Hernandez Wilson, Viviescas Alvaro, Riveros-Jerez Carlos Alberto
School of Civil Engineering, Industrial University of Santander, Carrera 27 Calle 9, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia.
Faculty of Engineering, University of Antioquia, Calle 67 No. 53-108, Medellín 050010, Colombia.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 5;22(3):1219. doi: 10.3390/s22031219.
In-service prestressed concrete box girder bridges have received increasing attention in recent years due to a large number of bridges reaching decades in service. Therefore, the ageing of infrastructure demands the development of robust condition assessment methodologies based on affordable technology such as vehicle-induced vibration tests (VITs) in contrast with more expensive existing technologies such as tests using hammers or shakers. Ambient vibration tests (AVTs) have been widely used worldwide, taking advantage of freely available ambient excitation sources. However, the literature has commonly reported insufficient input energy to excite the structure to obtain satisfactory modal identification results, especially in long-span concrete bridges. On the other hand, the use of forced vibration tests (FVTs) requires more economic resources. This paper presents the results of field measurements at optimally selected locations in VITs consisting of a 32-ton truck and a springboard with a height of 50 mm. AVTs using optimal sensor placement (OSP) provide similar results to VITs without considering OSP locations. Additionally, the VIT/AVT cost ratio is reduced to 2 since a shorter data collection time is achieved within a one-day (8 h) test framework, which minimizes temperature effects, thus leading to improvements in AVT identification results, especially in vertical modes.
近年来,随着大量桥梁服役年限达到数十年,在用预应力混凝土箱梁桥受到了越来越多的关注。因此,基础设施的老化要求开发基于经济适用技术的可靠状态评估方法,如车辆诱发振动测试(VITs),以对比更昂贵的现有技术,如使用锤子或振动器的测试。环境振动测试(AVTs)利用免费可得的环境激励源,在全球范围内得到了广泛应用。然而,文献中普遍报道输入能量不足以激励结构以获得令人满意的模态识别结果,尤其是在大跨度混凝土桥梁中。另一方面,使用强迫振动测试(FVTs)需要更多经济资源。本文展示了在由一辆32吨重的卡车和一块高度为50毫米的跳板组成的车辆诱发振动测试中,在最佳选定位置进行现场测量的结果。使用最优传感器布置(OSP)的环境振动测试提供了与不考虑OSP位置的车辆诱发振动测试相似的结果。此外,车辆诱发振动测试/环境振动测试成本比降至2,因为在一天(8小时)的测试框架内实现了更短的数据采集时间,这最大限度地减少了温度影响,从而改善了环境振动测试识别结果,尤其是在垂直模态方面。