthodontic adhesive (Transbond™ XT Light Cure Adhesive Primer, 3M ESPE), protocol 2: HF + Universal adhesive (UA) (Scotchbond Universal®, 3M ESPE), protocol 3: UA only, protocol 4 : Monobond Etch & Prime® (Ivoclar) + UA. Then, a bracket of upper cuspid (3M ESPE) was bonded to each specimen with a composite resin (Transbond™ XT, 3M ESPE). SBS was measured between ceramic and bracket with a universal testing machine. A one-way ANOVA (ANalysis Of Variance) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed to investigate SBS differences between groups.

RESULTS

Protocol 2 (43 MPa) and protocol 4 (36 MPa) showed the highest SBS values and were statistically different from protocol 1 (25 MPa) and protocol 3 (21 MPa).

CONCLUSION

Despite the lower bond values obtained in the study, but higher than the minimum expected, the application of UA alone appears to be a safe procedure that seems to provide sufficiently strong and resistant bonding between the ceramic and the bracket. However, clinical studies are needed before a recommendation can be made.

摘要

引言

寻求正畸治疗的成年患者数量正在增加。这些患者通常有二硅酸锂陶瓷修复体。正畸医生必须找到一种能有效将托槽粘结到这些修复体上的方法。2011年,引入了一种新型粘结剂系列——通用粘结剂,它能够粘结到陶瓷上,并且由于可以在牙齿表面的酸蚀冲洗或自酸蚀方案中使用,所以被称为“多模式”粘结剂。本体外研究的目的是使用一种通用粘结剂评估金属托槽与二硅酸锂陶瓷基底之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。

材料与方法

按照制造商的说明制备了40个可加工的二硅酸锂块(义获嘉e.max CAD,义获嘉公司)。每个样本被随机分配到由预处理方案定义的四组之一(n = 9或10)。方案1:9%氢氟酸(HF)+硅烷+正畸粘结剂(Transbond™ XT光固化粘结剂底漆,3M ESPE公司),方案2:HF +通用粘结剂(UA)(Scotchbond Universal®,3M ESPE公司),方案3:仅使用UA,方案4:Monobond Etch & Prime®(义获嘉公司)+ UA。然后,用复合树脂(Transbond™ XT,3M ESPE公司)将上颌尖牙托槽(3M ESPE公司)粘结到每个样本上。使用万能试验机测量陶瓷与托槽之间的SBS。进行单因素方差分析(ANalysis Of Variance),随后进行Tukey事后检验,以研究各组之间的SBS差异。

结果

方案2(43兆帕)和方案4(36兆帕)显示出最高的SBS值,并且与方案1(25兆帕)和方案3(21兆帕)在统计学上有差异。

结论

尽管在本研究中获得的粘结值较低,但高于预期最小值,单独使用UA似乎是一种安全的方法,似乎能在陶瓷和托槽之间提供足够强且持久的粘结。然而,在能够给出推荐之前还需要进行临床研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验