Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Apr;151:104054. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104054. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
Recent evidence suggests that cognitive remediation (CR) may reduce cognitive and functional difficulties in people with bipolar disorder (BD). However, there is a limited understanding of whether, and which, pre-treatment factors influence who will benefit from CR and this information could help to develop optimal therapy delivery. We aim to identify and examine baseline factors moderating post-treatment improvement.
This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial comparing CR (n = 40) to treatment-as-usual (TAU; n = 40) in euthymic people with BD. Elastic net regression was used to identify patient characteristics and baseline measures associated with post-treatment improvement in cognition, psychosocial functioning, and goal attainment. We then tested the moderating effect of retained variables on each outcome using multivariable linear regression.
Despite lower baseline cognitive performance being associated with greater post-treatment changes in cognition and psychosocial functioning, there was no evidence of treatment response moderation. CR effect on goal attainment was larger for participants with better baseline cognitive performance, but this moderating effect did not reach significance (p = 0.09). Those with more severe baseline subjective cognitive complaints (p = 0.03) and more previously completed psychological therapies (p = 0.02) had also larger gains in goal attainment.
Treatment benefits in cognition and psychosocial functioning might not be affected by pre-treatment factors and patient characteristics. However, baseline cognition and perceived deficits may influence the effect of CR on achieving recovery goals. Therapy adaptations may be required to exert greater benefits for less responsive patients.
最近的证据表明,认知矫正(CR)可能会减轻双相情感障碍(BD)患者的认知和功能障碍。然而,对于哪些治疗前因素会影响 CR 的效果,以及哪些因素会影响 CR 的效果,人们的理解还很有限,而这些信息可能有助于制定最佳的治疗方案。我们旨在确定并检查影响治疗后改善的基线因素。
这是一项针对一项随机对照试验数据的二次分析,该试验比较了认知矫正(CR;n=40)与常规治疗(TAU;n=40)在双相情感障碍患者中的疗效。弹性网络回归用于确定与认知、心理社会功能和目标实现治疗后改善相关的患者特征和基线指标。然后,我们使用多变量线性回归测试保留变量对每个结果的调节作用。
尽管基线认知表现较低与认知和心理社会功能治疗后变化更大相关,但没有证据表明治疗反应存在调节作用。对于基线认知表现较好的患者,CR 对目标实现的影响更大,但这种调节作用没有达到显著性(p=0.09)。基线主观认知抱怨更严重(p=0.03)和以前完成的心理治疗次数更多(p=0.02)的患者,在目标实现方面也有更大的改善。
治疗对认知和心理社会功能的益处可能不受治疗前因素和患者特征的影响。然而,基线认知和感知缺陷可能会影响 CR 对实现康复目标的效果。可能需要进行治疗调整,以使反应较差的患者获得更大的益处。