• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证了一种模型,用于预测内镜止血治疗高危消化性溃疡出血后 3 天内再出血的风险。

Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China.

First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02145-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12876-022-02145-9
PMID:35164682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8843020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer bleeding remains a typical medical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Peptic ulcer rebleeding often occurs within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis. Our study aims to develop a nomogram to predict rebleeding within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 386 patients with bleeding ulcers and high-risk stigmata who underwent emergent endoscopic hemostasis between March 2014 and October 2018. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to identify predictors. The model was displayed as a nomogram. Internal validation was carried out using bootstrapping. The model was evaluated using the calibration plot, decision-curve analyses, and clinical impact curve.

RESULTS

Overall, 386 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled, with 48 patients developed rebleeding within three days after initial endoscopic hemostasis. Predictors contained in the nomogram included albumin, prothrombin time, shock, haematemesis/melena and Forrest classification. The model showed good discrimination and good calibration with a C-index of 0.854 (C-index: 0.830 via bootstrapping validation). Decision-curve analyses and clinical impact curve also demonstrated that it was clinically valuable.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a nomogram that incorporates clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic features, effectively predicting rebleeding within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis and identifying high-risk rebleeding patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Trial registration This clinical trial has been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04895904) approved by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

摘要

背景

消化性溃疡出血仍是一种具有较高发病率和死亡率的典型急症。在急诊内镜止血后 3 天内,消化性溃疡常再次出血。本研究旨在为高危消化性溃疡出血患者开发一种预测内镜止血后 3 天内再出血的列线图。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2014 年 3 月至 2018 年 10 月期间接受急诊内镜止血的 386 例出血性溃疡和高危征象患者的数据。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子法识别预测因子。模型以列线图的形式呈现。内部验证采用 bootstrap 法。通过校准图、决策曲线分析和临床影响曲线评估模型。

结果

共纳入 386 例符合纳入标准的患者,其中 48 例患者在初始内镜止血后 3 天内再次出血。列线图中的预测因子包括白蛋白、凝血酶原时间、休克、呕血/黑便和 Forrest 分级。该模型具有良好的区分度和校准度,C 指数为 0.854(通过 bootstrap 验证的 C 指数为 0.830)。决策曲线分析和临床影响曲线也表明该模型具有临床价值。

