Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 May;10(5):1169-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.01.043. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
With advances in understanding the role of eosinophils in disease pathogenesis, particularly in the airways, gastrointestinal tract, and skin, targeting eosinophils or the cytokines that lead to their production, activation, and survival has become an increasingly pursued therapeutic approach. Newly developed biologic agents target eosinophils directly, other cells interacting with or activating eosinophils, or cytokines in the type 2 inflammatory pathway with specific antibodies. Current treatment paradigms reserve therapy with biologics for patients refractory to or intolerant of corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Given accumulating data for safety and efficacy of these biologics, however, there is the question of whether targeted treatments should be used earlier in the treatment algorithm. In this article, we discuss the pros and cons of using biologics as first-line therapy for eosinophilic diseases of the airways, gastrointestinal tract, and skin. We highlight emerging biologic agents and future directions for research, as well as a rationale for the early use of some biologics to prevent tissue damage, disease progression, and organ dysfunction in selected conditions.
随着人们对嗜酸性粒细胞在疾病发病机制中的作用(尤其是在气道、胃肠道和皮肤中)的理解不断深入,针对嗜酸性粒细胞或导致其产生、激活和存活的细胞因子的靶向治疗已成为一种越来越受关注的治疗方法。新开发的生物制剂可直接靶向嗜酸性粒细胞,或靶向与嗜酸性粒细胞相互作用或激活嗜酸性粒细胞的其他细胞,或靶向 2 型炎症途径中的细胞因子,采用特异性抗体进行治疗。目前的治疗方案将生物制剂的治疗保留给对皮质类固醇或免疫抑制剂不耐受或无反应的患者。然而,鉴于这些生物制剂在安全性和疗效方面积累的数据越来越多,人们开始质疑是否应在治疗算法中更早地使用靶向治疗。本文讨论了将生物制剂作为气道、胃肠道和皮肤嗜酸性疾病一线治疗的优缺点。我们重点介绍了新兴的生物制剂和未来的研究方向,以及在某些情况下早期使用某些生物制剂以预防组织损伤、疾病进展和器官功能障碍的合理性。