结论

本研究提出了一种包含临床、实验室和内镜特征的列线图,能够有效预测急诊内镜止血后 3 天内再出血,并识别高危消化性溃疡出血再出血患者。

试验注册

本临床试验已在临床试验.gov(ID:NCT04895904)注册,经国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)批准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/cc87946d585e/12876_2022_2145_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/7036cceb662b/12876_2022_2145_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/3b59b887092f/12876_2022_2145_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/4169bf43ed10/12876_2022_2145_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/8d244a8bd2e3/12876_2022_2145_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/3b9612163fb6/12876_2022_2145_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/cc87946d585e/12876_2022_2145_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/7036cceb662b/12876_2022_2145_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/3b59b887092f/12876_2022_2145_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/4169bf43ed10/12876_2022_2145_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/8d244a8bd2e3/12876_2022_2145_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/3b9612163fb6/12876_2022_2145_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ba/8843020/cc87946d585e/12876_2022_2145_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding.开发并验证了一种模型,用于预测内镜止血治疗高危消化性溃疡出血后 3 天内再出血的风险。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02145-9.
2
Nomogram for predicting rebleeding after initial endoscopic epinephrine injection monotherapy hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.预测内镜肾上腺素注射单一疗法止血后消化性溃疡出血患者再出血的列线图:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 31;22(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02448-x.
3
Helicobacter pylori infection does not affect the early rebleeding rate in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic hemostasis: a prospective single-center trial.幽门螺杆菌感染不影响消化性溃疡出血患者内镜止血成功后的早期再出血率:一项前瞻性单中心试验。
Endoscopy. 2003 May;35(5):393-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38775.
4
Renal Dysfunction is an Independent Risk Factor for Rebleeding After Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding.肾功能不全是消化性溃疡出血内镜止血后再出血的独立危险因素。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug;32(8):622-630. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2021.20202.
5
Treatment and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcers and erosions - (BLUE study).治疗和结局的胃肠道出血由于消化性溃疡和侵蚀- (蓝色研究)。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan;57(1):8-15. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1988701. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
The Use of Higher Dose Steroids Increases the Risk of Rebleeding After Endoscopic Hemostasis for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding.高剂量类固醇的使用会增加消化性溃疡出血内镜止血后再出血的风险。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3033-3040. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5209-y. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
High- versus low-dose proton pump inhibitors post endoscopic hemostasis in hemodialysis cases with peptic ulcer bleeding.内镜止血后高剂量与低剂量质子泵抑制剂治疗血液透析患者消化性溃疡出血。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Jan-Mar;84(1):3-8. doi: 10.51821/84.1.654.
8
Predictive factors of rebleeding and mortality following endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers.消化性溃疡出血内镜止血后再出血和死亡的预测因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Jan-Feb;60(121):112-7. doi: 10.5754/hge11838.
9
Factors influencing re-bleeding after trans-arterial embolization for endoscopically unmanageable peptic ulcer bleeding.影响内镜治疗无效的消化性溃疡出血患者经动脉栓塞治疗后再出血的因素。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan-Jun;59(1):7-15. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2253346. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
10
Endoscopic factors predisposing to rebleeding following endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers.消化性溃疡出血内镜止血后再出血的内镜相关危险因素。
Endoscopy. 2001 Nov;33(11):969-75. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17951.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing Factors (History of Alcohol Consumption) and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model for In-Hospital Gastrointestinal Bleeding Secondary to Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage in a Certain Hospital.某医院急性脑出血继发院内胃肠道出血的影响因素(饮酒史)及列线图预测模型的构建
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 May 11;18:1557-1568. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S511692. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk factors and prediction model for rebleeding in grade IIb peptic ulcer patients after endoscopy.IIb级消化性溃疡患者内镜检查后再出血的危险因素及预测模型
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2124-2134. doi: 10.62347/CJAZ6726. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Therapies for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:内镜治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血:专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Sep;159(3):1120-1128. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.095. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.比较 AIMS65 评分与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德和罗克洛评分系统对上消化道出血患者住院死亡风险的预测。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2020 Jun;112(6):467-473. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.6496/2019.
3
Clinical Epidemiology, Etiology, and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding at a Tertiary Center in Bahrain: A Retrospective Study.
巴林一家三级医疗中心上消化道出血的临床流行病学、病因及转归:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 8;17(1):e77133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77133. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding one year after the initial episode.初次发作后一年消化性溃疡出血的危险因素。
Gut Pathog. 2024 Nov 28;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13099-024-00669-x.
5
Assessing peptic ulcer risk with the HAMPROW score in the general Chinese population.评估一般中国人群中消化性溃疡风险的 HAMPROW 评分。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55224-0.
6
Risk factors for rebleeding in gastroduodenal ulcers.胃十二指肠溃疡再出血的危险因素。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Feb;193(1):173-179. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03450-2. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
7
A Nomogram Model for Prediction of Mortality Risk of Patients with Dangerous Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Two-center Retrospective Study.一种用于预测高危上消化道出血患者死亡风险的列线图模型:一项两中心回顾性研究。
Curr Med Sci. 2023 Aug;43(4):723-732. doi: 10.1007/s11596-023-2748-z. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Adults: Evaluation and Management.
成人上消化道出血:评估与管理。
Am Fam Physician. 2020 Mar 1;101(5):294-300.
4
Endoscopist's Judgment Is as Useful as Risk Scores for Predicting Outcome in Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Multicenter Study.内镜医师的判断在预测消化性溃疡出血结局方面与风险评分同样有用:一项多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 3;9(2):408. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020408.
5
Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的管理:国际共识组的指南推荐。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):805-822. doi: 10.7326/M19-1795. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
6
AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.AIMS65 评分系统在预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的临床结局方面可与 Glasgow-Blatchford 评分或 Rockall 评分相媲美。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 26;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1051-8.
7
Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.急性上消化道出血的处理。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 25;364:l536. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l536.
8
Machine learning model to predict recurrent ulcer bleeding in patients with history of idiopathic gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding.用于预测有特发性胃十二指肠溃疡出血史患者复发性溃疡出血的机器学习模型。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Apr;49(7):912-918. doi: 10.1111/apt.15145. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
9
An extensive experimental survey of regression methods.回归方法的广泛实验调查。
Neural Netw. 2019 Mar;111:11-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators.报告和解读决策曲线分析:研究人员指南。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Sep 19.